Damn, feel really bad for those who just got spoiled on The Last of Us
You guys, that isn't really a proper spoiler of The Last of Us, not some end game story revelation or anything like that. It's essentially the premise of the game, so don't worry if you read it. It would be like saying "Assassin's Creed is in a computer program."
I mean for the likes of Titan or any other card with a quantity of GDDR5 close to the PS4. $1000 for the whole package isn't that much since you're buying something to be used for more than playing games. But for someone who wants games alone with similar performance at a fraction of the cost, the PS4 is the perfect alternative to a gaming PC.
As mentioned already; a good gaming PC nets you about $1000. It will always range in that ballpark if you're going for an up-to-date system each time every three or so years.
Interesting thread title. Nothing to see here.
If this was a Xbox One story, I'm sure the thread title would be clearly spelled out. Word for word. And more than likely bolded!
It was going to be at some point but the contract didn't get signed.How the hell is thuway allowed to share his insider knowledge after the "FF15 is exclusive to PS4" debacle?
As mentioned already; a good gaming PC nets you about $1000. It will always range in that ballpark if you're going for an up-to-date system each time every three or so years.
The PS4 is less than half that, with the same games, some of its own exclusives, comparable performance, twice the shelf-life, more GDDR5 (potentially more performance), and so on. It's a completely moot point unless you're a rich bastard.
So is there a reason the thread title doesn't really tell you anything about what the thread is about?
Yeah man this conspiracy runs so deep. Remember that one speech Obama gave telling parents to "turn off the xbox"? I'm sure that's somehow involved.
$1000 every 3 years? Haha. Someone is doing something wrong if that is the cycle and price they buy PCs in. My last gaming PC prior to me upgrading lasted about 5 years. By the end of its gaming life I had to turn down certain graphics options, but it still looked better than the console versions of the same game.
When I finally upgraded last summer I used the same case, keyboard, mouse, DVD drive which saved a significant amount money. I could've used the same hard drive as well but I wanted a SATA III drive instead of the II that was in there.
$1000 every three years is not valid assessment of what is required for a gaming PC. Also how much is PSN/LIVE going to cost over 5 years? That adds $250 right there. Console games usually cost more and their prices stay higher longer. I game on both consoles and PCs and the cost difference isn't just A vs. B, many factors come out in the long run to make the costs closer than you would think.
now that we know only 4.5-5.5GB on PS4 would be available for games, how much of that would be used for video? half of that? so it has no advantage over a PC video card that has 2-3GB GDDR5. as for CPU tasks the CPU on PS4 only has 20GB/s bandwidth, so no advantage there over PC's DDR3 either.
(Oh man, here we go again)
What's exactly happening now that's making this thread almost 100 pages long?
It does not mean thuway was not deliberately spewing wrong info. What's funnier his bs was debunked like 20 minutes later.It was going to be at some point but the contract didn't get signed.
How the hell is thuway allowed to share his insider knowledge after the "FF15 is exclusive to PS4" debacle?
How the hell is thuway allowed to share his insider knowledge after the "FF15 is exclusive to PS4" debacle?
Been gone most of the day. Can someone give me a good breakdown of what's happened in the past few hours? I've seen some references to insider statements but can't track them down.
It was going to be at some point but the contract didn't get signed.
So is there a reason the thread title doesn't really tell you anything about what the thread is about?
You can easily build a $800 PC with a $300 Radeon 7950, which has 3GB GDDR5 and already 50% more powerful than PS4's GPU.
compare that to the cost of $400 PS4, and pay $50 a year for online for its life cycle (8 years?).
they cost the same!
Essentially insiders say
4.5 guaranteed
1.5 os now
1 bookmarked for things they may need to add to os (in reaction to features in xbone which become popular for eg party chat for ps3)
1 is flexible available to dev but it's heap memory not stack as of now.
They could free up the 1 back for os in the future and streamline the rest accordingly . Basically Sony is playing it safe . Also devs seem that some of these comments and discussions are way overblown and are happy with the ram available .
Bottom line 5.5 at launch or so. More later but that could take time
I think the whole story would only make sense if MSFT's TvTvTv presentation would have been a huge success and if there would have been a big outcry that Sony doesn't support such things. In this case I'd understand that they want to catch up and add those features too.
In reality it was completely the other way around. The whole Internet started to complain about MSFT'S attempt and Sony was praised into heaven for concentrating on a gaming machine. Everything just told them they're on the right track. Why would they try to catch up on something that they can clearly see is not wanted.
After all they have done until now it just doesn't make any sense. It's like they would now trash the dual shock 4 after all the praise and add a pad with touch screen similar to Wii U's because they see how bad it's selling.
1 bookmarked for things they may need to add to os (in reaction to features in xbone which become popular for eg party chat for ps3)
My PC has plug n play since like forever.PC Gaming isn't just for the rich anymore, no doubt. Console play is for the exclusives, communities, and plug and play experience.
Ironically /r/games thread is a better place to find out what this GAF thread is about. Even links GAF insider posts that have been posted.
Essentially insiders say
4.5 guaranteed
1.5 os now
1 bookmarked for things they may need to add to os (in reaction to features in xbone which become popular for eg party chat for ps3)
1 is flexible available to dev but it's heap memory not stack as of now.
They could free up the 1 back from os in the future and streamline the rest accordingly . Basically Sony is playing it safe . Also devs seem that some of these comments and discussions are way overblown and are happy with the ram available .
Bottom line 5.5 at launch or so. More later but that could take time
Interesting thread title. Nothing to see here.
If this was a Xbox One story, I'm sure the thread title would be clearly spelled out. Word for word. And more than likely bolded!
OK cool. Makes me feel better than I did while reading the article initially. Still disappointing though. Thankfully devs are happy, which is the most comforting thing I could hear. Hopefully stuff opens up later.Essentially insiders say
4.5 guaranteed
1.5 os now
1 bookmarked for things they may need to add to os (in reaction to features in xbone which become popular for eg party chat for ps3)
1 is flexible available to dev but it's heap memory not stack as of now.
They could free up the 1 back from os in the future and streamline the rest accordingly . Basically Sony is playing it safe . Also devs seem that some of these comments and discussions are way overblown and are happy with the ram available .
Bottom line 5.5 at launch or so. More later but that could take time
It does not mean thuway was not deliberately spewing wrong info. What's funnier his bs was debunked like 20 minutes later.
PC Gaming is a heck of a lot more community oriented than consoles. Look at it's most popular genres: MMOs and MOBAs, games that highly emphasize team play and social groups.PC Gaming isn't just for the rich anymore, no doubt. Console play is for the exclusives, communities, and plug and play experience.
Is that supposed to be 360?
Ever stop to think, that perhaps it was, and Microsoft came in at the last minute and secured another moneyhat?How the hell is thuway allowed to share his insider knowledge after the "FF15 is exclusive to PS4" debacle?
Please enlighten me. Does p2p multi player not take away resources from the host machine lowering the bar?
Wow.Way to re-write the story. Where does the 1.5 for OS come from? Feels like there is some salt affecting interpretations. Get over it.4.5-5.5 is plenty. Dick waving contest can still be won with these figures.Essentially insiders say
4.5 guaranteed
1.5 os now
1 bookmarked for things they may need to add to os (in reaction to features in xbone which become popular for eg party chat for ps3)
1 is flexible available to dev but it's heap memory not stack as of now.
They could free up the 1 back from os in the future and streamline the rest accordingly . Basically Sony is playing it safe . Also devs seem that some of these comments and discussions are way overblown and are happy with the ram available .
Bottom line 5.5 at launch or so. More later but that could take time
It was going to be at some point but the contract didn't get signed.
Ever stop to think, that perhaps it was, and Microsoft came in at the last minute and secured another moneyhat?
DF wouldnt be biased too!Interesting thread title. Nothing to see here.
If this was a Xbox One story, I'm sure the thread title would be clearly spelled out. Word for word. And more than likely bolded!
So I guess that means they out-bid Sony?
Could we get a clearer thread title ?
Waking up to a mass thread with no real understanding of what it is about it's helpful.
But from what I understand about the topic not much has changed and talk of cancelling preorders is maddness.
Interesting thread title. Nothing to see here.
If this was a Xbox One story, I'm sure the thread title would be clearly spelled out. Word for word. And more than likely bolded!