IrishNinja
Member
Segata Sanshiro said:Sure it can, if people can get it through their heads that a 10 (or in this case, an A+) doesn't mean perfect. Unfortunately, that's one of the oldest losing battles in the history of gaming coverage. Because the average gamer, like the average human, is pretty fucking thick.
i think this is a fair point - even the best games have a few flaws/things that can be improved, so yeah, 10 = perfect is a flawed concept, no doubt.
but - and im saying this without having seen the other half of said review - with this particular example, just how glowing would the other half have to be to salvage this and still give it the highest possible score? dude says he hates the dialogue: fair enough, it's a shooter, not the genre's strength anyway. AI doesnt look good: this is a bit more damning, but even the most beloved 1st/3rd person shooters often ended up with shitty AI. matchmaking = broken: this is pretty harsh, given that this was a huge part of the gameplay, no? he's even ranking on the modes & maps offered.
let's say the other half comes back with: but the level design was outstanding, and co-op was mad fun, which is what i came for, and boy did it deliver! would that (or any other factors im leaving out, in addition to) strike you as a 10/10 review? i gotta say, game = sum of its parts is also a fair claim, but having been bored by Halo 3's single player (despite somewhat enjoying 1's SP more, as i recall), even with awesome co-op and forge mode, i'm with yahtzee, 10/10's all over the place felt slightly off.