Buggy Loop
Gold Member
Then Nvidia should go back to Samsung as Ampere was expensive but not stupidly expensive.
Even if the node is not as good.. what competition do they even have?
Last edited:
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Then Nvidia should go back to Samsung as Ampere was expensive but not stupidly expensive.
Even if the node is not as good.. what competition do they even have?
Closer
Member
Quality of life > Quality of pixels
Topher
Identifies as young
I'm just giving you shit man
PeteBull
Member
Yup ppl who still got and are fine with 1080p resolution can make massive savings on the gpu purchases, simply coz even if u play same game, exactly same settings/fps but u only need it to be 1080p instead of 4k, thats 4x fewer pixels, which roughly translates to 3x lower performance needed from ur gpu(logically it should be 4x , but in reality its usually around 3x , still plenty coz for example u will be fine with rtx 4060(msrp and actual street price 300usd) and at same settings u will get same(or even bit more)fps vs 2,5k usd rtx 4090 owner who plays at native 4k.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Specs
NVIDIA AD107, 2460 MHz, 3072 Cores, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 8192 MB GDDR6, 2125 MHz, 128 bit
Last edited:
Hawk The Slayer
Member
I'll be aiming for something like a 4060 TI or if Intel makes a 16gb vram version. The 4060 only has 8GB of VRAM which is the same as my current card so it's going to get wrecked even in 1080p with lots of current gen games. Even Ratchet and Clank a early current gen game needs more than 8GB in 1080p to run well. And there's more demanding games than Rift Apart now and a lot of to come from this point onward. It's either the 4060ti, 5060 ti, or Intel if they decide to do a 16gb vram version.Yup ppl who still got and are fine with 1080p resolution can make massive savings on the gpu purchases, simply coz even if u play same game, exactly same settings/fps but u only need it to be 1080p instead of 4k, thats 4x less pixels, which roughly translates to 3x less performance needed from ur gpu(logically it should be 4x less, but in reality its usually around 3x less, still plenty coz for example u will be fine with rtx 4060(msrp and actual street price 300usd) and at same settings u will get same(or even bit more)fps vs 2,5k usd rtx 4090 owner who plays at native 4k.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Specs
NVIDIA AD107, 2460 MHz, 3072 Cores, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 8192 MB GDDR6, 2125 MHz, 128 bitwww.techpowerup.com
12gb of vram should be fine but I want 16gb since I'll mod my games especially for something like Elder Scrolls VI.
Von Hugh
Member
There won't be AMD cards that cost over 1K this time around.
Thebonehead
Gold Member
Sounds a bit INFJ personality to me
Luipadre
Member
And people will be in line for these cards and it will be sold out for weeks. Rage videos will pop up, people will complain, but at the end of the day, they will buy it just like they did it with the 4090
blastprocessor
The Amiga Brotherhood
The more you buy the cheaper it is? 
//DEVIL//
Member
Here is a fun fact. Not even partners know the price of the 5090/5080.
its one of the reason EVGA said fuck it.
The price will be known the date Nvidia announce it. anything else is just a guessing price.
and yes not even partners know the price.
an Australian retailer is the last to know the price of these cards.
its one of the reason EVGA said fuck it.
The price will be known the date Nvidia announce it. anything else is just a guessing price.
and yes not even partners know the price.
an Australian retailer is the last to know the price of these cards.
ResilientBanana
Member
A GPU in a PC will last a decade with other, more powerful components, a PS5 Pro is a small upgrade of a PS5 with an under powered CPU and a shit amount of shared memory.
PeteBull
Member
Yup, if u got 8gigs in ur current gpu, u can simply reduce texture quality a bit(still keep it at high, just not ultra or above ultra, which many games have as an option), but obviously for future if ur target is lowend gpu(so 300$ usd range) u want at least 12gigs, 16gigs being best for futureproofing for solid few years.
