• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Too Human – Stand and be counted

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pachael

Member
sionyboy said:
Dear me, all this talk about what metacritic score decides a good game, how many copies it has to sell in NPDs.... There is only ONE man who can cut through the crap and give the ultimate thumbs-up or thumbs-down.

CropperCapture11.jpg

God?
 

FightyF

Banned
AgentOtaku said:
75% or higher = good

...if it gets that then call it a day okay?

If the haters of the game are going to pussy off and not stick with their word, I'll do it for them.

DennyD, if your game isn't shit, I'll pay $250 to the charity of your choice.


That is, if your game scores over 60%, which is pretty much what is considered shit nowadays.
 
I was already ready to play TH, but now it's a day-one purchase for me on the sole basis of DD whipping out the enormous brass balls and thumping them down on the haters' dinner table. It's one thing to tell one of the big industry press outlets at a media day that you're confident in your game - but it's another thing entirely to throw yourself into the crowd and hope that they'll catch you in the mosh pit.

Also, the game looks cool.

FOR
 

McBradders

NeoGAF: my new HOME
Some of you people need to stay on topic rather than turning this in to yet another thinly veiled round of system wars bullshit.

Just because Kittonwy posted doesn't mean you turn your guns on him. Fuck, really GAF. Really?
 

RevenantKioku

PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS oh god i am drowning in them
The only scientifically proven way to show if a game is shit or not is to give me a copy. If I like it, it is shit. If I don't, it is great.
 

J-Rzez

Member
Accidental post, guess i'll put something useful here:

Fact is, he's saying better than most, and I'm sure he's not meaning it as better than 51% of the games out there this year. When I think something is better than most games, I'm thinking along the lines of MGS4 for one example. That's a game someone can say that and I'd agree. He needs to define "most", as right now I'm winging it and going to say it's supposed to be better than MGS4 now. I do agree though, this was very very clever advertising though to generate a little hype on a game that was rapidly falling into bargain bins before the game is released.
 

barnacles

Banned
FightyF said:
If the haters of the game are going to pussy off and not stick with their word, I'll do it for them.

DennyD, if your game isn't shit, I'll pay $250 to the charity of your choice.


That is, if your game scores over 60%, which is pretty much what is considered shit nowadays.

That'd make a good box quote: " Too Human: Not shit. >60% on metacritic. GAF OWNED ".

You've obviously got a heck of a lot of faith in the game to take such a wild outrider of a risk to expect >60%. You've really shown GAF what courage is with your daredevil exploits. It's amazing, profound, and life changing. It's Pwnage with a capital P. I hope you have recorded this pulse pounding episode in your e-resume so down the ages strangers can bask in the fiery, hot, radioactive glow of your untamed heart and experience, vicariously, the impossible thrills of your incredible total victory, snatched, at the last possible second, from the maw of defeat, against all odds. Truly yours is the destiny of the ustoppable conqueror. I hope, as you sweep across the internets, in your ultimate triumph, you take a well deserved moment from your campaign to drive us beneath your feet and hear the lamentation of our women.
 

Victrix

*beard*
I have an awesome wager for this awesome thread

If your game is good, I'll buy it for... $60







(unless I find it cheaper, or it sucks)
 

Haunted

Member
:lol how did I miss this thread?


Well, the entire forum is once again talking about Too Human, so I guess Dyack's achieved his goal. >_>
 
i'm not a denis hater or too human hater at all. i like SK. but really? 10+ years of development with 2 other games to come out in that time. it's already a failure. it doesn't matter if it gets a 95. other games developed in 1/3 of the time achieved the highest scores possible with some pubs (mgs4, gta4). i just hope it's a great game so the situation isn't all bad. it's just already a failure as far as time and efficiency in manpower is concerned. SK should have put out 2-3 more games during it's development time that should have 90+ rankings. not a knock on the game more of a knock on SK in general. but like i said i like SK! so don't think i'm just saying it to be a dick or anything.
 

Uncle

Member
So in order to try to put it out some gasoline on this fire

This bit of text is confusing me. But I'm looking forward to the game although I'm waiting for a demo and/
f
or reviews first.
 

mattiewheels

And then the LORD David Bowie saith to his Son, Jonny Depp: 'Go, and spread my image amongst the cosmos. For every living thing is in anguish and only the LIGHT shall give them reprieve.'
and oh yeah......

FUCK OFF for messing up metal gear solid.
 
Another_visitor said:
Unless you're the company accountant, why should that worry you?

amount of games a talented company can put out in a certain amount of time. they could put out 3 great games in that time if they weren't dropping the ball somewhere here. so i could have 3 great games from them instead of one. by resources i didn't mean money. i meant people and equipment.
 
LizardKing said:
amount of games a talented company can put out in a certain amount of time. they could put out 3 great games in that time if they weren't dropping the ball somewhere here. so i could have 3 great games from them instead of one. by resources i didn't mean money. i meant people and equipment.
So basically you can quantify the creative process? I think you might be able to make a rather nice bit of money from that.
 

Cheerilee

Member
TheChaos said:
:lol :lol :lol It's funny 'cause it's true.

Can somebody please give me a synopsis of what happened here? Something about Dyack making a challenge to EvilLore or something. Like hell I'm reading through 35 pages.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11705237&postcount=1
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11705802&postcount=219
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11705962&postcount=257
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11706333&postcount=361
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11706671&postcount=436
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11707815&postcount=582
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11707948&postcount=603
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11708020&postcount=615
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11708108&postcount=635
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11708135&postcount=645
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11708146&postcount=647
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11708219&postcount=658
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11708354&postcount=676
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11708476&postcount=683
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11709123&postcount=748
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11709718&postcount=790
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11711808&postcount=959
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11712549&postcount=1076
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11713721&postcount=1246
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11713935&postcount=1293
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11714431&postcount=1401


Farnack said:
Whoa... is this really him?

