Thanks for making my point.I guess I must not be a serious racer then....I did have Forza Horizon on the Series X and could not tell the difference to be honest. Like I said I had no problem driving the cars in most wanted.
Nintendo refuses to use HAL effect?
Nah, they usin' HAL effect already. HAL Labs have two Switch 2 games coming.
No problem... don't let me keep you from your serious racing.Thanks for making my point.
Hall effect sticks and analog triggers are old enough that cheapshit Chinese emulator handhelds use them.Because it's new and expensive and Nintendo only thrust what's old and cheap.
Shielding costs money. Probably a significant fraction of a dollar. Nintendo will not risk losing 100 million (possible sales goal) * 50 cents + the cost delta to use Hall effect sticks over their slightly tweaked previous shit design. If they used hall effect sticks Mario Kart would have to be 100 bucks and include MTXAs somebody whose dissertation was based on miniaturised magnetic actuators, this is such a stupid video. If you put a magnet on an unshielded hall effect sensor, of course it will not work. This does not apply to a Switch 2 for the following reasons:
Firstly, Nintendo are not using a big ass 1cm^3 magnet, they are most likely using magnets whose volume and thus, magnetic field strength is lower. And the magnets in Switch 2 are sufficiently far away from the sticks that this will not pose an issue. Even if it were an issue, the sticks and sensor module can be shielded using high permeability material shield, which will "short" the magnetic field lines, just like metal foils block electric field lines.
The proof of this is in his video itself, the camera does not move even though the magnet is relatively close @4:00 - 4:01 again at 4:34-4:35, no movement when the camera is even slightly away from the hall effect stick.
Nintendo are so cheap that every penny matters. I am so surprised they actually price their games at 79.99 when they could do 80.00 and make a few more million during the gen.Hall effect sticks and analog triggers are old enough that cheapshit Chinese emulator handhelds use them.
actually, those cheap shit Chinese has a lot of newer stuff because they don't care about regulations, they just want a edge on the competition. That's probably how Nintendo see it too.Hall effect sticks and analog triggers are old enough that cheapshit Chinese emulator handhelds use them.
Correct. When they're projected to sell 100+ million of the things, every dollar spent is a dollar not earned.Nintendo are so cheap that every penny matters.
That's probably because of the general market force. Even they can't fight that one.I am so surprised they actually price their games at 79.99 when they could do 80.00 and make a few more million during the gen.
The Chinese cut a fair number of corners in their devices. The main two reasons why they put fancy controls in their higher-end emuhelds are a) marketing (everybody knows Hall sticks are about 80% less likely to start drifting randomly, so devices with them are more desirable); b) because those are supposed to run games from a lot of different platforms, some of whom use analog triggers in their game controls.actually, those cheap shit Chinese has a lot of newer stuff because they don't care about regulations, they just want a edge on the competition. That's probably how Nintendo see it too.
The most obvious answer is because they would have to pay licensing fees, as "Hall effect" is patented/trademarked.
Nintendo basically just made their own version to circumvent having to pay licensing fees.
They made their own version joystick tech is what I mean. I'm sure they used tech that is designed to reduce stick drift as that was one of their major (and costly) design flaws of Switch 1.Any source for that? As of now they seem to still be using potentiometers, from what I've seen.