Avowed | Review Thread

Down to 80 on metacritic. It'll probably fall in the 70s by the end of it. All the bigger sites gave it poor scores (60-70) and it's the sites nobody has ever heard of that gave it 90-100.
 
Last edited:
Even Reset is acknowledging that overall, this isn't very good.

Gawd, Obsidian, where did you go? Where is the Fallout New Vegas writing? Where is Pillars of Eternity writing? (Oh, that's right, you ran off Chris Avellone).

I know Sawyer is there, but its clear he has not been given free reign over their bigger projects.
 
Last edited:
This is a satire YTouber right?

This came in the side bar while watching the video, lol.





I'm a good Christian boi

8YDwtT8.png



Seriously wtf. This is "the" reviewer peoples waited on? with ~40 subscribers and his KCD 2 criticism?

He's the one?

Cringe GIF
 
After reading more think I'll just stick with kcd2 and playing dice.

I'll wait for monster hunter instead.
 
And that's with the usual Xbox shill sites already posting their biased inflated scores (e.g. Pure Xbox, TrueAchievements, XboxEra, SomosXbox, etc.). I'm actually surprised Windows Central gave it an 80, which is awfully fair of them.

I suspect it will stay around the high 70s on MC, low 80s on OC.
Considering most sites are Sony shills, it would likely be higher but they would never give an Xbox game a high score.
 
That statement means everything and nothing at the same time without knowing the details.

Also coming from the same people who chose to omit space marine 2 from their best looking games of last year showcase.

Meanwhile other outlets have detailed why they deem the game to be technically poor.

But you didn't ask about any of that other stuff you asked how he came to that conclusion so quickly on a video just posted and like I said a quick rundown was right there in the tweet plus its pretty easy just to watch their conclusion

I can't answer that other stuff
 
Considering most sites are Sony shills, it would likely be higher but they would never give an Xbox game a high score.

Those same "Sony shill" sites that gave Microsoft games such high scores that they won Metacritic's "publisher of the year" a few years ago?
 
So i was excited for this game and now my hype has lowered drastically. 1 thing that kills immersion for me in any RPG is having static environments and NPC's, and avowed having that is horrific. When characters don't move then i feel like i'm playing a lifeless videogame and not a living and breathing world that has stories to tell and is alive.
 
Even ignoring their shitty insane views, this game still looks so boring. It seems to have that below Mid feel to it, the same thing that plagued Outer Worlds with this one looking and feeling even worse.
 
I don't know why. I can't quite pinpoint what it is, but the art style in this game seems aggressively generic fantasy to me. Which is wild because the cover art looks awesome, but the actual game doesn't look anything like it.
 
But you didn't ask about any of that other stuff you asked how he came to that conclusion so quickly on a video just posted and like I said a quick rundown was right there in the tweet plus its pretty easy just to watch their conclusion

I can't answer that other stuff

I didn't say he came to a conclusion. It simply made no sense for him to dismiss another person's take on the technical state of the game when he wouldn't have had time to watch the video in full.

I'm watching the video now and even their gushing summary doesn't tell the whole story.
 
I would never know. People cant even agree on whats woke or whats antiwoke. It all puts me to sleep.
Reviewers should never put culture war crap on their reviews. Reviews should be about game itself and nothing else, audience themselves should decide if the game "woke" or not.

These days I can no longer tell whats "woke" and what not and it feels like people use that word simply for things they dont like....that word has no longer has any meaning.
 
Fucking hell, you can't make this shit up...

Now, where are the "both sides are equally bad" people ? I'd like to hear their spin on this.
Yup equivalent to that would be making ad pretending men are better kindergarten teachers/caretakers/nannies from women, every1 know its so unbelivable no cgi/spin will make it even tiny bit real xD
 
Down to 80 on metacritic. It'll probably fall in the 70s by the end of it. All the bigger sites gave it poor scores (60-70) and it's the sites nobody has ever heard of that gave it 90-100.
Did anyone really expect differently?

It's a mediocre looking game, with mediocre performance, mediocre combat, saved by decent graphics and good lighting.
 
Last edited:
I'm a good Christian boi

8YDwtT8.png



Seriously wtf. This is "the" reviewer peoples waited on? with ~40 subscribers and his KCD 2 criticism?

He's the one?

Cringe GIF



Kacho Kacho 's go-to source.

Did anyone really expect differently?

It's a mediocre looking game, with mediocre performance, mediocre combat, saved by decent graphics and good lighting.


Damn man, it's an 80, not an 8, aggregate lol.

Chill, y'all.
 
Last edited:
But you didn't ask about any of that other stuff you asked how he came to that conclusion so quickly on a video just posted and like I said a quick rundown was right there in the tweet plus its pretty easy just to watch their conclusion

I can't answer that other stuff
I guess the game just needs to come out for us to get a real picture. Been the case for a while with bugs/performance issues.
 
Fucking hell, you can't make this shit up...

Now, where are the "both sides are equally bad" people ? I'd like to hear their spin on this.
Yup that shit aired during the Super Bowl. I feel sorry for all the guys who had to pretend it was a great commercial because their wives/girlfriends were around.
 
Damn man, it's an 80, not an 8, aggregate lol.

Chill, y'all.
Given all the FUD lately, I'm going to say it's safe to assume that the scores are inflated. Happened with Indy as well.

Edit:

And no, I'm not saying these games are bad, just mediocre. Typical GP filler.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom