The Brooklyn Brawler
Member
I've got funds but I'm at the other side of the world from you and............oh
“The biggest consumer of helium is NASA, using annually almost 75 million cubic feet, followed by the USA Department of Defense, which uses a significant quantity to cool liquid hydrogen and oxygen for rocket fuel”
Ever seen a real satellite in space?
Hydrogen-helium fuel tanks are used for rockets. Large quantities are required.
Yes, the ISS.
thank you for binging that up.
how was it built? The iss ? Any photos?
Videos?
they built it at 17500mph?
Pretty impressive.
Anyway to prove it’s not as fake as it looks?
i asked if there were photos or videos of it being constructed.Yes. It was constructed as a series of interconnected modules by an international effort.
Building the International Space Station (Photos)
See how the International Space Station evolved over 10 years into the largest outpost in space at SPACE.com.www.space.com
Speed is positionally relative, and objects in orbit face no air resistance and minimal chance of collision. Sit in the passenger seat of a car going 100mph on a smooth, straight road and build a Lego set. The speed the car is traveling isn't relevant to your building efforts, yet you'll be building at 100mph.
thank you for binging that up.
how was it built? The iss ? Any photos?
Videos?
they built it at 17500mph?
Pretty impressive.
Anyway to prove it’s not as fake as it looks?
Is that why space walks look like they are filmed in a swimming pool yeah I said itActually, at about <.01 MPH relative speed.
um, dummy, how can mirrors even be real if our eyes aren't real?Do moon landing conspiracy folks get that they can see the mirrors left on the moon or no? I can perfecly well see the entire first site with my amateur telescope even.
You can literarly view the landing spot with a 500-900 home telescope.
Or, do they like glue a picture on them to make you think it's true =o
i asked if there were photos or videos of it being constructed.
I get the relativity, I don’t get how there isnt video of its contstuction.
car on moon live steam 1972
um, dummy, how can mirrors even be real if our eyes aren't real?
edit: i feel bad for saying dummy even though it was obviously for a goof im sorry
cans of whoop ass being handed in this thread, phew
Is that why space walks look like they are filmed in a swimming pool yeah I said it
That guy is a grade A asshole. I think we can all agree on that.I'm surprised to see how personally some people take these things. As if questioning the moon landing is questioning their very existence. I mean that old guy just fucking knocked that nice christian guy the fuck out for it. Who does that old guy think he is?! /s
You guys heard about the plankton on the outside of the iss windows?
That guy is a grade A asshole. I think we can all agree on that.
Dude, you're like a memba berry, lol.
we talking about the same asshole who harassed the astronauts and got punched by aldrin? That guy is an asshole.Nah, the judge took his side. Dude deserved it.
thank you for binging that up.
how was it built? The iss ? Any photos?
Videos?
they built it at 17500mph?
Pretty impressive.
Anyway to prove it’s not as fake as it looks?
well what’s your take on plankton in space?
Space plankton is real.I have no opinion or knowledge of space plankton and would love to learn more, unlike some of the closed minded folks around here...
Do moon landing conspiracy folks get that they can see the mirrors left on the moon or no? I can perfecly well see the entire first site with my amateur telescope even.
Looking in the sky when they tell you to look in the sky isn’t the same as proof of this thing being built in space!
Can you at least admit that there does not exist any possibility of a piece of proof that you'd accept?Looking in the sky when they tell you to look in the sky isn’t the same as proof of this thing being built in space!
The idea that the Sun at the center of our solar system only projects enough light to light up portions of the flat earth while simultaneously illuminating entire halves of other planets its just baffling.
I've seen video where you can't though, so how does one account for that? I can account for perceived curvature due to lenses, that effect is easy to replicate, but I've seen videos from high altitude balloons that do a 360 rotation with a camera, and you see no curve at all. Horizon has risen to eye level, and there does not appear to be a curve.
I'll try and find the video that shows 2 balloon ascent computer models side by side, one based on the purported proportions of the earth and the other based on a flat earth model. The video simulates what a specific type of camera (with no lens distortions) would see on it's ascent to the upper atmosphere. The FE model video clearly matches closer to videos of high altitude balloon ascents than the model which is using the globe earth proportions. Indeed, on that model the curvature is very noticeable as you rise, the horizon is supposed to fall as you rise, and that is very noticeable in the simulation, and does not match video data.
Edit:
Here it is, I can't get timestamp from mobile, but start the video at 14:53 for the simulation
if it's flat as soon as you are higher than the highest mountain you should be able to shine a laser all the way to Australia or something
... and why can you sail in one direction and wind up where you started?
Why is there people in the dark as the same time people are in the daylight?
I don't think this has ever been done either. Has anyone ever circumnavigated the "globe" without turning? I don't believe so. It's just theoretical that if you moved in one direction without ever turning you'd return to the same spot.
Think of the glory. Be the first!Correct, has this experiment been attempted?
Why would turning matter? As long as you are not making the same turn until you go 180 it shouldn't matter,I don't think this has ever been done either. Has anyone ever circumnavigated the "globe" without turning? I don't believe so. It's just theoretical that if you moved in one direction without ever turning you'd return to the same spot.
I thought it was common knowledge by now that the Earth is God's donut, and all the other planets and stars are the universe's big ol' box of donut holes.
FE'ers don't believe the heliocentric model is correct, where did you read that?
Idiot, density would keep the dinosaurs from flying off the earthI am disappoint.
3 pages and this hasn't been posted yet?!?
I've seen this posted on Twitter seriously
Idiot, density would keep the dinosaurs from flying off the earth
If you couldn’t tell I was making fun of FEYou're assuming dinosaurs had the same density as humans!
What if they're actually 4th dimensional beings that have less density than graphene aerogel?!
Their bones could simply be the byproduct of their skeletons returning to 3rd density!
You are clearly ornithoscelidaphobic.
If you couldn’t tell I was making fun of FE
If it was all just a photo op, the Russians wouldn't have conceded to the Americans winning, now would they? They backed up the USA's claim. If they could prove it was fake that would have shamed America into Oblivion. Nah. It was real and people just need to accept that.What an American reason for science to fail.
You have to come at me all rationally like in a thread for conspiracy theories!!
The explorer in me just feels like shifting from the Moon to Mars without ever really understanding the Moon or how to survive on a foreign rock is missing the forest for the trees.
And beating the Russians is exactly the kind of thing we would've setup a photo op for!
No disrespect to the guys who did it though! I don't want to get knocked the fuck out!