Haint
Member
Can anyone explain the difference between the LG B7 and C7?
There is also a B7A and B7P. The A loses the internal Atmos speakers but is otherwise the same. The P has internal Atmos speakers.
Can anyone explain the difference between the LG B7 and C7?
But then your suggestion is that the flaw of peak brightness not being as high somehow supersedes the obvious benefits of OLED in almost every other regard. Your basically saying its not perfect so choose something less perfect or am I incorrect in that assumption?
So I'm looking to get a 4K monitor, specifically this one:
Acer ET430Kwmiippx 43"4K2K IPS LED Monitor with 2xHDMI, DP, miniDP, DPOut, USB3.0 Hub, Acer EcoDisplay https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01KCLMFEK/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_qeMXzbMJSZF41
It's for use for PC and Xbox One X. I've read several posts stating this has something close to HDR. Anyone got one?
I'd be astounded to see a replacement for the Z9D.
It lagged behind OLEDs in both the ISF and HDTVtest shootouts and I saw an article that Sony is planning to double their order of OLED panels from LGD for next year.
True, OLED has flaws and isn't taking over the world today, but "not a chance" seems like verbiage a bit too strong...
Anyone on the above? I can't find barely any reviews etc.![]()
Eh, I think the perfect blacks of the OLED more than makeup for a slight shortcoming in brightness. My KS8000 got like 600 nits brighter than my OLED but I find the latter far more impressive. Even HDR content I'd already seen on the KS8000 has made my jaw drop on the OLED.
I always have light control in my viewing room. No direct sunlight, even at mid-day. There's literally zero concern about OLED or even plasma brightness if you don't allow direct sunlight to enter your room.
Can anyone explain the difference between the LG B7 and C7?
The B7 does not have Dolby Atmos processing I believe. It does support Atmos through the built in apps, but for UHD and stuff you would need to use a receiver.
It also has a nicer looking stand and a black edge vs silver
B7 has silver edge and some say is harder to make the screen level.
C7 has black edge and a stand that is automatically level.
There are too many sets IMO. The silver edge, visible in a dim room, just feels like an artificial attribute added to push people to buy a pricier set.
I think they mean with the stand.I notice the silver edge but it's not even close to an issue IMO. It's there, just like your wall is there behind the TV.
What do you mean it's hard to make the screen level?
Yeah I checked it to make sure. Guess after so long it stops prompting.
B7 has silver edge and some say is harder to make the screen level.
C7 has black edge and a stand that is automatically level.
There are too many sets IMO. The silver edge, visible in a dim room, just feels like an artificial attribute added to push people to buy a pricier set.
I don't even see the silver edge in dark room, if you have light in the room it's not the only thing you'll see unless your wall is painted black anyway so.
I saw the HDTVTest video about the stands too and remember someone else mentioning that he couldn't get the screws properly in the stand and it would always be little tilted, but didn't have that issue myself.
The strange thing is that the B7 and C7 are the same price, at least they were when I was shopping for them.B7 has silver edge and some say is harder to make the screen level.
C7 has black edge and a stand that is automatically level.
There are too many sets IMO. The silver edge, visible in a dim room, just feels like an artificial attribute added to push people to buy a pricier set.
That must be the stand in Europe I guess, as my B7 doesn't have a crescent stand. It's a flat aluminum square'ish base, with the semi-transparent plastic piece that connects the TV to the base. This was actually the reason I went with the B7 instead of the C7 as I preferred the look of the this base over the C7 (which is similar to what is in the video).I think they mean with the stand.
Also It's worth noting the B7 has a crescent stand, while the B7A has a stand that is the same as the stand for the B6, except with out the big LGOLED logo in the middle.
The strange thing is that the B7 and C7 are the same price, at least they were when I was shopping for them.
That must be the stand in Europe I guess, as my B7 doesn't have a crescent stand. It's a flat aluminum square'ish base, with the semi-transparent plastic piece that connects the TV to the base. This was actually the reason I went with the B7 instead of the C7 as I preferred the look of the this base over the C7 (which is similar to what is in the video).
Don't forget the ZD9 isn't really a FALD, it's an edge-lit that simulates FALD backlighting.
If there's still selling points on the LCD that can't be replicated on OLED, there's a market for them. They were always intended to be the high-end option anyway.
I just can't see how that can be though, I mean OLED is a great technology n all, but that technology as it stands will end up holding it back, the HDR side of things only goes up very incrementally each year, due to the fact it has to make its own light, and has burn in to consider, whereas LCD can go crazy high if the want was there, so aside from completely new tech, FALD is the only valid one that can forge new territory.
Not a chance.
Don't forget the ZD9 isn't really a FALD, it's an edge-lit that simulates FALD backlighting. There's still plenty of room for improvement with HDR peak brightness in LCD tech. They won't give that up for OLED as long as it still has downsides compared to LCD.
¯\_(ツ_/¯
Options are good. OLED might be the future, but in the present, not everyone wants to buy into its flaws
This is incorrect. The Z9D is a FALD set.
Right. Misunderstood how it works. Thought it emulated a FALD, but it just emulates having more zones than it actually has with a complex setup.No, the Z9D is an actual FALD with hundreds of individual LEDs behind its screen. The most zones of any FALD ever made.
.
Look at 2017's displays. The only high-end LCD TVs are Samsung's edge-lit Q9/Q8. Sony, Panasonic, Philips, Toshiba, hell even the boutique brands like B&O and Loewe, have all moved to OLED. Until/if Samsung can get their emissive LCD tech ready for mass market, I don't think we will see many high-end LCD sets. Low- and mid-range stuff, LCD is great (TCl and Vizio in particular) so the technology isn't dead yet.
Maximum brightness is not the Holy Grail for many of us. More brightness for HDR is nice, and of course proper tone mapping, but LCD technology never figured out how to deliver acceptable black levels... in any light-controlled room LCDs will lose head-to-head against OLED for this reason.
No, the Z9D is an actual FALD with hundreds of individual LEDs behind its screen. The most zones of any FALD ever made.
There's always been compromise. Even CRTs had major problems with brightness and geometry/focus. Just have to decide what matters most to you.
I finally pulled the trigger on the Sony X900E. I almost went with the Sony X940E but the motion blur concerns I've read in reviews stayed my hand. I figured the 900E was the better option since the primary use will be for gaming. No planned Dolby Vision support is a shame though since I do watch a lot of movies on my current setup.
This is my first 4k HDR TV, hopefully I won't be disappointed XD
Out of curiosity, why did you not buy the XE93? More zones and DV.....price obviously wasn't an concern.
Man I love this thread. And all of you nerds who care about this shit as much as me, it's a good time.
But I want to remind everyone that the perfect TV will never exist, and there will always be something on the Horizon.
Whatever TV you decide on, from the 2016 KS samsungs, to the LG 6 and 7 series, to the high end FALD Sony and the A1E, and the more affordable 900e and 930e, you are going to get a great display. Hell even that TCL p series looks fine for the price.
Even the problems I had with the KS8000 are pretty small, and it get's surprisingly close to OLED blacks even with it's shitty local dimming. The fact is that all of these TV's are in the same ball park, your shit is gonna look outstanding on any mid/high end set. Probably the best it's ever looked. Just find one that works for you and enjoy it.
The money you spent will be irrelevant as time goes on, and life is too short to play the waiting game if you need a TV. Grab a nice display, and enjoy it. If it sucks, maybe play the panel lottery once, but if that one sucks, get a different set.
People were having these exact same conversations 10 years ago about which shitty DLP TV was better. The tech will surely get better, but we truly live in a time where affordable displays are leaps and bounds better than they have ever been. Enjoy content on a good one now, and if we're all around in 10 more years we can think about what idiots we were, arguing over which 4k HDR TV was better while we argue about which 16k FULL HDR TV is better.
Hahaha, I never had the pleasure.You gonna go ahead and act like the Pioneer Kuros never existed???
=)
Goddamn.
New Amazon fire TV has added HDR support as well as Atmos, for $70..........but no Dolby Vision.
Just check the Dolby Vision box guys. Just check it before it leaves the factory.
Man I love this thread. And all of you nerds who care about this shit as much as me, it's a good time.
But I want to remind everyone that the perfect TV will never exist, and there will always be something on the Horizon.
Whatever TV you decide on, from the 2016 KS samsungs, to the LG 6 and 7 series, to the high end FALD Sony and the A1E, and the more affordable 900e and 930e, you are going to get a great display. Hell even that TCL p series looks fine for the price.
