lol satya's reply to phil's cocaine fueled hype will never be not funny.
thx.
lol satya's reply to phil's cocaine fueled hype will never be not funny.
Who cares at this point, Series X v PS5 is so passe.
A competitor who doesn't compete is pretty useless no?It's just the constant sony fan circle jerking. It's unfortunate, because losing a competitor in the industry is going to be absolutely terrible for the consumer. Example: look at Nvidia now with AMD.
Xbox hardware isnt bad. Id say if anything, xbox fans have givin up on xbox.No shit. MS have given up on Xbox hardware, and you are telling us that Sony is selling more PS ?
![]()
Xbox consoles actually been bad for the consumer the last 2 generations by not adding what is basically the industry standard in control features (Touch & IMU ) to it's controller.It's just the constant sony fan circle jerking. It's unfortunate, because losing a competitor in the industry is going to be absolutely terrible for the consumer. Example: look at Nvidia now with AMD.
Bu bu bu buuuuu *drool drips from mouth* those GOTY contenders don't count because they aren't in-house games.Going to be 10:1 with Death Stranding 2, enjoy! And as I've said before, Xbox hasn't "competed" in a decade, hasn't stopped PlayStation delivering GOTY contenders (and winners!) year in and year out, it is what it is.
Bu bu bu buuuuu *drool drips from mouth* those GOTY contenders don't count because they aren't in-house games.
lame controller kiddy gimmicks isnt why xbox is doing bad lol.Xbox consoles actually been bad for the consumer the last 2 generations by not adding what is basically the industry standard in control features (Touch & IMU ) to it's controller.
It doesn't matter if you like these features or not it was pretty ignorant in 2020 to release a console with a controller that didn't support these features & keep it from being a standard feature for devs to make gameplay around when creating multiplatform games.
Nintendo had the benefit of 3 things with the Switch. Being Nintendo, gaming handheld, and actually having games. And no gamepass.Even Nintendo came back from the dead from the Gamecube and the Wii U and they're not nearly a quarter as rich as Microsoft as a whole. We will just hope and pray that the next Xbox is worth a damn to keep Sony on their toes.
lame controller kiddy gimmicks isnt why xbox is doing bad lol.
Obviously. What's your point?A competitor who doesn't compete is pretty useless no?
Are you talking the TouchPad? That thing is trash.Xbox consoles actually been bad for the consumer the last 2 generations by not adding what is basically the industry standard in control features (Touch & IMU ) to it's controller.
It doesn't matter if you like these features or not it was pretty ignorant in 2020 to release a console with a controller that didn't support these features & keep it from being a standard feature for devs to make gameplay around when creating multiplatform games.
S/He's saying xbox is not competing very well so trying to pass the buck onto the consumer as if they have to bail them out of this situation simply because of "lack of competition" is stupid.Obviously. What's your point?
Who made any suggestion of bailing them out?S/He's saying xbox is not competing very well so trying to pass the buck onto the consumer as if they have to bail them out of this situation simply because of "lack of competition" is stupid.
Nobody, but you were saying thisWho made any suggestion of bailing them out?
The whole point is what good is a competitor who doesn't compete? It's competition that you're actually seeing but one offering a better product right now.It's just the constant sony fan circle jerking. It's unfortunate, because losing a competitor in the industry is going to be absolutely terrible for the consumer.
Touch & motion controls are more common than the d-pad & analog stick nowadays it doesn't matter how you feel about them they are common features in consumer products but Xbox Controller didn't support these features.Are you talking the TouchPad? That thing is trash.
Any basic reading comprehension ability should understand all I'm saying is that it's in poor taste to celebrate a major competitor dying, as it will lead to nothing but harm for the consumer. Whoever was capable of pulling "bailing out" out of what i said, I've got no idea how to respond to that.Nobody, but you were saying this
The whole point is what good is a competitor who doesn't compete? It's competition that you're actually seeing but one offering a better product right now.
Are you suggesting that they buy xbox to avoid this "circle jerk" or what? No price cuts on the console, no new hardware to compete with Pro, no availability of base hardware. How can a console that is struggling be priced higher than the more popular one during the holiday period and expect to sell?
Point is Sony have competition in the form of one of the biggest companies in the world but what good is that when xbox is shite at competing. What do you want people to do exactly?
It certainly isn't anti consumer to not have those things.Touch & motion controls are more common than the d-pad & analog stick nowadays it doesn't matter how you feel about them they are common features in consumer products but Xbox Controller didn't support these features.
And anybody with any reading comprehension should understand that MS didn't exactly die, it chooses to not compete. soAny basic reading comprehension ability should understand all I'm saying is that it's in poor taste to celebrate a major competitor dying, as it will lead to nothing but harm for the consumer. Whoever was capable of pulling "bailing out" out of what i said, I've got no idea how to respond to that.
No one is suggesting the consumer keep them around. Just not celebrate it's death. Reading is not hard. Do i want the consumer to keep amd around in high end gpu's? No. Not if they aren't going to comptete there. Would i rather celebrate them doing poorly in crclejerk fashion or hope the actually nut up and compete? Nut up and compete. No matter how badly you want what i said to be about bailing them out, it isnt.And anybody with any reading comprehension should understand that MS didn't exactly die, it chooses to not compete. soYeulEmeralda telling you
"A competitor who doesn't compete is pretty useless no?"
Is in a way asking you "why would the consumer keep them around?". You don't seem to get this though.
Yes, reading is not hard so I'm not sure why you keep trying to suggest I'm saying you said you want people to bail them out, when I literally said nobody has said that. I'm questioning why you don't understand this very simple post and its point:No one is suggesting the consumer keep them around. Just not celebrate it's death. Reading is not hard. Do i want the consumer to keep amd around in high end gpu's? No. Not if they aren't going to comptete there. Would i rather celebrate them doing poorly in crclejerk fashion or hope the actually nut up and compete? Nut up and compete. No matter how badly you want what i said to be about bailing them out, it isnt.
So are we not talking about my first point? I'm not sure why you're continually bothering me. I'm just of the stance of dont celebrate an industry death. Don't bother responding, because I wont.Yes, reading is not hard so I'm not sure why you keep trying to suggest I'm saying you said you want people to bail them out, when I literally said nobody has said that. I'm questioning why you don't understand this very simple post and its point:
"A competitor who doesn't compete is pretty useless no?"
This has nothing to do with "celebrating its death" or anything. It's just making a point that a competitor who chooses not to offer anything good is pretty pointless to the consumer and I'm asking what exactly you expect the consumer to do.
We're talking about the question that you askedSo are we not talking about my first point? I'm not sure why you're continually bothering me. I'm just of the stance of dont celebrate an industry death. Don't bother responding, because I wont.
Obviously. What's your point?
Incorrect. I dont want sympathy for anyone or any company. I want viable competition and think it's embarrassing to celebrate the demise of it.We're talking about the question that you asked
And the answer is not that difficult but you're really trying hard to make it about sympathy for a multitrillion dollar company. I get why now. thank you for not responding anymore.
Could have fooled me with your constant "sonyGAF" accusations over the years. Also funny in hindsight now that you're feigning sympathy:Incorrect. I dont want sympathy for anyone or any company. I want viable competition and think it's embarrassing to celebrate the demise of it.
Things have changed, obviously. I must've struck a nerve for you to go dig back in 2023 post history. Glad to hear it.Could have fooled me with your constant "sonyGAF" accusations over the years. Also funny in hindsight now that you're feigning sympathy:
![]()
No nerves struck. I just remember and realised your "sonyGaf" shenanigans to not be fooled by what you're doing here again suggesting a "circlejerk" is occuring because of this article and trying to plead to 'concerns' of competition. I'm glad threads like this continue to hit a nerve with you though. Here's to many more.Things have changed, obviously. I must've struck a nerve for you to go dig back in 2023 post history. Glad to hear it.
You can consider my nerves hit when I go through year old post history. Thank you.No nerves struck. I just remember and realised your "sonyGaf" shenanigans to not be fooled by what you're doing here again suggesting a "circlejerk" is occuring because of this article and trying to plead to 'concerns' of competition. I'm glad threads like this continue to hit a nerve with you though. Here's to many more.
You don't seem to understand, we are not celebrating failure; we are celebrating punishment for failure. For 2 gaming generations too long the Xbox was kept alive with outside money without merit. We are now celebrating something that was delayed far too long; the destruction of bad company practices.Incorrect. I dont want sympathy for anyone or any company. I want viable competition and think it's embarrassing to celebrate the demise of it.
No need, I'll do it for you. here's the thread that I remembered your shenanigans fromYou can consider my nerves hit when I go through year old post history. Thank you.
Amazon sounds even worse tbhYou don't seem to understand, we are not celebrating failure; we are celebrating punishment for failure. For 2 gaming generations too long the Xbox was kept alive with outside money without merit. We are now celebrating something that was delayed far too long; the destruction of bad company practices.
Do you know why the "viable competition" had been missing? Not because Xbox and Spencer had been walking failures. But because Xbox and Spencer had been GETTING AWAY with being walking failures. We are celebrating the power of the market finally removing the zombified corpse of the Xbox Division, so that others like Amazon can take their place and bring fresh competition.
Did you think competition is about keeping the loser around indefinitely? Do you really believe that? You need to go pick up a Wikipedia article on what "market competition" meant. And always we should celebrate when losers go away, that is how we get new blood.
I was there when Sony announced that they want to make a game console. I was as skeptical about Sony back then, as you are now about Amazon.Amazon sounds even worse tbh
At least with Sony and early Xbox there were people passionate about games and high quality games could be made on a reasonable schedule and budget to break into the market and it was still a major risk. With todays budgets and dev times the risk is 100 times higher. If Amazon wants to enter it would be smarter and easier to be a 3rd party publisher than to run their own platform, but honestly I don't see Bezos being interested in this low margin business.I was there when Sony announced that they want to make a game console. I was as skeptical about Sony back then, as you are now about Amazon.
There is no certainty that Amazon could make it work, but at least we are getting NEW people int the ring. Note that they hired one of the original developers of 1st generation Xbox. The chances are low, but I would still give Amazon a chance over the confirmed failures that was the Xbox Division.
Right now Sony is giving PlayStation 2 billion dollars a year as their budget. That is pocket change for Amazon. The Console Business is complicate, hard, but NOT expensive. Mi8crosoft tried to buy their way to victory but they failed. Amazon can succeed with far less money if they have the right people.At least with Sony and early Xbox there were people passionate about games and high quality games could be made on a reasonable schedule and budget to break into the market and it was still a major risk. With todays budgets and dev times the risk is 100 times higher. If Amazon wants to enter it would be smarter and easier to be a 3rd party publisher than to run their own platform, but honestly I don't see Bezos being interested in this low margin business.
Finding the right people seems to be the biggest problem these days, a problem I don't see them solving. They should start by releasing some games, see if they like the general ideaRight now Sony is giving PlayStation 2 billion dollars a year as their budget. That is pocket change for Amazon. The Console Business is complicate, hard, but NOT expensive. Mi8crosoft tried to buy their way to victory but they failed. Amazon can succeed with far less money if they have the right people.
Right now Sony is giving PlayStation 2 billion dollars a year as their budget. That is pocket change for Amazon. The Console Business is complicate, hard, but NOT expensive. Mi8crosoft tried to buy their way to victory but they failed. Amazon can succeed with far less money if they have the right people.
Let's see, what we get from major competitor dying - Gears and Forza, along with Bethesda and ATVI games on playstation. XSS is no longer an anchor dragging down the whole industry down. No more "outbidding competitor" and discounting industry via heavily subsidized gamepass.Any basic reading comprehension ability should understand all I'm saying is that it's in poor taste to celebrate a major competitor dying, as it will lead to nothing but harm for the consumer. Whoever was capable of pulling "bailing out" out of what i said, I've got no idea how to respond to that.
There is always a First Time.You think amazon can succeed in the console market? What fucking year is this?
What's the point for Amazon to enter market? They have zero synergy to itThere is always a First Time.
They tried to compete with Steam and failed (with most people failing to notice they even tried). It may be easier to just have their own Console Platform.What's the point for Amazon to enter market? They have zero synergy to it
And they have no infrastructure for it - no real experience on hardware front and no software, their gaming division focused heavily on live service games
People just can’t admit that MS tried to do something and failed. They never “lose”. It’s always just the next step of their master plan.When people start saying that Microsoft gave up on consoles, it sounds like a power move from a chess grandmaster, grasping a future no one can see. But the reality is that Microsoft tried for years to be the market leader. Game Pass was their Hail Mary, an attempt to outspend Sony on marketing. But just throwing money at the problem wasn't enough. Now, they have this ridiculous façade, doubling down on a strategy that hurt them and will continue to hurt them until they drop their hubris and tune Game Pass to be a lucrative business.
My point is that if Xbox consoles disappeared tomorrow it wouldn't matter to Sony.Obviously. What's your point?