Support NeoGAF

[Goalus]

$80 or $90 pre-tax sounds reasonable.

 

[Puscifer]

With inflation, $100 is actually around what a game should be costing soooooooooooooooooooooooo


From 2006 at $60, that is basically $97 or so in todays money

So yea, I think it would help the industry rebound big time. Prices increase all over, as what you are paying for Netflix, Amazon Prime, a Big Mac, Eggs, Milk, a Movie ticket etc isn't the same from 2006, why the fuck would the price of such an expensive medium magically say the same with zero repercussions?

Yet some of you fucking wonder and cry and bitch about GAAS and MTX in games? lol

Increase the price, if you broke get a better job, let the games that fail, FAIL and let the games that make sense, get the reward and wait for a sale for everything else or something.

That $100 makes more sense then many care to admit.

Because GTA online is single handedly carrying Take-2 as a publisher what crack are you smoking homie? There's been several leaks saying this game is over a billion dollars in budget and I can guarantee you it'll have ZERO tech showing where that money went because we sure as hell aren't going to be toppling skyscrapers or having physics laden gunfights with massive amounts of damage and body reactions

 

[notseqi]

No way in hell I'll be buying games at $100. Expect me to work 5 hours to buy shit? I don't even like buying games at $60, and I've only bought two at $70, and never again.

just earn 100$ per hour and its only 1 hour of work

problems weren't

 

[UnrealEck]

They'll also release it on console only for a year or so. Just to get people to buy it twice.

I won't be buying it for that reason. I get that it can take longer to finalise a game on multiple PC configs but the length they take is absurd and doesn't excuse that.