ChiefDada
Gold Member
Such an underrated movie.
Sponsored by Godfall??? And then sponsored by Nvidia.....And here's a list of a bunch of different Playstation-sponsored videos they've done:
????
Oopsie, I forgot TLOU2 got a remaster. I was thinking of the original release in 2020The Last of Us Part I › September 2, 2022
The Last of Us Part II Remastered › January 19, 2024
If it was just the hair then it probably would be a glitch, but given the difference in the lower teeth position and the upper teeth gum to the right of the front two teeth being occluded by the upper lip on the Pro, it looks more like a different frame, model or code update with a frustum/camera change on the Pro.And in some cases shows a rare glitch.
PC is becoming really inefficient for gaming. Will be obsolete in a few years.
Pretty sure it was a DF PCMR acolyte ( analog_future ) that bumped the thread from stasis to throw shade at the Pro's PSSR with another laughable DF video take,PaintTinJr will never surrender!
It's definitely a glitch since the "fuzz" artifacts cut off unnaturally halfway down the jawline. I wouldn't worry since these things will naturally get ironed out over time.If it was just the hair then it probably would be a glitch, but given the difference in the lower teeth position and the upper teeth gum to the right of the front two teeth being occluded by the upper lip on the Pro, it looks more like a different frame, model or code update with a frustum/camera change on the Pro.
This thread's still going on?
Haven't the PS fanboiz been utterly slaughtered already?
Near the ear just above a sideburn height is a natural height for sweeping tied back non-male hair, and the reason this would be visible on the Pro would be due to an increased FOV, which because AA/AAA game engines render a parallax FOV - like human vision looks in the brain - by default so the render doesn't look flat to our parallax vision looking at a 2D flat display, and instead allows us to see both sides of things slightly like our vision would allow us looking at a diorama of the game world scene.It's definitely a glitch since the "fuzz" artifacts cut off unnaturally halfway down the jawline. I wouldn't worry since these things will naturally get ironed out over time.
Sounds like we need to get a dental surgeon in this thread for a real analysis.If it was just the hair then it probably would be a glitch, but given the difference in the lower teeth position and the upper teeth gum to the right of the front two teeth being occluded by the upper lip on the Pro, it looks more like a different frame, model or code update with a frustum/camera change on the Pro.
Exactly. Every time I see this thread I am like why this isn’t locked yet. How much of a beating these PS fanboys needs to lay flat on the ground lolThis thread's still going on?
Haven't the PS fanboiz been utterly slaughtered already?
Or just engage your brain and think that developers adding PSSR and porting to Pro will add other subtle changes to make the game the best it can be to reignite sales; especially PlayStation first party devs.Sounds like we need to get a dental surgeon in this thread for a real analysis.
I get it. If there is a difference in image quality for the worse it must be because of some other change unrelated to PSSR.Or just engage your brain and think that developers adding PSSR and porting to Pro will add other subtle changes to make the game the best it can be to reignite sales; especially PlayStation first party devs.
Who said it is for the worse? All the images are fine in pure rendering terms, but the last one has the least discontinuities at that massively zoomed in position and probably the best parallax representation, even if so minimal it is only worth mentioning when people are being hyper critical.I get it. If there is a difference in image quality for the worse it must be because of some other change unrelated to PSSR.
If you wait for DF's review, you don't have to wait, cough, results are obvious upfront."appears"?
How about we wait until the thing releases so that some thorough comparisons can be done using retail units?
FSR 1, the spacial upscaler that all, bar green shitholes like DF have praised, is improving my user experience with Steam Deck from time to time.Zatalus said:How is FSR 1 doing these days
That's how reputation works, dumdum.Zatalus said:complaints about DF and Nvidia from years ago
SpokkX said:FSR … is shit
1 was worse that whatever AA already out there and even the latest 3.1 looks absolutely terrible, especially in motion
Who said we were talking about the image quality overall? The subject was the appearance of a particular haloing effect, which apparently we must attribute to loading a new model (or some other "change"), even though there is no point in the original footage at which a model appears to load in and the haloing is seen throughout the entire clip.Who said it is for the worse? All the images are fine in pure rendering terms, but the last one has the least discontinuities at that massively zoomed in position and probably the best parallax representation, even if so minimal it is only worth mentioning when people are being hyper critical.
You misunderstood, not loading a new model in the scene - I was meaning the Pro version may have a revised updated model that is just subtly different from the PS5 model.Who said we were talking about the image quality overall? The subject was the appearance of a particular haloing effect, which apparently we must attribute to loading a new model (or some other "change"), even though there is no point in the original footage at which a model appears to load in and the haloing is seen throughout the entire clip.
(Naughty Dog must be reserving these "special changes" for the PSSR mode, since the issue was not seen in the Performance or Fidelity mode. So they don't want you to have the imperceptibly different model that will sell more PS5 Pros in the regular modes?)
Did you just step out of a cryo chamber? It’s almost 2025. You haven’t posted regularly since 2021 and you’re here derailing the thread posting irrelevant drivel about shit from 2020.When Mr Huang lied about 3080 being 2 times faster than 2080, what did DF do?
That is hardly surprising.(I feel uncomfortable when someone is noting DF reputation issues)
In the video, it is introduced as one example of haloing. Listening back, Oliver also says the same effect is seen in the other modes but at different points. If it's hair, then Abby has hair only on the very edge of her face and only up to where her jaw is.You are calling it a haloing, but it is hair, just hair not visible on older different frustum configs.
Zatalus said:Who cares? FSR 1 was, and still remains, dog shit. No amount of game settings will make it anything better than a spatial upscaler.
Did a bot take over this poster's account? Should we report it?When DF reviewer messed with not normally exposed game settings and essentially faked the FSR 1 review, botching the image, did they apologize or double down?
You absolutely should.Should we stop talking about ourselves in plural?
DF say lots and lots of things that are absolute garbage, but the picture as presented doesn't look like haloing. If there are other ones that are, post them and we'll have a decent discussion about them on merit for what they are, and are not.In the video, it is introduced as one example of haloing. Listening back, Oliver also says the same effect is seen in the other modes but at different points. If it's hair, then Abby has hair only on the very edge of her face and only up to where her jaw is.
It's a video, not a picture.DF say lots and lots of things that are absolute garbage, but the picture as presented doesn't look like haloing. If there are other ones that are, post them and we'll have a decent discussion about them on merit for what they are, and are not.
It's a video, not a picture.
Who cares? FSR 1 was, and still remains, dog shit. No amount of game settings will make it anything better than a spatial upscaler.When DF reviewer messed with not normally exposed game settings and essentially faked the FSR 1 review, botching the image, did they apologize or double down?
The majority of PC gamers in the world that aren't using steam and playing on a laptop with integrated graphics that can actually use FSR's in a transformative way, that's who.Who cares? FSR 1 was, and still remains, dog shit. No amount of game settings will make it anything better than a spatial upscaler.
You asked me to provide the source and I did. Feel free to post your opinions about whether the momentary white outline on Abby's face still seems like hair. (We can come back to the subject once more footage emerges).Well obviously we all knew that, so how would that change anything I said about them talking rubbish and presenting new images- obviously captured from the video - to discuss them on merit?
Most of those people are playing indie 2D browser games or Solitaire. Why would they care about FSR?The majority of PC gamers in the world that aren't using steam and playing on a laptop with integrated graphics that can actually use FSR's in a transformative way, that's who.
The lines aren't white. they are the colour of her other hair too.You asked me to provide the source and I did. Feel free to post your opinions about whether the momentary white outline on Abby's face still seems like hair. (We can come back to the subject once more footage emerges).
PC gamers that don’t use Steam I can get, after all lots of major PC games are not on it. PC gamers that are not on Steam and rely on integrated graphics probably don’t even know what FSR is or would even really need it.The majority of PC gamers in the world that aren't using steam and playing on a laptop with integrated graphics that can actually use FSR's in a transformative way, that's who.
Minecraft is one of the biggest games in the world and FSR unlocks the ability to use shaders or play at much higher resolution and frame-rate on laptop, and the same will be true of FPS games.Most of those people are playing indie 2D browser games or Solitaire. Why would they care about FSR?
It's a bit all over the place because the mode using PSSR is locked to 60. There's the unlocked frame rate mode that should still be available, but will it use PSSR? If not, you'll just see the game going from 60-80fps to 80-110fps but without the improved IQ. I guess that'd be a cool pseudo-120Hz mode, but the CPU might start to struggle at those frame rates.I'd like to better understand where/how the additional 45% GPU power is being applied because many of the games implementing PSSR have simply adopted the performance mode of base PS5 without improving graphics. In the case of TLOU, what once took them 16.67ms/frame should now take them 11.5ms/frame; taking 2ms PSSR budget into account, that would equate to a theoretical render budget of 13.5ms with 3ms+ to spare, which is a LOT for 60fps budget. Now someone may counter by saying "up to 45% GPU lift", but my response would be that both TLOU Remastered and TLOU Pt. 1 both run ~75fps range most of the time so I am actually being conservative with my numbers (By extension, we should be seeing TLOU games easily running 100fps+ on average in the modes DF has been testing).
For games like Spider-Man and Ratchet, it's even more mind boggling because they already had render budget reserved for ITGI, so net PSSR cost should be more favorable. So again I ask, where is the additional power going??
Most of them play Minecraft through their browsers or tablets where FSR is a non-factor. You're addressing a non-problem.Minecraft is one of the biggest games in the world and FSR unlocks the ability to use shaders or play at much higher resolution and frame-rate on laptop, and the same will be true of FPS games.
I misspoke, since they actually look more skin coloured to me. But I'm not going to resort to checking RGB values at various points at Abby's face, since the discussion will simply shift to some other element, without acknowledging that the "hair" only appears at a particular part of the edge of Abby's face, like a kind of "mane".The lines aren't white. they are the colour of her other hair too.
Shouldn't even need to magic wand select them with small 10% error margin to determine that, you should be able to eyeball it straight from the picture.
Naughty Dog
I don't know what to tell you other than it looks like a perfectly normal expected result from a parallax rendered image of that human. Even the title image for the video has a similar side profile picture with visible hair in that location.I misspoke, since they actually look more skin coloured to me. But I'm not going to resort to checking RGB values at various points at Abby's face, since the discussion will simply shift to some other element, without acknowledging that the "hair" only appears at a particular part of the edge of Abby's face, like a kind of "mane".
Spot on. I cannot believe some people complaining over whether something will remain at 120 or 60 or whatever! Since when did we become such knobs over shit like this? People waiting for digital foundry to tell them whether something stays at 60 for 99% of the time or not is insane!I don't get it. I'm getting the PS5 Pro because I like PS5 and want to play it in the best light, not because I seriously think it is going to compare to a GPU that is in a PC build that is a good four to five times more expensive.
It's a bit all over the place because the mode using PSSR is locked to 60. There's the unlocked frame rate mode that should still be available, but will it use PSSR? If not, you'll just see the game going from 60-80fps to 80-110fps but without the improved IQ. I guess that'd be a cool pseudo-120Hz mode, but the CPU might start to struggle at those frame rates.
Perhaps, but it's capped, isn't it? Will the uncapped mode remain or did they get rid of all the modes and just kept 1440p upscaled to 4K using PSSR?I'm saying what they showed us with PSSR should be hitting ~100fps average when uncapped.
I think NxGamer tested Uncharted 4 on his 3700x and 6800 and he was apparently running into CPU issues at around 110fps. Whatever engine ND is using is much better optimized on consoles, so it could perform comparatively a lot better on PS5/Pro. The 3700x is faster than what the consoles have though, so it's important to keep that in mind. It might not even be necessarily that the CPU isn't fast enough either. Could be that the thread usage maxes out the main ones at 100fps+ because the engine just wasn't designed around hitting those frame rates. I'm just speculating.It should be plenty horsepower from CPU and GPU to get us there and these are last gen games so CPU shouldn't struggle much at all.
Dude, did you put PS5 Pro and 4090 in the same sentence? For what?
Well here for example there is no extra hair I can see:I don't know what to tell you other than it looks like a perfectly normal expected result from a parallax rendered image of that human. Even the title image for the video has a similar side profile picture with visible hair in that location.