GHG
Gold Member
Microsoft doesn't treat the medium as an art.
They think it's like some piece of software where you can hire a bunch of programmers to build it and then it sustains with much less resources after it's already built.
That's not how gaming works at all. They have never understood this concept. For them to truly thrive they will need processes in place to to take a critical glance at progression milestones, and also employ people on a full time basis with the goal of retaining their institutional knowledge long term, and not throw them away as something disposable. They do not treat their workforce with respect.
This is why I suggested that they should not only have kept Bobby around, but he should have outright replaced Phil.
People can say what they want about him but he understood how to balance the art and business side of making videogames, possibly better than anyone else in the industry. The way Activision were run was the perfect blueprint for how Microsoft wish they could run their videogames business, but it looks like they are going to let it all go to waste.
It actually would have made more sense for Activision to absorb Xbox rather than for Xbox absorb Activision. Xbox should be adopting the practices and processes that Activision had put in place, not the other way round. But the egos at Xbox are too big to let anything like that happen.
Last edited: