Like always having the best version of a game. The Xbox one X was significantly more powerful than the ps4 pro and it was reflected across the internet. That was a net win for Xbox and the only reason they stayed competitive. MS greatest strength is its wallet. If they want to continue being in the hardware business they need to make sure they ALWAYS have the most powerful platform. That was always the easy win for MS and they screwed it up twice in a row.
I can see EGS doing stuff to help out, they need share and if Xbox is offering theirs, then why not?This is actually why I think if there is ANY alternative storefront support on future Xbox hardware, it's going to come through running the required Windows code through Xbox OS, I guess through some translation layer, in a sort of protected mode. However, the applications have all normal access to system resources the way code written for Xbox OS does.
Basically, any compatibility with Steam, or even EGS etc., would be 100% on Microsoft's end with a method like this, because I don't see Valve or Epic bothering whatsoever to write Xbox OS-compliant versions of their storefronts for Xbox. Why would they? It's a much bigger benefit for Microsoft than it is for either of them, so they aren't going to get the returns for the work that'd be required. Very lopsided dynamic there.
Well I do have an engineering degree fwiw in manufacturing. Don't really use it though and don't pretend to be an expert. Also I suspect the number of people with actual experience developing consoles is vanishingly small.Are you an engineering expert? Have experience in developing consoles ?
Apparently they gave up on that because they couldn't develop a low profile OS to run on it.Does this release before or after the Xbox streaming stick?
They need to shift their corporate culture around xbox. They have had little brother syndrome for too long, they need to find out what they're good at in terms of games that they make (i'd say that right now it's shooters and wrpgs) and find a way to concentrate on pushing the industry forward as game makers, not as "we're the green version of playstation".They do need to clean house with not only Spencer but their line of succession does not inspire confidence they can turn things around imo
Rumors of ARM powered Xbox. Windows now runs on ARM. New Xbox coming…. All lining up.
In theory, ARM processors are more power efficient. Therefore, they can offer better performance than a x86 processor at the same power level. Again, theoretically, this would also let Microsoft launch a console and handheld running on the same processor, which simplifies supply chain issues and simplifies porting gaming from console to a mobile device.What advantage is there for ARM? I don’t believe it
The only chance MS's console strategy will provide an advantage over PlayStation is if they launch 1-2 years early. It's what enabled the X360s early success. If it launched day and date with PS3, it wouldn't have gotten anywhere near the marketshare it did.
If they launch the Xbox 5 next year, or in 2026 with a strong, exclusive lineup - I think they could become competitive with Sony again.
Will they though? I don't know if they're clever enough.
Also with AI onboard, it could be the first fully AI console (not only used for upscaling) - sort of in lines with Sarah Bond statements about tech/gen leap. What does it exactly means - I have no idea. I know MS already got an upscaler running on ARM (that upscale every game without any need from dev input), have not idea what else they might be cooking. Maybe something like Ai game hints, when you are stuck, AI next game recommendations, AI NPC’s (that could be fun), AI procedurally generated worlds and quests/missions, so no play through is the same etc. But it always customised to your play style, maybe come back of proper physics in games (destruction), Lots of possibilities.In theory, ARM processors are more power efficient. Therefore, they can offer better performance than a x86 processor at the same power level. Again, theoretically, this would also let Microsoft launch a console and handheld running on the same processor, which simplifies supply chain issues and simplifies porting gaming from console to a mobile device.
With my steam deck + windows + playnite I felt the same. Had all my libraries connected into one interface.I basically already consider my ROG ally a handheld Xbox. Except it can also load my steam library…… now if only MS would make a console that does that lil party trick too…..
Same, armoury crate is not horrible, but we need MS to release stream lined version of Windows for handhelds, just give us Xbox overlay on handhelds.I basically already consider my ROG ally a handheld Xbox. Except it can also load my steam library…… now if only MS would make a console that does that lil party trick too…..
Mine is collecting dust since I have got Rog Ally X.With my steam deck + windows + playnite I felt the same. Had all my libraries connected into one interface.
By that logic next generation Xbox redundant after less than 2 years. Sony have a wide margin to cut the pro price going forward. They could easily slash a hundred off it next holiday.PS5 Pro redundant after less than 12 months
all will be digital next gen.Will stick to whatever platform commits to supporting physical media and traditional ownership of said media.
all will be digital next gen.
The same strategy they've had ever since Spencer got put in charge. Keep throwing things at the wall and see what sticks. Begs the question : how slippery are those walls in Redmond.“Sir our hardware share is tanking, no one wants to buy our consoles”
“Release a new console as soon as possible”
What is this strategy called?
Hilarious when the most graphically impressive games of that gen were PS4 exclusive. Power means nothing at all, its the library that matters and Xbox doesnt have that.Like always having the best version of a game. The Xbox one X was significantly more powerful than the ps4 pro and it was reflected across the internet. That was a net win for Xbox and the only reason they stayed competitive. MS greatest strength is its wallet. If they want to continue being in the hardware business they need to make sure they ALWAYS have the most powerful platform. That was always the easy win for MS and they screwed it up twice in a row.
I dislike these pissant clever comments. I DON'T GAME ON PC!!!! OK?lol xbox 2026 why? just get a PC or Asus Rog now
Is it even POSSIBLE to have next gen AAA exclusives not just ready, but finished two years ahead of time?The only chance MS's console strategy will provide an advantage over PlayStation is if they launch 1-2 years early. It's what enabled the X360s early success. If it launched day and date with PS3, it wouldn't have gotten anywhere near the marketshare it did.
If they launch the Xbox 5 next year, or in 2026 with a strong, exclusive lineup - I think they could become competitive with Sony again.
Will they though? I don't know if they're clever enough.
Didn't Phil recently said there's no need for a mid-gen upgrade? Also he pointed the distant future for the handheld. So what exactly the fuck is coming next year?
That's why it's not likely next year.Microsoft's console gaming strategy is complete wack.
Their vision of a hext gen upgrade. Not a problem console.
I still think 2026 but I'm interested to see what they have.
By problem consoles he means series s...I'm sure.Knowing the poster, I don't think I have ever seen a more hypocritical post in my entire life .. holy shit
Troll moreTheir vision of a hext gen upgrade. Not a problem console.
It's funny that you probably won't understand the irony of your post.Knowing the poster, I don't think I have ever seen a more hypocritical post in my entire life .. holy shit
By problem consoles he means series s...I'm sure.
I mean you'd have to be really silly to cap for that potatoe right?
At least Im not a hypocrite, Im consistent whether you liked my posts or not!It's funny that you probably won't understand the irony of your post.
and +1 stay tunedIt looks like 10th gen is coming next year with new Nintendo and Xbox consoles. Too bad I couldn't care any less.
I might buy it if it was a fair bit more powerful than the PRO but I don't see how Microsoft does that without it being $800 all digital. I just can't see them doing that. It would be good for competition though otherwise Sony will have complete dominance at the high end. I would like one to exist just so Sony will be more likely to lower the price of the PRO and stick a disc drive in.
I’d skip the beefier machine next year and just redesign the S to be much smaller and cut the price. Although as a console lover, I’d love to see them release their own, more powerful console next year that can push beyond the PS5 Pro and open the doors for a crazy next gen.
seems xbox don't need a new console next year, just have to go all in on the unquestionable little beast.By problem consoles he means series s...I'm sure.
I mean you'd have to be really silly to cap for that potatoe right?
They don't think like that. Everything is a gigantic game of cause and effect, the current xbox failed in the middle of the gen, so to save what's left of the market share they need to do something urgently, there is no choice, the ideal is to become full third party but maybe they think that a new xbox will have a different fate, they are fools.Probably they feel getting a 1-2 year head start is the only way they can compete.