• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Moon landing conspiracy and Flat Earth conspiracy theories go here and nowhere else

Status
Not open for further replies.

Weilthain

Banned
It also went offline every 40 mins or so while it was live for reasons. Not 24 hour continuous stream at all but you already knew that
 
Last edited:

Weilthain

Banned
“The biggest consumer of helium is NASA, using annually almost 75 million cubic feet, followed by the USA Department of Defense, which uses a significant quantity to cool liquid hydrogen and oxygen for rocket fuel”
Ever seen a real satellite in space? Wonder why not?
It’s because they are attached to high altitude balloons!

Google are doing this they don’t hide it bit kinda do you knew about that
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
“The biggest consumer of helium is NASA, using annually almost 75 million cubic feet, followed by the USA Department of Defense, which uses a significant quantity to cool liquid hydrogen and oxygen for rocket fuel”

Hydrogen-helium fuel tanks are used for rockets. Large quantities are required.

Ever seen a real satellite in space?

Yes, the ISS.
 

Prison Mike

Banned
g7tMX9T.gif
 

Weilthain

Banned
Hydrogen-helium fuel tanks are used for rockets. Large quantities are required.



Yes, the ISS.

thank you for binging that up.

how was it built? The iss ? Any photos?
Videos?

they built it at 17500mph?
Pretty impressive.
Anyway to prove it’s not as fake as it looks?
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
thank you for binging that up.

how was it built? The iss ? Any photos?
Videos?

Yes. It was constructed as a series of interconnected modules by an international effort.


they built it at 17500mph?
Pretty impressive.
Anyway to prove it’s not as fake as it looks?

Speed is positionally relative, and objects in orbit face no air resistance and minimal chance of collision. Sit in the passenger seat of a car going 100mph on a smooth, straight road and build a Lego set. The speed the car is traveling isn't relevant to your building efforts, yet you'll be building at 100mph.
 

Liljagare

Member
Do moon landing conspiracy folks get that they can see the mirrors left on the moon or no? I can perfecly well see the entire first site with my amateur telescope even.

You can literarly view the landing spot with a 500-900 home telescope.

Or, do they like glue a picture on them to make you think it's true =o
 
Last edited:

Weilthain

Banned
Yes. It was constructed as a series of interconnected modules by an international effort.




Speed is positionally relative, and objects in orbit face no air resistance and minimal chance of collision. Sit in the passenger seat of a car going 100mph on a smooth, straight road and build a Lego set. The speed the car is traveling isn't relevant to your building efforts, yet you'll be building at 100mph.
i asked if there were photos or videos of it being constructed.

I get the relativity, I don’t get how there isnt video of its contstuction.

car on moon live steam 1972
 

Liljagare

Member
thank you for binging that up.

how was it built? The iss ? Any photos?
Videos?

they built it at 17500mph?
Pretty impressive.
Anyway to prove it’s not as fake as it looks?

Actually, at about <.01 MPH relative speed.

And:


Though, I guess we Swedes are in on the conspiracy:

 
Last edited:

Husky

THE Prey 2 fanatic
Do moon landing conspiracy folks get that they can see the mirrors left on the moon or no? I can perfecly well see the entire first site with my amateur telescope even.

You can literarly view the landing spot with a 500-900 home telescope.

Or, do they like glue a picture on them to make you think it's true =o
um, dummy, how can mirrors even be real if our eyes aren't real?

edit: i feel bad for saying dummy even though it was obviously for a goof im sorry
 
Last edited:

Liljagare

Member
i asked if there were photos or videos of it being constructed.

I get the relativity, I don’t get how there isnt video of its contstuction.

car on moon live steam 1972

You are ignoring everything that you can look up by yourself from independant sources.. :\

It's almost like stating the earth is flat.
 
Last edited:

Liljagare

Member
um, dummy, how can mirrors even be real if our eyes aren't real?

edit: i feel bad for saying dummy even though it was obviously for a goof im sorry


................................................................................... someonecall a doc, we got a complete flat line here!!! :p
 

Liljagare

Member
Is that why space walks look like they are filmed in a swimming pool yeah I said it


Please provide a source, and then we will talk about how you will move in a vacuum/0 g..

Not even the best of fighter pilots are able to operate their limbs at a proper normal speed in minus or plus G's, and above all, in 0 G. Your nervous system will take months to adjust moving in different G forces. And if you want to make a fine tune thing, like turning a screw, in a different G enviroment? Yeah, your body took about 4 years to learn how to just walk in normal G, now, you as a adult, think you can relearn putting in screws in 0G?

Good luck.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised to see how personally some people take these things. As if questioning the moon landing is questioning their very existence. I mean that old guy just fucking knocked that nice christian guy the fuck out for it. Who does that old guy think he is?! /s
 

Nymphae

Banned
Do moon landing conspiracy folks get that they can see the mirrors left on the moon or no? I can perfecly well see the entire first site with my amateur telescope even.

I have never seen these alleged photographs for myself, can to link a few that you feel are good?
 

Grinchy

Banned
Looking in the sky when they tell you to look in the sky isn’t the same as proof of this thing being built in space!
Can you at least admit that there does not exist any possibility of a piece of proof that you'd accept?

No matter what anyone can say or show on the internet, you'd need someone to blast you up into space personally on a rocket. And when you came back down to the surface, and told everyone about how you were wrong and the Earth really is round, people like you would call you a plant.
 

kingbean

Member
If it's known that other planets and celestial objects are spherical...
and the proposed way the sun acts like a spotlight or lighthouse to create the appearance of rotation...
How does the sun then light up the rest of the planets in our solar system if it acts like a spot light on earth?


The idea that the Sun at the center of our solar system only projects enough light to light up portions of the flat earth while simultaneously illuminating entire halves of other planets its just baffling.
 
Last edited:

Nymphae

Banned
The idea that the Sun at the center of our solar system only projects enough light to light up portions of the flat earth while simultaneously illuminating entire halves of other planets its just baffling.

FE'ers don't believe the heliocentric model is correct, where did you read that?
 

MetalAlien

Banned
I've seen video where you can't though, so how does one account for that? I can account for perceived curvature due to lenses, that effect is easy to replicate, but I've seen videos from high altitude balloons that do a 360 rotation with a camera, and you see no curve at all. Horizon has risen to eye level, and there does not appear to be a curve.

I'll try and find the video that shows 2 balloon ascent computer models side by side, one based on the purported proportions of the earth and the other based on a flat earth model. The video simulates what a specific type of camera (with no lens distortions) would see on it's ascent to the upper atmosphere. The FE model video clearly matches closer to videos of high altitude balloon ascents than the model which is using the globe earth proportions. Indeed, on that model the curvature is very noticeable as you rise, the horizon is supposed to fall as you rise, and that is very noticeable in the simulation, and does not match video data.

Edit:


Here it is, I can't get timestamp from mobile, but start the video at 14:53 for the simulation

Again though... if it's flat as soon as you are higher than the highest mountain you should be able to shine a laser all the way to Australia or something... and why can you sail in one direction and wind up where you started? Why is there people in the dark as the same time people are in the daylight?

I am deliberately avoiding any proof that needs you to go to space. I'm using examples anyone could replicate.

MetalAlien MetalAlien

sorry bro



Pretty clear you haven’t done much looking into this stuff.


You know Neil hasn't been any higher than an airplane right? Why do you blindly take his word for it but not others?
 

Nymphae

Banned
if it's flat as soon as you are higher than the highest mountain you should be able to shine a laser all the way to Australia or something

Correct, has this experiment been attempted? In fact, this reminds me of one of the points in the Taboo Conspiracy II channel's video "Our Flat Earth Journey", where they talk about this line of sight targeting system called the Knickebein used by German bombers in WW2. Churchill's science adviser didn't believe the system could work due to the earth's curvature and how far the system was supposed to be able to target. It did work, but shouldn't according to the earth's supposed dimensions. The video below starts at the bit about the Knickebein



... and why can you sail in one direction and wind up where you started?

I don't think this has ever been done either. Has anyone ever circumnavigated the "globe" without turning? I don't believe so. It's just theoretical that if you moved in one direction without ever turning you'd return to the same spot.

Why is there people in the dark as the same time people are in the daylight?

 
Last edited:

MetalAlien

Banned
Correct, has this experiment been attempted?
Think of the glory. Be the first!

I don't think this has ever been done either. Has anyone ever circumnavigated the "globe" without turning? I don't believe so. It's just theoretical that if you moved in one direction without ever turning you'd return to the same spot.
Why would turning matter? As long as you are not making the same turn until you go 180 it shouldn't matter,



Two things. Near sunset that creates a dark patch, but in the center of the dark patch there is a reflection. And what about noon? As soon as the light gets anywhere off the edge the effect goes away.

Not to mention what would this look like from the inside? Does it appear light is coming from the whole sky or a point source? How much does the giant glass lens hovering over the earth weight, and if I shoot straight up can I break it?
 

Winter John

Member
This video was on my Youtube list after I watched some dumbass yapping about Nazis in Antartica. I clicked on it to see what it was. Turned out to be some mad woman talking about her husband's adventures with space dinosaurs. I kept watching to see if she was doing some kind of prank shit, but no, she really believes her husband flies space ships and hangs out with space dinosaurs, not just any space dinosaurs though, fuckin royal space dinosaurs.

 
Last edited:

Shifty

Member
I thought it was common knowledge by now that the Earth is God's donut, and all the other planets and stars are the universe's big ol' box of donut holes. 🤔


And the sun is the red-hot mug of coffee that the donut inevitably plunges into in a prospective end-of-the-world scenario, I see, I see 🤔
 
Last edited:
You're assuming dinosaurs had the same density as humans!

What if they're actually 4th dimensional beings that have less density than graphene aerogel?!

Their bones could simply be the byproduct of their skeletons returning to 3rd density!

You are clearly ornithoscelidaphobic.
If you couldn’t tell I was making fun of FE
 

Blade2.0

Member
What an American reason for science to fail. :messenger_tears_of_joy:

You have to come at me all rationally like in a thread for conspiracy theories!!

The explorer in me just feels like shifting from the Moon to Mars without ever really understanding the Moon or how to survive on a foreign rock is missing the forest for the trees.

And beating the Russians is exactly the kind of thing we would've setup a photo op for! :messenger_beaming:

No disrespect to the guys who did it though! I don't want to get knocked the fuck out!
If it was all just a photo op, the Russians wouldn't have conceded to the Americans winning, now would they? They backed up the USA's claim. If they could prove it was fake that would have shamed America into Oblivion. Nah. It was real and people just need to accept that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom