clarky
Gold Member
Not if you can't play it while on the shitter.The cheaper current gen console wins easily.
Not if you can't play it while on the shitter.The cheaper current gen console wins easily.
Ps5 is clearly better overall but the hair does look better on switch 2 I'll give it that.
Mouse controls, even with visual downgrades it would instantly be the best console version. I played the Xbox version for 45 minutes and then never touched it again, just awful to play,Imagine if Larian announced Baldur's Gate 3 on Switch 2 after all the trouble they had on Series S
It is
Yup. Love to see it. And we all know the hate-bandwagon people are going to buy the console anyway. In the end, Nintendo don’t do any ports, so people are wasting negative energy for no reason. I mean is the plan to skip playing their games? Have fun with that lolThe fact that we're literally spitting hairs when comparing the Switch 2 and PS5 versions says a lot about just how wildly the SW2 is beating expectations here. Borderline unbelievable.
That's not the same picture at all, since the PS5 has depth of field and the Switch 2 doesn't. If somebody can't see that, then it's probably time for a visit to their ophthalmologist.NeoGAF.
Most people:
![]()
99% of far away shots the ps5 has a clear edge with added sharpness and visual effects, but then you have these close up shots… weird? Weird
![]()
Still waiting on the toolsThis makes me wonder if the Series S port of this game just fucking sucks. It seems unusually blurry and low resolution to me.
Agreed.Actually looks better than I was expecting
No need to ask, the XSS port of SF6 was miserable. Even more miserable when you see how ports of the most powerful and demanding fighting games like TEKKEN 8 and MK1 (also with UE5) were exceptional in XSS.This makes me wonder if the Series S port of this game just fucking sucks. It seems unusually blurry and low resolution to me.
Texture seem to be noticeably better on the right, but I do not think I will take this source (El Analista del bits) with less than a truckload of salt in favour of one or the other console.99% of far away shots the ps5 has a clear edge with added sharpness and visual effects, but then you have these close up shots… weird? Weird
![]()
We will see how the comparisons will shake up once done properly, but a portable console docked reaching even in the same neighbourhood of a console not designed to be portable at all and consuming much more power is an achievement regardless of how close it matches it. No need for people to make shit up for console warring purposes. It is a bit hilarious seeing the more hardcore N fans going from “graphics and cost do not matter, fun does, we do not play specs” to “OMG graphics Rox yes yes” when they think it is better than Series S, etc… very adaptableI suppose the official line on here going forward is that any multi-platform game on the S2 that stands up to the almighty Playstation versions was shit in the first place![]()
There is a reason why Sony decided to invest their money to do HW customisations and push AMD into what became PSSR and FSR4, they do know it is a must must must must have for them to close the gap with DLSS or shorten it at least.Well, they upped the power above 40w as I just realized today... But yeah, feels like between current and last gen settings with DLSS lifting the IQ above current gen consoles... Not sure and I need confirm but would be hilarious to see that being the case
Yups docked, ofc in handheld it will be around 10W.Switch 2 draws 40 watts? That can't be right! Is this in docked mode only?
That Series S comparison
![]()
Buckle up folks. Gonna be a fucking wild ride. The little console that could.
Just looks like a sharper image due to DLSS whats all the fuzz about in this thread ?
Poor kid thought that was an advantage for Switch.Just looks like PS5 has DOF applied?
Just looks like a sharper image due to DLSS whats all the fuzz about in this thread ?
You buy a Portal. PS5 + Portal is still cheaperNot if you can't play it while on the shitter.
You buy a Portal. PS5 + Portal is still cheaper
Ah, but you need an Internet connection to use the Portal.
You don't need any Internet connection to use the Switch 2, meaning you can play it anywhere you like.
SF6 is irrelevant with no internet connection, might as well not bother.
SF6 is also irrelevant without the lowest possible latency, so you might as well not bother with the Portal either.
Still more playable than a Switch on the road.
SF6 is irrelevant with no internet connection, might as well not bother.
Still more playable than a Switch on the road.
Yes! I was absolutely skeptical, but having watched these footages GTA 6 doesn't look impossible on Switch 2 now.Like I said, switch 2 is better than series S. It is a must buy for me.
If this beast get gta 6 it is over.
Not at all. I love playing single player. Thats why systems like the Switch beat the portal for portability. I can take the Switch 2 and play anywhere. Can't do that with the portal.
Are you sure about that?
All the flavours in the world and you choose pure salt. Stop caping for your console war overlord.Yeah, single player SF6 on the SW2 may be a better use for it. I mean who are you going to play versus with, 8 year olds? lmao
Can PS4 Pro run Yakuza Zero at 4k@60?Switch 2 should certainly be inferior to the PS4 Pro even when docked
"60 fps modes" fluctuating around 30-40 fps!Elden Ring and Cyberpunk have 60fps modes on Series S
You're off to a great start.Yeah, single player SF6 on the SW2 may be a better use for it. I mean who are you going to play versus with, 8 year olds? lmao
Yeah, single player SF6 on the SW2 may be a better use for it. I mean who are you going to play versus with, 8 year olds? lmao