RoadHazard
Gold Member
47 years, crazy.
In 10 years Miyamoto won't be at Nintendo anymore, and he might even be dead. That's gonna be really weird and sad.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
The Nintendo Switch 2 | Officially Announced (Switch 2 Direct Scheduled for April 2nd)
47 years, crazy.
In 10 years Miyamoto won't be at Nintendo anymore, and he might even be dead. That's gonna be really weird and sad.
NanaMiku
Member
IIRC Nintendo always releases new information on Thursday.
Darkmakaimura
Can You Imagine What SureAI Is Going To Do With Garfield?
I'm looking forward to the new Zelda.
Jinzo Prime
Member
Yeah, he might retire after the Zelda movie. What a legend.
Warspite
Member
I think it would just be ports you would hear about right now, if you have a biggish game to announce you might be better waiting till the April presentation when it will get plenty of eyeballs on it.
daclynk
Member
And lets see what Nintendo does with that PlayStation 4 power.
Last edited:
SimTourist
Member
It's at least 10 years away lol
Hudo
Member
I think they've done a fairly good job at preparing the next generation. Something which many western companies don't give a fuck about, unfortunately. A company's most valuable asset is institutional knowledge.
We've got Koizumi who is overseeing Mario, afaik. We've got Fujibayashi, who already directed key Zelda titles. We've got Aya Kyoguku and Hisashi Nogami. For AC, Splatoon etc.
Dunno what's going to happen with Metroid, tho. Since Sakamoto seems to be still fairly involved in that IP, and he's also 65 years old.
SimTourist
Member
Looking at MK9 the answer looks to be jack fucking shit
BlackTron
Member
A part of me wonders if they will want to keep him on board "essentially" retired but for the optics of having the Legend there.
Like a you were too successful to let go home type deal. You can, but there will be ninjas there to carry you back for a press release.
GoldenEye98
posts news as their odd job
That would be way off the release cadence for Zelda. ToTK came out nearly 2 years ago.
I wouldn't be surprised if a we get a new one in 4 years.
SimTourist
Member
Looking at how Totk took 6 years to make and it's essentially an expansion of Botw there is no way a proper new one will release so soon. End of Switch 2's life cycle for sure.
daclynk
Member
thats an offscreened compressed video.
Its crazy to think people don't expect a graphical leap in switch 2 games from Nintendo. This isn't a GC-Wii or WiiU-SWI situation. Its GC-WiiU leap people.
Last edited:
GoldenEye98
posts news as their odd job
Tbf BoTW was released 5.5 years after Skyward Sword despite it being a large departure design wise.
But even if total dev time is 7 years. That would be 5 years away from now...not 10.
They probably will move on from BoTW/ToTK to some degree but Nintendo not to the extent of developing a typical AAA game. They have dev time advantages in that.
Last edited:
RodriGames40
Member
People do, this trailer just happens to go against those expectations in insane fashion. No matter how much compression is in this, MK9 isn't even fucking close to what Killzone Shadow Fall/UC4/Infamous Second Son meant at the time, and the first trailers for those games were crazy compressed.thats an offscreened compressed video.
Its crazy to think people don't expect a graphical leap in switch 2 game from Nintendo. This isn't a GC-Wii or WiiU-SWI situation. Its GC-WiiU leap people.
SimTourist
Member
Well you certainly can't see any leap in that footage, compressed or not, one look at compressed video of Killzone Shadow Fall back in 2013 was enough to see that shit couldn't run on a ps3 in any capacity.thats an offscreened compressed video.
Its crazy to think people don't expect a graphical leap in switch 2 game from Nintendo. This isn't a GC-Wii or WiiU-SWI situation. Its GC-WiiU leap people.
If they move on from ps3 level graphics it's gonna take more time in any case, even being limited to ps3 level on switch they took more time than normal development in those times which was normally 2-3 years for a AAA game.
GoldenEye98
posts news as their odd job
They could probably just tweak the existing engine. I don't Nintendo is ever going full realism latest AAA graphics....even for Zelda.
SimTourist
Member
They still take too long even with ps3 level production values and a reused map and assets, but they won't be able to reuse it for a 3rd time, at least I hope so.
Thaimasker
Member
TOTK was also made during covid. And apparently they delayed it a whole year just to polish it, likely because of the new mechanics.
daclynk
Member
Im saying lets wait till game is officially announced. I can BET that footage is a early build.
RodriGames40
Member
I sincerely hope so.
daclynk
Member
Wow. just lets wait and see. Even MKWii to MK8 was a graphical leap.
RoadHazard
Gold Member
What lol. There has never been a bigger gap than 6 years between main entries. And Tears of the Kingdom is soon 2 years old.
RoadHazard
Gold Member
It's nothing like an "expansion". It reuses the base world layout, and that's pretty much it. Basically everything else is new, including several completely new gameplay systems.
SimTourist
Member
Did you miss the overall increase of dev times across the industry? That was 6 years with ps3 level production values, now imagine ps4 level.