Even the problems I had with the KS8000 are pretty small, and it get's surprisingly close to OLED blacks even with it's shitty local dimming. The fact is that all of these TV's are in the same ball park, your shit is gonna look outstanding on any mid/high end set. Probably the best it's ever looked. Just find one that works for you and enjoy it.
The money you spent will be irrelevant as time goes on, and life is too short to play the waiting game if you need a TV. Grab a nice display, and enjoy it. If it sucks, maybe play the panel lottery once, but if that one sucks, get a different set.
People were having these exact same conversations 10 years ago about which shitty DLP TV was better. The tech will surely get better, but we truly live in a time where affordable displays are leaps and bounds better than they have ever been. Enjoy content on a good one now, and if we're all around in 10 more years we can think about what idiots we were, arguing over which 4k HDR TV was better while we argue about which 16k FULL HDR TV is better.
My current setup is 75", I didn't want to go down in size.
That's a swing and a miss right there. I'd consider it for a better PS Vue client, but at this point I'm thinking YouTube TV works best for me as long as they get some device clients out. Chromecast is no go for me. I watched a sporing event on it the other day and it sucked a lot. Fast forwarding and stuff from a tablet or phone isn't good.
It doesn't. The only difference zone wise is that whereas on most FALD sets you have groups of LEDs separated into zones that are managed, the ZD9 controls individual LEDs instead, giving it 640+ for the 65" model and more on the 75 and 100" models (later is closer to 1500 iirc)Right. Misunderstood how it works. Thought it emulated a FALD, but it just emulates having more zones than it actually has with a complex setup.
Very basic questions from someone with close to no knowledge on the matter.
1. If I have the money to buy an OLED, I should, right? That offers the better image quality?
2. Is it worth sacrificing 10" by going for the LGOLED55B7A instead of a similarly priced 65X900E?
3. And lastly, If I do decide to go OLED, is it worth the extra $1000, going from the 55" to the 65" model of the LG OLED?
Very basic questions from someone with close to no knowledge on the matter.
1. If I have the money to buy an OLED, I should, right? That offers the better image quality?
2. Is it worth sacrificing 10" by going for the LGOLED55B7A instead of a similarly priced 65X900E?
3. And lastly, If I do decide to go OLED, is it worth the extra $1000, going from the 55" to the 65" model of the LG OLED?
That's a swing and a miss right there. I'd consider it for a better PS Vue client, but at this point I'm thinking YouTube TV works best for me as long as they get some device clients out. Chromecast is no go for me. I watched a sporing event on it the other day and it sucked a lot. Fast forwarding and stuff from a tablet or phone isn't good.
No HDR on that one for certain.Anyone on the above? I can't find barely any reviews etc.![]()
The only set in that specific range is the Sony 43X800D/E.
I have the D (2016), which has a VA panel vs the E (2017) which is IPS.
There is a big thread on this set.
TCL 55" C series is on sale at Costco starting tomorrow for $479, from $549. I think I'll pull the trigger on it. The screen isn't as good as the P series but I don't think my room gets dim enough where I can see the C series' screen flaws. C series also looks a whole lot better than most TV's twice its price and has front facing speakers for better sound.
Heard you can purchase with a Costco Visa card for an additional 2 yr warranty after Costco's regular 2 yr warranty and purchase Square's warranty for only $30 for another 3 more yrs.
TCL 55" C series is on sale at Costco starting tomorrow for $479, from $549. I think I'll pull the trigger on it. The screen isn't as good as the P series but I don't think my room gets dim enough where I can see the C series' screen flaws. C series also looks a whole lot better than most TV's twice its price and has front facing speakers for better sound.
Heard you can purchase with a Costco Visa card for an additional 2 yr warranty after Costco's regular 2 yr warranty and purchase Square's warranty for only $30 for another 3 more yrs.
I don't know if it's really a warranty but you can basically return electronics within 2 yrs.What is Costcos regular 2 year warranty? Never heard of that
I got the flier mailed to me this week.How do you find out about the Costco sales?
We probably aren't, since Sony and Panasonic both went all-in on OLED for their 2017 flagships. I've heard that FALD sets like these, with high zone counts, are expensive to design and manufacture, which is why Samsung has abandoned FALD. Seems like it's cheaper for them to just buy LG OLED panels for now.
End of an era.
I don't know if it's really a warranty but you can basically return electronics within 2 yrs.
I got the flier mailed to me this week.