• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PlayStation’s first Remote Play dedicated device, PlayStation Portal remote player, to launch later this year at $199.99

I'm sorry, what????? Can't even run basic games like Vampire Survivors or Into The Breach for plane rides?

All I can say is the price seems right for what is basically a PS controller with a screen glued on, but why would you ever buy this if you aren't already so locked into the PS ecosystem?

In case you didn't know. It's always been announced as a PS5 ACCESSORY, not a stand-alone device...

If you don't own a PS5, this device is not for you
 
I want it but that's not an ideal price.

Wonder how the latency compares to normal remote play.

It's just as bad. You can see it in the IGN Preview video - 4:48 when he's using the Portal to select which games to play, there's a very noticeable .2 -.5 second lag, and he was sitting unobstructedly right in front of the PS5. That's unplayable for me.
 
Last edited:

tmlDan

Member
really should have added cloud play to this to make it a more enticing product......even without 5G it would have been nice

It's just as bad. You can see it in the IGN Preview video - 4:48 when he's using the Portal to select which games to play, there's a very noticeable .2 -.5 second lag, and he was sitting unobstructedly right in front of the PS5. That's unplayable for me.

it's never had input lag that bad for me when i use it at home on my phone
 
Last edited:

mrcroket

Member
It’s not a good price when you factor:

1) You need a PS5 In order for the thing to function.
2) No cloud gaming support.
3) It only connects to WiFi.

I’m sure there are some with families who would use it, but this seems incredibly niche for the price.

Well it's a PS5 accesory so obviously you need a PS5. Just a dualsense cost $79, now add a 8" fullhd display, a big battery, an arm chip and wifi.

The cloud gaming would be great but this device is more like a second portable display with a controller integrated, and likely to be used near a router.
 
Last edited:

SmokedMeat

Gamer™
Never saw the appeal to remote play. Tried it on Vita, and I can currently do it through my phone and TV.
It just bugs me that my hardware is on and running while I’m playing.

Cloud gaming is another story. That I’d be more accepting of.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
That IGN review is really wrong about price comparison regarding the Switch, yes PS Portal is less expensive but you have to buy a PS5 in order for it to even function.

So you have to compare the Switch to the PS Portal + PS5 combo and not only the Portal...

We are near 650€ total for nothing really ground breaking... No streaming PS Plus possibility is a deal breaker to me.

The PS Portal is NOT for non-PS5 gamers. It's literally ONLY for people that already have a PS5. How can some of yall not understand this?
 

Filben

Member
Not for me because I'm not living in a three floor mansion with three bedrooms and don't have kids I have to share a TV with.
 
Well it's a PS5 accesory so obviously you need a PS5. Just a dualsense cost $79, now add a 8" fullhd display, a big battery, an arm chip and wifi.

The cloud gaming would be great but this device is more like a second portable display with a controller integrated, and likely to be used near a router.

Cloud gaming is a software thing, they can add it later if they want to...

Unless they think the latency of Remote Play + Cloud would degrade the experience too much...
 
Last edited:

philz

Member
The only thing that matters to me is that the experience isn’t compromised by input lag like every other streaming setup is (barring the Wii U). Previews sound positive in this regard. In for one.
 

Bond007

Member
I called it.
Said it looked like it was worth $150 because the 3rd party ones are $100. Add a $50 Sony first party premium and we are at $200.

This isnt a success/fail sort of item. You either find use and value for it or you dont need it at all.
 

mrmustard

Banned
I think it's too expensive for what it is, but i'm not the target group anyways. The day gaming is streaming only is the day i stop gaming new games.
 
Last edited:

RoadHazard

Gold Member
This thing is really only gonna support remote play, not cloud streaming? I really don't understand that, at all. Technically this should be pretty much the same thing as far as this device is concerned, no? But they've just decided to make it almost entirely useless for some reason? Again, I don't understand this at all.
 

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
PULSE ELITE OMG I AM GETTING IT.
I love my pulse 3d. I cannot wait to get elite ! Love the design.

And the Playstation Portla is a good idea. PS5 quality games in you hand, all around your home. Same saves and everything. Why play shitty quality 720p30fps games while you can play 1080p60 full ps5 quality. Just in your home. Not that many of you take portables out of the home.

That said - feels a bit lifeless for a reveal. Where is psp magic gone ?!
 
Definitely in for the Explore earbuds, sometimes I need headphones with a speaker and can't stand headphone hair. My fingers are crossed on the sound quality, I'm hoping it's at least at the level of the Pulse but hoping for better!

I was thinking $150-$200 for the Portal, wishing it would be $150... but $200 isn't the worst thing ever. Still would have been a pass for me, even at $150, just not the way I want to play games rn.
 
Last edited:

Thabass

Member
Well it's a PS5 accesory so obviously you need a PS5. Just a dualsense cost $79, now add a 8" fullhd display, a big battery, an arm chip and wifi.

The cloud gaming would be great but this device is more like a second portable display with a controller integrated, and likely to be used near a router.
Yeah that's why I feel it's niche. Not many people will buy this in my opinion, but hey, I've been wrong before.
 

Sleepwalker

Member
Why compare it to a controller? Compare it to another streaming device like the ones from Razer or Logitech.
Regarding this comparison

A 64gb refurbished steam deck is around $300 and can stream your ps5 (even premium probably), play games natively and the thumbsticks can be replaced with a hall effect sensor kit!

(Yes this is a sponsored post by GabeN)
 

SenkiDala

Member
How much was the Wii U GamePad sold for?

I'm curious
100€, I dunno in dollars. PlayStation Portal is 220€.

About the price... Well it is a bad price but that's not the worst.

- No bluetooth for headphones EVEN THE OFFICIAL 299€ INZONE HEADPHONES ? WAT?
- No cloud gaming ? Even they just announced "we will have a revolutionary cloud blabla with this and that"? Just remote play with your PS5 turned off in your phone ?
- So it won't work on hostel wifi and airports wifi...

So basically it'll work in your home or the home of your friends, family...

Congrats to Sony for releasing a dumbest product than the PSP Go at its time.
 

DryvBy

Gold Member
I get 300 down on my home Internet and the PS5 says my internet's too slow to stream games, won't even try to launch games, where as I stream Gamepass games perfectly with the occasional minor hitch on Series X and PC. I'm in Maine, when I lived in WA PSPlus streaming would actually launch but it wasn't great.

I'm glad it works well for you, but for many people, myself included, it's a really subpar service. I haven't tried it on PC though, I should do that before passing too much judgement.
Try it again. First time I tried the Remote Play it was a pile of crap.
 

K2D

Banned
With DualSense being $70(?) MSRB, and a screen being around $50(?) of the shelf, maybe a more sensible price would be ~120 bucks..?
 
Top Bottom