Did mods confirm it?

If so, mind blown.
Denis has (rarely) posted on GAF and other forums for years. It's definitely him, unless someone from SK broke into his office and hijacked his account.
 

kamorra

Fuck Cancer
barnacles said:
That'd make a good box quote: " Too Human: Not shit. >60% on metacritic. GAF OWNED ".

You've obviously got a heck of a lot of faith in the game to take such a wild outrider of a risk to expect >60%. You've really shown GAF what courage is with your daredevil exploits. It's amazing, profound, and life changing. It's Pwnage with a capital P. I hope you have recorded this pulse pounding episode in your e-resume so down the ages strangers can bask in the fiery, hot, radioactive glow of your untamed heart and experience, vicariously, the impossible thrills of your incredible total victory, snatched, at the last possible second, from the maw of defeat, against all odds. Truly yours is the destiny of the ustoppable conqueror. I hope, as you sweep across the internets, in your ultimate triumph, you take a well deserved moment from your campaign to drive us beneath your feet and hear the lamentation of our women.

:lol :lol :lol
 

Aaron

Member
barnacles said:
You aren't trying the old "5 is the average score" gag are you?
I think his point is a lot of shitty games get released in a year, most of which are never even mentioned on GAF. Any freelance game reviewer is painfully aware of this.

I think 80% should be the target number. After the fallout from GTA4, I don't think any summer games will hit a 90% or higher average.
 
Lostconfused said:
So basically you can quantify the creative process? I think you might be able to make a rather nice bit of money from that.

just saying something is wrong when it takes one company 10+ years to do what everyone else can do in 3-4 max. and that's assuming the game is top notch.
 

FightyF

Banned
barnacles said:
That'd make a good box quote: " Too Human: Not shit. >60% on metacritic. GAF OWNED ".

You've obviously got a heck of a lot of faith in the game to take such a wild outrider of a risk to expect >60%. You've really shown GAF what courage is with your daredevil exploits. It's amazing, profound, and life changing. It's Pwnage with a capital P. I hope you have recorded this pulse pounding episode in your e-resume so down the ages strangers can bask in the fiery, hot, radioactive glow of your untamed heart and experience, vicariously, the impossible thrills of your incredible total victory, snatched, at the last possible second, from the maw of defeat, against all odds. Truly yours is the destiny of the ustoppable conqueror. I hope, as you sweep across the internets, in your ultimate triumph, you take a well deserved moment from your campaign to drive us beneath your feet and hear the lamentation of our women.

:lol

Totally agree with your sarcasm. If it's nothing then why can't the people dissing the game do the same?
 
barnacles said:
That'd make a good box quote: " Too Human: Not shit. >60% on metacritic. GAF OWNED ".

You've obviously got a heck of a lot of faith in the game to take such a wild outrider of a risk to expect >60%. You've really shown GAF what courage is with your daredevil exploits. It's amazing, profound, and life changing. It's Pwnage with a capital P. I hope you have recorded this pulse pounding episode in your e-resume so down the ages strangers can bask in the fiery, hot, radioactive glow of your untamed heart and experience, vicariously, the impossible thrills of your incredible total victory, snatched, at the last possible second, from the maw of defeat, against all odds. Truly yours is the destiny of the ustoppable conqueror. I hope, as you sweep across the internets, in your ultimate triumph, you take a well deserved moment from your campaign to drive us beneath your feet and hear the lamentation of our women.
splendid :lol


Still no rules for this bet hmm.
Personally I expect it to get 82% on average (GR).
 

DCharlie

And even i am moderately surprised
That's a game someone can say that and I'd agree. He needs to define "most", as right now I'm winging it and going to say it's supposed to be better than MGS4 now.

... well, i think i figured out what that PS3 2.36 upgrade added.

i can't believe how chicken shit all the haters are. Talk about gobshite insurance! lol.
 

Aaron

Member
LizardKing said:
was there anything that came of this? changing review scores or reviewers defending their scores or something?
It's just my opinion, but I think for a short while at least reviewers are going to be more conservative with their scores because GTA4 turned out to not be as great as most said it would be.
 

Knox

Member
I firmly believe that Too Human will fall somewhere in between "not shit" and "decent", so I guess I am FOR!!!

Hack and slash dungeon stuff isn't my cup-o-tea, but if a game has that special something that draws me to it I can find myself liking it even if it's not a genre I'm usually a fan of. Too Human has not shown me that spark yet, so until it does I'll continue to not give a shit. I'm only saying for because I think it's got too much hype to get less than 8's from the majority of reviewers. Even if it was complete shit you'd still be looking at metacritic around 70% with the power of MS at your back.
 

Apocryphon

Member
Desperation much?

I for one thought that the initial concept was awesome, but have lost all faith in the game over the past 12 months. The previously planned 4 player co-op would potentially have been it's saving grace, but since it's been scaled back to 2 it's probably become my least anticipated 2008 360 release.

Right now, i'm 110% AGAINST Too Human. It looks lame.
 
If the Against win the game should be patched to include a loading screen that bears the GAF logo nd the legend "Owned by the GAF". This would be a suitable risk.
 
Our preview code should arrive tomorrow. We are allowed to capture a few minutes of video from it so we'll do a video preview with it. I've played it already at a MS event and to be honest is was the opposite of impressed. I'll have a fresh look at it tomorrow.
 

randomwab

Member
Are half of the Against people even going to play it? This whole bet seems pointless if it's simply for tags. I never realised they were Serious Business before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom