The insiders.Wow.Way to re-write the story. Where does the 1.5 for OS come from?
The insiders.Wow.Way to re-write the story. Where does the 1.5 for OS come from?
Persecution complex: The most complex complex of them all.Interesting thread title. Nothing to see here.
If this was a Xbox One story, I'm sure the thread title would be clearly spelled out. Word for word. And more than likely bolded!
My PC has plug n play since like forever.
PC Gaming is a heck of a lot more community oriented than consoles. Look at it's most popular genres: MMOs and MOBAs, games that highly emphasize team play and social groups.
Sony bid? Final Fantasy Versus was exclusive to PS3 to begin with.
I also informed the community Killer Instinct was a Free to Play title, sometimes you just get things wrong no matter what. E3 this year was a time where lots of papers were being shuffled left and right. I do my best to contribute, but I can be wrong too. My apologies dear sir.
Like in the 15 minutes between thuway claimed it was exclusive and the multiplatform announcement?Ever stop to think, that perhaps it was, and Microsoft came in at the last minute and secured another moneyhat?
What's funny is Cerny tells us that they doubled the RAM because the developers said 4GB is too little. Now all of a sudden, giving developers a pinch more and using the majority of the additional RAM for OS and everything is fine. They put in all of this extra GDDR5 RAM only to have the majority of it used for OS bloat. We're talking about future proofing... how about the lean mean gaming machine future proof the games and allocate more resources to it? No wonder that developer said Sony would be killed if they shipped with 4 GB of RAM with the story of this massive OS on the system. What did developers have to use before? 2 GB? 1.5 GB? If 4 GB is RAM aplenty for next-gen, take the extra 4 GDDR5 out and put that extra $50 or $80 towards a higher tier GPU.
I got on Microsoft for their massive resource usage not dedicated to games, so Sony will get the same treatment. At least in Microsoft's case, they are at least DOING something with the RAM, whether it be Kinect, the multiple operating systems or DVR functionality. Sony is just sitting on a massage pool of RAM for no reason they've communicated to gamers. 3.5 GB is utterly ridiculous. If 4.5 is supposedly enough for next-gen games, which are some of the most resource intensive applications around, what in the world is Sony planning to run in the background of a game? Allow you to instantaneously switch into a Home-esque 3d world/interface while playing a game?
Wow, you're allowed to flat out accuse mods of bias like that?I did a thread search for this after seeing it on another site, and couldn't find anything. I thought it was incredibly bizarre that NeoGAF wouldn't be talking about this, but then I found the incredibly cryptic thread title... then I remembered which side of the fence this site is on.
Err don't blame me they asked what the insiders are saying these numbers are from a shinobi post earlier .... Take it up with him :sWow.Way to re-write the story. Where does the 1.5 for OS come from? Feels like there is some salt affecting interpretations. Get over it.4.5-5.5 is plenty. Dick waving contest can still be won with these figures.
Yes. And do you think that was "just because", or do you think Sony paid for exclusivity?
What's funny is Cerny tells us that they doubled the RAM because the developers said 4GB is too little. Now all of a sudden, giving developers a pinch more and using the majority of the additional RAM for OS and everything is fine. They put in all of this extra GDDR5 RAM only to have the majority of it used for OS bloat. We're talking about future proofing... how about the lean mean gaming machine future proof the games and allocate more resources to it? No wonder that developer said Sony would be killed if they shipped with 4 GB of RAM with the story of this massive OS on the system. What did developers have to use before? 2 GB? 1.5 GB? If 4 GB is RAM aplenty for next-gen, take the extra 4 GDDR5 out and put that extra $50 or $80 towards a higher tier GPU.
I got on Microsoft for their massive resource usage not dedicated to games, so Sony will get the same treatment. At least in Microsoft's case, they are at least DOING something with the RAM, whether it be Kinect, the multiple operating systems or DVR functionality. Sony is just sitting on a massage pool of RAM for no reason they've communicated to gamers. 3.5 GB is utterly ridiculous. If 4.5 is supposedly enough for next-gen games, which are some of the most resource intensive applications around, what in the world is Sony planning to run in the background of a game? Allow you to instantaneously switch into a Home-esque 3d world/interface while playing a game?
It's amusing to see people think this is a big deal. PC games don't even use anywhere near 4GB between what is running in the OS memory space and what is held in GPU RAM. To think the hardware in the PS4 or X1 is ever going to be powerful enough to warrant needing 4+GB of RAM is pretty funny.
Reserving 1GB of memory for something you "might" need in the future is entirely stupid. Especially if your OS is already 1.5GB to begin with. That's basically saying you're going to have to add an entire operating system's worth of features at some point. Does anyone seriously believe Sony is going to add that much given what the PS4 can currently do with 1.5GB?
Well you should be smarter than repeat everything you're told. I occasionally get tidbits from friends about this and that (for example I knew all the time The Witcher 3 was coming to Xbone when CD-Projekt was refusing to announce it and their programmers impressions of the consoles), but I try to keep what I hear to myself.
Like in the 15 minutes between thuway claimed it was exclusive and the multiplatform announcement?
What's funny is Cerny tells us that they doubled the RAM because the developers said 4GB is too little.
Reading that people are cancelling pre-orders over this is baffling.
Persecution complex: The most complex complex of them all.
What's funny is Cerny tells us that they doubled the RAM because the developers said 4GB is too little. Now all of a sudden, giving developers a pinch more and using the majority of the additional RAM for OS and everything is fine. They put in all of this extra GDDR5 RAM only to have the majority of it used for OS bloat. We're talking about future proofing... how about the lean mean gaming machine future proof the games and allocate more resources to it? No wonder that developer said Sony would be killed if they shipped with 4 GB of RAM with the story of this massive OS on the system. What did developers have to use before? 2 GB? 1.5 GB? If 4 GB is RAM aplenty for next-gen, take the extra 4 GDDR5 out and put that extra $50 or $80 towards a higher tier GPU.
I got on Microsoft for their massive resource usage not dedicated to games, so Sony will get the same treatment. At least in Microsoft's case, they are at least DOING something with the RAM, whether it be Kinect, the multiple operating systems or DVR functionality. Sony is just sitting on a massage pool of RAM for no reason they've communicated to gamers. 3.5 GB is utterly ridiculous. If 4.5 is supposedly enough for next-gen games, which are some of the most resource intensive applications around, what in the world is Sony planning to run in the background of a game? Allow you to instantaneously switch into a Home-esque 3d world/interface while playing a game?
Both FFXIII and FFVersus were exclusive to PS3 at first, because Xbox was in a laughable state in general.
3.5 GB
2.5 GB
1.5 GB
Nobody knows , its called speculation and thanks to it we have a 100 page td.
Keep calm and wait for Sony , or developers statements....
Amazing how devs (you know, the guys and gals who work with this shit) all seem to be more than happy with the PS4's RAM. But don't let that cloud your righteous indignation.So this is confirmed? Lame. Cerny talk about getting devs the extra RAM they asked for seems disingenuous now
So this is confirmed? Lame. Cerny talk about getting devs the extra RAM they asked for seems disingenuous now
And you're sure of this?
Like in the 15 minutes between thuway claimed it was exclusive and the multiplatform announcement?
Yes, but not all games will be p2p. It depends if the dev/publisher wants to set up dedicated servers or not with Amazon/Google/etc.
Either way your previous post was very misleading in more ways than one.
So this is confirmed? Lame. Cerny talk about getting devs the extra RAM they asked for seems disingenuous now
So this is confirmed? Lame. Cerny talk about getting devs the extra RAM they asked for seems disingenuous now
And you're sure of this?
If devs had something like (let's say) 2.5GB to work with before the upgrade vs the 5.5GB they have now I think it's a massive upgrade.So this is confirmed? Lame. Cerny talk about getting devs the extra RAM they asked for seems disingenuous now
It's not entirely stupid given that people shit on the PS3's OS all the time because they didn't plan ahead.
90 jillion RAM. More RAM than sands on the beach. Cerny am liar.Why, how much Ram did they ask Cerny for?
1.4/10Think it will be more like 9.7 for games (well according to the info on this thread). The OS will be on Sony servers and the extra Ram will be piped over your network connection.
And yet all developers seem to be happy with the amount of RAM right now. How is that possible.
People need to stop saying this like it means anything. PS3's OS shrunk dramatically over the life of the system in terms of RAM usage, it was still bigger than the 360's OS, and it still lacked features in comparison. It had nothing to do with a lack of RAM.
Think it will be more like 9.7 for games (well according to the info on this thread). The OS will be on Sony servers and the extra Ram will be piped over your network connection.So the max possible amount is gonna be 6.5 for games down the line?
That's why CBOAT should keep his leaks to himself. Stuff like "MS is paying for not mentioning other versions" turned out to be flat out wrong. No point in doing those confirmations when you're wildly off the mark way too often.don't get why you're getting on thuway's case... a ton of stuff changed during E3. Even CBOAT wasn't 100% correct during this year's show.
You can easily build a $800 PC with a $300 Radeon 7950, which has 3GB GDDR5 and already 50% more powerful than PS4's GPU.
compare that to the cost of $400 PS4, and pay $50 a year for online for its life cycle (8 years?).
they cost the same!
If 4 GB is RAM aplenty for next-gen, take the extra 4 GDDR5 out and put that extra $50 or $80 towards a higher tier GPU.
If devs had something like (let's say) 2.5GB to work with before the upgrade vs the 5.5GB they have now I think it's a massive upgrade.
Think it will be more like 9.7 for games (well according to the info on this thread). The OS will be on Sony servers and the extra Ram will be piped over your network connection.
Who said this? Worse case there is 5.5GB of super fast memory and a really nice, feature rich and smooth OS. This is actually a positive to me, because it sounds to me like the PS4 will not only push better graphics, but keep up in terms of OS with the Xbone.Reading that people are cancelling pre-orders over this is baffling.
yeah, title change makes difficult to follow this thread. it should be something clear about what's going on.
Then what was it?
1.4/10
That's why CBOAT should keep his leaks to himself. Stuff like "MS is paying for not mentioning other versions" turned out to be flat out wrong. No point in doing those confirmations when you're wildly off the mark way too often.
It really is a lot easier to hear confirmation and THEN come out and say "i knew it"...
512 MB
to
3.5 GB
What the?