I laughed because I always laugh at anyone that says devs are lazy.
OK, if it makes you feel better...
It’s a perfectly apt response to ‘lazy devs’ rhetoric.
Nobody said having options are a bad thing. Pitching it as ‘laziness’ is silly.
Not surprised you endorsed that post though.
The irony of you not recognizing that emoji responses are also an opinion too
Aw hell nah! You might be onto something, thoughAlternative thread title "PlayStation dev preps fanbase for the inevitable 30fps future coming from 1st party games to the base PS5"
No, the problem is with these rabid fanboy jackasses.
Not being released yet is a sign it is unfinished.
Maybe people would believe that excuse if anything about Starfield looked impressive.
Not at 4K it can't. The XSX and the PS5 do not have anything near the equivalent of a 3070 or a 4070.Old PCs will run the game just fine and most at 60 FPS.
XSX? Nah breh shit can't do 60 FPS even if runs circles around old PCs.
Get out of here, I have never heard of a situation where targeting 60fps ever sacrificed this mysterious god-"gameplay". How ironic this SSM Graphic dev quoting DF for predicting 30fps when he clearly worked on a game that has performance AND HFR mode.
Look at the list of this sub-par 60fps and some *gasp* 120fps that selfishly sacrificed, the gameplay:
No one is asking for 4K60.
Depends. Bethesda made the choice to not include a performance mode. You get to make the choice to play the game or not. So you still get to choose whether you play at 30 fps.
Spencer fucked up. He is paid enough to take his job seriously and prepare. How he didn't realise the question would be asked is impressive (not in a good way), and his half arsed response showed lack of preparation. He could have said 30 at launch and look into 60fps versions that do not detract from the studio's vision. Instead he implied the consoles could do it, but the studio decided against it.
Yeah, but with an emphasis on Shooting, so 60fps would be nice.
"We obviously have games that are running at 4K/60 on the platform. It’s not a platform issue, it’s a creative decision."
Yeah, I understand. Not being at 60fps isn’t going to deter me from playing the game. Just thought that quote from Microsoft was cringe af.
I assume they didn't want it to look like shit.
Your like an onion……so many layers to your complex…
It's a Bethesda game... on the PC... I would be shocked if it wasn't, and it's irrelevant to this topic.
This. Thank you for having common sense.
He's used to curveballs like select politicians and celebrities get.
I'm aware, but that was the benchmark they're aiming for. So 30FPS it is. They chose fidelity over framerate. Odd thing is, people have been asking for better looking games. So technically everyone asked for 4K30.
You realize that almost every game there is either last-gen (surprise, surprise last-gen games can hit 60 on current-gen hardware), severely compromised in 60fps mode, or Esports titles.
I've never seen a group of "gamers" that fight for complete development stagnation as much as some of you guys. Enjoy your last-gen games, that's as good as it ever gets for you apparently.
Time and budget will limit most games to thresholds that will certainly keep 60fps on the table, but to raise pitchforks against games that are trying to increase the scope and scale beyond that is absurd. If at some point they get it optimized to hit 60 without cutting anything, yeah! Progress in the medium itself trumps both visuals and framerates for me personally.
Also Flight Sim is 30. These are acceptable compromises for games that push the envelope.