SimTourist
Member
Yeah, that's usually what's called an expansion, like Far Cry usual expansion when the map in reused and new stuff is added on top. That usually saves a lot of time and money for the devs.
RoadHazard
Gold Member
I doubt they're gonna go crazy with asset quality and density just because they have a bit more power to work with, that's not how Nintendo operates. The next Zelda is not gonna be a GTA VI, it's not gonna take 10 years. It's gonna be higher res and have better textures, draw distance, possibly 60fps, etc. None of that should really take longer, they're just gonna be less held back than they were on the Switch. BotW and TotK already look pretty damn good emulated at 4K60 on a PC.
We can already see that MK9 looks like MK8.
SimTourist
Member
That would be a lazy approach but yeah it might happen
Stefan.North
Member
Why are they calling it Switch 2 instead of Switch Pro? Looks like Switch Pro to me 
Zathalus
Member
How is it not a Switch 2? It’s a bigger leap in CPU/GPU/RAM than the PS4->PS5 was.Why are they calling it Switch 2 instead of Switch Pro? Looks like Switch Pro to me
ManaByte
Member
Since Avi Arad is producing that (after he had such a HUGE hit with Borderlands), it might be more of a Gunpei Yokoi style retirement.
Hardensoul
Member
So 2 years away, since BotW was 8 yrs ago!!!
E-Cat
Member
Idk. Half a bj feels good
RoadHazard
Gold Member
From what we know it absolutely is not. PS4 to PS5 is 5.6x in absolute TF numbers, Switch 2 looks to be maybe 2.5x.
RAM sure, but the Switch had too little (and too slow) memory. PS4 was well balanced in that regard, as is PS5.
Last edited:
RoadHazard
Gold Member
Why even involve MS? Nintendo owns Donkey/Diddy Kong.
Stafford
Member
But doesn't Rare own the DKR ip? If not, then yeah, agreed.
Madserb2023
Member
Even though we don't know for sure, if it is really over 3TF when docked, considering the Switch 1 is around 330 ish when docked, that would be about a 10x increase.
RoadHazard
Gold Member
It's not over 3TF docked though. Not unless you double count in a way you really can't do.
And the Switch is more like 390 docked I believe.
tkscz
Member
Why are they calling it Switch 2 instead of Switch Pro? Looks like Switch Pro to me
Hudo
Member
And it was worth it, imho. I am seldom impressed by technical stuff anymore. But TotK and the robustness of its systems did impress me multiple times.
Zathalus
Member
What do you mean? Going off the assumed clocks speeds the Switch 2 is 8.7x increase in portable mode, and a 7.8x increase in docked mode. Sure, Ampere has double 32FP vs Maxwell, but on the other hand it is also a much faster architecture in general, and the double FP32 does have a big increase on performance numbers.
RAM amount is an increase of 3x, more than the 2x for PS4->PS5, and RAM speed is an increase of 3x to 4x, while PS4->PS5 was a leap of 2.5x. It’s also no worse in terms of balance of memory speed vs GPU power compared to the desktop Ampere class cards, actually better in a lot of cases.
Last edited:
Stefan.North
Member
Well then why don't they call it Switch 3?
Zathalus
Member
Gabe Newell helped design it.
Madserb2023
Member
According to the latest leak it's about 1.6TF in handheld and around 3TF when docked. Not double counting. These are based on the clocks leak. The thread was literally just on here. That would be a bigger jump in raw power.
thicc_girls_are_teh_best
Member
They're talking about Switch 2 vs PS5 trailer views and this absolute brainlet is trying to rewrite history. PS5 wasn't a "must have console" at launch? Uh, idiot!? Didn't the whole "me or PS5" thing become a viral Tiktok trend for over a year? Weren't there tons of videos of people rushing stores to get systems at launch? Wasn't the console marked up to crazy-high prices by scalpers during 2021? Didn't Kai Cenat almost cause a riot in NYC giving away a free (singular!) PS5?
Also, isn't the system already near 70 million lifetime sales? But somehow it won't sell 30 million over the next FOUR years? You know what, we need a poll tax for online game discussion, to keep people like this out of topics unless they put forward more than the bare minimum.
Like damn, I know them cancelling those two GAAS was shitty news (not so much those GAAS getting cancelled, but because it means Bluepoint & Bend won't have a new game until 2029-2030 at the earliest now that isn't yet another remaster), but you don't get to rewrite history over it FFS.
RoadHazard
Gold Member
I'm no expert here, but people who seem to have some knowledge are saying in that thread that you can't count that way and the true numbers are something like half of that.
The ~13.7 TF 3060 (Ampere) competes with the ~9.7 TF 5700 XT, which itself delivers 1.25X the performance of GCN (PS4/Xbox One) per teraflop. So you can multiply the teraflop figures by ~0.7 to get the equivalent RDNA 2 performance, or ~0.875 to get the equivalent GCN performance. If you're comparing with Switch 1, the 0.7 multiplier is probably closest as Maxwell seems to perform similarly to RDNA 2.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll