Other than the NES, no console has been lucky enough to have more than one great Mario Bros. game.Magicpaint said:I think its pretty much a given at this point.
Other than the NES, no console has been lucky enough to have more than one great Mario Bros. game.Magicpaint said:I think its pretty much a given at this point.
Trurl said:Other than the NES, no console has been lucky enough to have more than one great Mario Bros. game.
Trurl said:Other than the NES, no console has been lucky enough to have more than one great Mario Bros. game.
I hope New Super Mario Bros. 2 is as hard as Super Mario Bros. 2.Trurl said:I hope EAD plans on releasing another Super Mario Bros. game for the DS.
Ehh. Massive Nintendo successes getting a sequel on the same console is the exception rather than the rule, past 1990.Magicpaint said:I think its pretty much a given at this point.
JonathanEx said:PacSales for UNCONFIRMED sales for... the next thread.
Razoric said:Super Mario World
Yoshi's Island
Magicpaint said:I think its pretty much a given at this point.
Even in Japan the game was called "Super Mario: Yoshi's Island" and it has been included in the Super Mario Advance series. I agree that it doesn't really count as a Mario platformer, yet due to those facts it's still in a way a platformer... that is Mario.Oblivion said:Damn it. How many times must we go through this? Yoshi's Island was called Super Mario World 2 because of NoA's marketing, to give it a bigger push.
So, although a good game, I don't think it should be counted as a Mario platformer.
Yeah, it seems that Zelda is the only exception.JoshuaJSlone said:Ehh. Massive Nintendo successes getting a sequel on the same console is the exception rather than the rule, past 1990.
Trurl said:Yeah, it seems that Zelda is the only exception.
JoshuaJSlone said:Even in Japan the game was called "Super Mario: Yoshi's Island"
Oh, yes.Oblivion said:Was it, really?
I hope they won't call it New Super Mario Bros. 2.jj984jj said:I hope New Super Mario Bros. 2 is as hard as Super Mario Bros. 2.
Scotch said:I hope they won't call it New Super Mario Bros. 2.
"Newer Super Mario Bros" it is then.Scotch said:I hope they won't call it New Super Mario Bros. 2.
Scotch said:I hope they won't call it New Super Mario Bros. 2.
jarrod said:While it had elements from later games in the series, New Super Mario Bros really felt like a design throwback to SMB1 in terms of structure, control and physics... I wouldn't mind if a potential "New Super Mario Bros 2" followed the same pattern, giving us a real followup to Doki Doki/Mario USA.
jarrod said:I wouldn't mind if a potential "New Super Mario Bros 2" followed the same pattern, giving us a real followup to Doki Doki/Mario USA.
Scotch said:I hope they won't call it New Super Mario Bros. 2.
Comments like those have come up before, but I disagree. Noone complained that the second season of Star Trek: The Next Generation was still called Star Trek: The Next Generation, even though it was the same generation as the previous season. If there's a sequel in the next 5 years, I'd bet on it being New Super Mario Bros. 2.yayaba said:That's like calling the second Batman Begins "Batman Begins Again".
It'd be a pretty bankable pattern imo, it'd also help "genre fatigue" from overshadowing the games too... they'd each feel really unique, resonating with their own identities, unlike the annual Sonic/Crash/Spyro/Jak/R&C/Tak/MegaMan/etc installments.Oblivion said:I agree, actually. I would like it if Nintendo sorta retread what they've done with the past 4 Super Mario Platformers. NSMB= SMB, NSMB2 = SM2, etc.
The western release... SMB2 JP is too closely associated with the original. In Japan they could even call it, "New Super Mario Bros USA" instead.Darmstadtium said:I kind of see "New Super Mario Bros. 2" as fitting. The question is though would it be based around the US Mario 2 or the Japanese Mario 2?
And Pokemon.Magicpaint said:And Metroid, we got two of em on both the GC and GBA. I think why I'm sure of a sequel is because this one is doing so incredibly well + competition.
Oh, and Pikmin.Cheebs said:And Pokemon.
It's more like Nintendo hates doing Mario sequels on the same system.
Ehh, Pokémon has mostly had the variants that belong in a set.Cheebs said:And Pokemon.
It's more like Nintendo hates doing Mario sequels on the same system.
So even DSL's huge insanity didn't make Metroid huge eh? (Well it did do 30k last week)jarrod said:Metroid Prime Hunters - 9133
DQ & FF in Itadaki Street - 8574
???
Itadaki P's performace is even worse than Hanjuku DS it looks like. Crisis Core can't come soon enough...
cvxfreak said:With that in mind, I hope Nintendo doesn't milk Diamond and Pearl with a third game.
yayaba said:That's like calling the second Batman Begins "Batman Begins Again".
Yeah, seems inevitable. I'm guessing Opal.Stormbringer said:Oh, they will. Indeed.
Cheebs said:So even DSL's huge insanity didn't make Metroid huge eh? (Well it did do 30k last week)
Yes.Oblivion said:Shouldn't we have gotten sales by now? :/
Those same ninjas that stole the black DSL shipment also stole the sales numbers for this week. We're out of luck.Oblivion said:Shouldn't we have gotten sales by now? :/
Sony is getting desperate.Fuzzy said:Those same ninjas that stole the black DSL shipment also stole the sales numbers for this week. We're out of luck.
I meant Japanese SMB2, shut up jarrod!!!! >_< SMB2 was really challenging throughout, I'd like NSMB2 to be the same.Darmstadtium said:I kind of see "New Super Mario Bros. 2" as fitting. The question is though would it be based around the US Mario 2 or the Japanese Mario 2?
NSMB: 244882 :lolioi said:A 245k week 3 would put NSMB ahead of both Street Fighter II and Pokemon FR / LG (the two closest comparisons):
Jonnyram said:NSMB: 244882 :lol
Numbers are outioi said: