FoxMcChief
Gold Member
Starfield is not your average game in terms of scope and content.I was led to believe that the XSX ate monsters for breakfast.
Starfield is not your average game in terms of scope and content.I was led to believe that the XSX ate monsters for breakfast.
He is replying to Dreamcast cunt (aka dreamcsst guy)Who is saying “unfinished?”
Man, do you remember the shit HFW got and 30fps started trending on twitter when the trailer for HFW was released at 30fps?Alternative thread title "PlayStation dev preps fanbase for the inevitable 30fps future coming from 1st party games to the base PS5"
DreamcastRetard, he had to quickly delete his post after getting called out.
I'm glad it took a Bethesda game of all thongs, a studio known for poor optimisation and stupidly linking physics and AI to framerate in their games for people to be more accepting of low framerates and no performance options though.
If only there was a major, massively successful RPG that was locked to 30fps and still sold 10 million units in 3 days, showing people were really accepting of 30fps when it can be justified by scope and hardware constraints.
Can’t quite recall the name of the game. Something like Belda?
Console gamers have been spoiled by games developed with last gen in mind so they could run most of them at 60 fps. More and more games will start to only have 30 fps as developers prioritise visual effects over frame rate and push only the current gen consoles. As always if you want both most of the time you can get it on the PC for a (steep) price.So Zelda is a broken and unfinished game? What on earth has happened to forums when 30 FPS is now seen as an unfinished game?
If only there was a major, massively successful RPG that was locked to 30fps and still sold 10 million units in 3 days, showing people were really accepting of 30fps when it can be justified by scope and hardware constraints.
Can’t quite recall the name of the game. Something like Belda?
why it took days to retract the statement is the question. as spokeperson he should clear of everything from very beginning. days later which mean it might not their inital believe as they changed mind later.Xbox clarified this days later, actually. https://www.tweaktown.com/news/7246...-60fps-mandate-microsoft-clarifies/index.html
Only warriors bringing this shit up.
Only warriors bringing this shit up.
You would like to think so-called console gamers would have the common sense to know some games will run at 30 FPS and some at 60 FPS. I can't think of any console that run every game on it at 60 FPSConsole gamers have been spoiled by games developed with last gen in mind so they could run most of them at 60 fps. More and more games will start to only have 30 fps as developers prioritise visual effects over frame rate and push only the current gen consoles. As always if you want both most of the time you can get it on the PC for a (steep) price.
Man we're lucky they added only 1000 planets because it they decided to do 2000 planets people would be playing at 15 FPS such is the scope.Starfield is not your average game in terms of scope and content.
Man we're lucky they added only 1000 planets because it they decided to do 2000 planets people would be playing at 15 FPS such is the scope.
You know being able to stock sandwiches comes with a price... of exactly 30 FPS.Will people have the choice of a lower resolution for a higher framerate? I always take that option.
was 30fps on gotham knights a choice?
FF16 looks the exact same in both modes. the only difference is the base resolution before the shitty FSR2 upscales the image.
all the settings are the same. both modes look soft and shimmery.
also in 30fps mode you LITERALLY can't see anything as soon as the camera moves. GREAT FIDELITY!
More like oinky.Sounds kinky.
I was envisioning something like that fat vampire thing in bladeMore like oinky.
My boy pearl?I was envisioning something like that fat vampire thing in blade
hahaha that's the one, how the hell did you remember the name. I've seen Blade a fews times now and couldn't come close to remembering the name.P
My boy pearl?
I absolutely loved blade, rewatched like 20 times when i was a kid and pearl was fucking hilarious, i was genuinely sad when he died like a rotisserie chicken...hahaha that's the one, how the hell did you remember the name. I've seen Blade a fews times now and couldn't come close to remembering the name.
whistlers entrance there is one of my all time faves, "Catch you fuckers at a bad time". It's up there with Sam Elliot in ghostrider "i've got one last ride in me"I absolutely loved blade, rewatched like 20 times when i was a kid and pearl was fucking hilarious, i was genuinely sad when he died like a rotisserie chicken...
Embarrassing journalism standards.And of course, your (sic) right to dislike the choice.”
It is 100% hardware limitation, since with much better(and more expensive) pc rig u will be able to play it in 60fps no probs( maybe more but its bethesda so who knows, gotta assume at first 60 will be close to limit).phil spencer says it is not a hardware limitation
I'm sure Bethesda and Xbox are aware of this.McDonalds has a track record of producing cheap burgers with questionable ingredients.
Bethesda has a track record of buggy launches.
People continue to buy McDonalds because they like the taste.
I'm not so sure Bethesda can afford another disaster launch. They better be careful.
It does, at 30 frames per second speed ;D (joking aside cant expect open world next gen only game to run stable 60fps on 500$ mashine, we got high end pc rigs for that, that cost 1k usd+), like this rig, i can guarantee 1440p high in 60fps stable there, but price tag 1112usd https://pcpartpicker.com/list/XYTKyK which means u gotta pay over 2,2x higher price for 60fps and u still wont get 4k, but rather 1440p, in terms of pixels 1440p is 78% more vs full hd, 4k is 4x more.I was led to believe that the XSX ate monsters for breakfast.
They did some early testing with lowering it to 480p and 60fps for the frame snobs. Here is some early footage they had before they scrapped it.Ok. So it could hit 60 fps by lowering the settings?
If a game doesn't have a n option for 60 fps, then it's a poor game. Welcome to 2023, the future is now.
I'm not so sure Bethesda can afford another disaster launch. They better be careful.
Forum goers are even worse though. They seem to know more than the devs. Oh, and it was a YouTuber that said it was a sign of being unfinished.Who the hell said that it was unfinished? I swear some of these devs are masters of gaslighting and strawmanning.
On the recommended settings it lists 3600X CPU (never mind the 2600X for the minimum). So either the game is CPU bound which means that it has shit code that cannot leverage the 4 extra threads the Series X has over PC or it is GPU bound which means halving the graphical strain doubles the performance. Unless Bethesda come out and say the exact reason and which part of the system is the bottleneck and why, people should assume it's technical incompetence.They did some early testing with lowering it to 480p and 60fps for the frame snobs. Here is some early footage they had before they scrapped it.
Twitter goers are worse. It was where the dev responded to.Forum goers are even worse though. They seem to know more than the devs.
Not for me. I always choose graphics over performance when playing my Xbox and PS games.Native 4K is such a waste of resources.
Hey 0 fps is the maximum fidelity possible... cant get more "creative" them that !! So win for the playstation fan everywhere!!!Reality is it is running at 0fps across all Playstation models
Not for me. I always choose graphics over performance when playing my Xbox and PS games.