We know next xbox wont come earler than holidays 2026, but actual next gen wont start till playstation 6, devs simply wont be stupid enough to leave behind that huge market, so holidays 2028 will be next time to look for whats needed to stay on pair or infront of ps6(we will likely get specs leaks and reveal few months earlier
.Again 2028-2030 will be time of x-gen, where most AAA games will still have last gen versions , so if u gonna get 16gigs 5060ti and still only keep it to 1080p u will be safe( max or close to max settings, maybe with the exception of crazy path tracing which is understandable) till 2030, thats 5 years of peace.
PeteBull
Member
Agree on the ps5pr0.
About pc gpu, it depends on ur target res and willingness to use image reconstruction techniques/reduction in settings, if u are enthusiast, determined to only play at 4k native or at worst 4k dlss quality which isnt that far from 4k native in terms of image quality, then u will be at the bleeding edge of the tech, which actually means, u gonna be bleeding money to keep up
TrebleShot
Member
Don't forget NVIDIA GEFORCE Now is the best streaming solution out there and will get an automatic free upgrade to 5080 tier.
It costs £90 for 3 months so 380 for the year it would take 5 or more to hit the cost of one of these.
You could also get x3 PS5 pros.
It costs £90 for 3 months so 380 for the year it would take 5 or more to hit the cost of one of these.
You could also get x3 PS5 pros.
//DEVIL//
Member
Not if you play it right. I sold my 4090 for higher price MSRP that what I paid for it.Agree on the ps5pr0.
About pc gpu, it depends on ur target res and willingness to use image reconstruction techniques/reduction in settings, if u are enthusiast, determined to only play at 4k native or at worst 4k dlss quality which isnt that far from 4k native in terms of image quality, then u will be at the bleeding edge of the tech, which actually means, u gonna be bleeding money to keep up
a CPU upgrade ( at 4k ) is not needed every 2 years or so. and even a 5800x3d processor that is like 4 or 5 years old by now is way more powerful than PS5 pro cpu ( that thing is a joke why they didn't upgrade it ? )
Really the only very expensive component on a PC is the GPU. rest is manageable.
obviously consoles are just more affordable as front payment compared to PC. but with yearly subs, closed Eco-system where game prices sometimes more than double than the PC price ( especially older games ), you find your self in the long run starting to creep up to PC prices
PS5 was released in 2020. lets say generation end in 2027 for that console ? that is 7 years of ps subs just to have the ability to play online. 80$ per year x 7 = 560$.. isn't this like higher price than the 4070 gpu ? lol.
Last edited:
HerjansEagleFeeder
Member
Maybe board partners can now make a dollar or so profit per card sold. Then again, knowing Nvidia nah lol
The power is and will always be in the consumers hands. This stops when we say it does, until then......
PeteBull
Member
Its not wrong, what u saying, but remember, some of us, pc ppl wanna stay at the bleeding edge, meaning we will be buying those "overpriced" 5090, and not at msrp, but at actual real streetprice, likely close to or at 3k usd/euro.
Those 600$ ppl spending on online sub durning duration of whole console gen is nothing in comparision.
Ofc it also means we arent at console lvl performance, res/settings either, we are far above that, we actually get a taste of what ps6 games will feel like, just 3-4 years earlier.
Here vid from march 2017, of maxed 4k native AC:Unity, not saying its exact quality of current gen games but it definitely is a foretaste, huge upgrade vs what console players got to play back then:
Here quick comparision to last gen console ac unity:
We can see right away that "console peasant" downgrade in every possible metric, lowered settings, 900p resolution, and nasty framerates-30fps at times but with dips to around 20 whenever heaps of npcs are on screen ;/
Last edited:
Bloody Crow of Cainhurst
Member
Jensen better hope a PCMR type person doesn't Luigi him while he's out for his morning run
FingerBang
Member
Then why did Nvidia stop producing them if there is still enough demand to push the price up? To launch their next card at a lower price or to avoid the 4090 competing favorably with the new cards comong out?
Guess we'll find out soon.
JohnnyFootball
GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
Sorry to tell you this, but yeah they fucking can and you assholes will buy it.
<looks at 4090>
oops.
I actually think $1700 is fair for the 5090, but anything over $1000 is outrageous for the 5080
JohnnyFootball
GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
This is bullshit. The 4090 was never priced below its $1599 MSRP. Never. Not once. The cheapest I ever saw one was $1699 at MC. It could be had for under $1800 and could get a good model like the Asus TUF gaming version, which is what I have.
//DEVIL//
Member
you are right. i m one of those people. but to a limit. i am not spending 3k US for example on a video card no matter what.
Schmendrick
Member
Not really hard to understand....
Nvidias GPUs share the same resources at the fabs as their Datacenter products which are incomparably more lucrative. Fading the biggest and ultra niche wafer-space eater out first is just common sense. The times where old lines would just comfortably sit besides the new lines while getting cheaper and cheaper are over
JohnnyFootball
GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
I will say that Intel is putting some pressure on AMD to improve their ray tracing and AI-upscaling. FSR4 absolutely needs to be a home run and this new ray tracing engine that AMD has been talking about also needs to be outstanding. Ray Tracing and XeSS outperform drastically outperform AMD in similar priced products.
Last edited:
HeisenbergFX4
Gold Member
Schmendrick
Member
Can't speak for the US market but it was available in the 1600s (EUR ofc) several times in central Europe and even the 1500s on rare occasions.
Last edited:
The more you buy the more you die
Gaiff
SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
Got mine for $1600. A nice little Zotac. I did see two cheaper models. I think there was another Zotac. Both were going for around $1580. This was right around launch.
Edit: Yep, here it is in CAD. At the time, $1CAD=$0.71 USD, making it $1562 USD before taxes.
I bet I could sell mine for more than the $2120 CAD I paid back then.
Last edited:
Pasta la Vista
Member
And where are the games that this is needed for?
We're long past the days where there is a need to upgrade to the top end because games were evolving so rapidly. Maybe when the Witcher 4 releases in maybe 3 years? GTA VI when that comes to PC eventually. This is just so absurd.
We're long past the days where there is a need to upgrade to the top end because games were evolving so rapidly. Maybe when the Witcher 4 releases in maybe 3 years? GTA VI when that comes to PC eventually. This is just so absurd.
CoreyFlawless
Member
There fans and the media ppl will still eat it all up. If it is true. Imma just stay away from team green.
FingerBang
Member
And that is my other point. Nvidia isn't interested in selling high end graphics cards because they are making bank with their data center products. They don't want their flagship to cannibalize those sales in any way. I also believe that is the reason they are limiting the amount of RAM on their cards.
I am not mad at Nvidia, this is the state of the market and we need to be realistic about it. There is no way this card comes out at a lower price than 2000, knowing chip size and RAM amount. Unless they were willing to take a smaller cut... and why would they?
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
Nailed it!>NVIDIA deliberately spreads rumors of a $2500 5090 they always intended to price at $2000
>Internet gets up in arms
>Jensen reveals it's only $2000 and that it's safe to upgrade
>ZOMG, I told you all, 5090 is much cheaper than we thought! Jensen wins again!
Puscifer
Member
Yep16 GB for almost 2k
Only an idiot would buy/support that shit, but we all know a few around here who will.
Nvidia has fucking lost it
I'm done
PS5 is my last console, 4080 is my last GPU
No way in fucking hell are they going to get my money
Eimran
Member
I find that offensive. I'm an idiot and have no intention of buying it. Good day!16 GB for almost 2k
Only an idiot would buy/support that shit, but we all know a few around here who will.
Schmendrick
Member
I just wanted to point out that the current 4090 prices are in no way indicative to anything else but scarcity due to end of production. For the new products the sky is the limit without any competition.
Last edited:
Puscifer
Member
The fact I make 110K a year and you expect me to think "hmmm 1.5% of my take home income is going to be used towards a single component when this used to buy you the best gaming capable components money could buy for an entire build" is reasonable then you're mistaken. I'm down for staying on the top end but this is ridiculous.You can smell the salt and sweat from low income PS5 Pro owners in this thread.
Bojji
Member
Congrats! Now you can buy 5080 with that money! If 5080 ends up being 1500$, I doubt 5090 will be less than 2500$
Last edited:
Mister Wolf
Member
Still going to get bought up. You get what you pay for.
