Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
www.bloomberg.com
An impressive milestone.
All that needs to be said - vinyls are great if you are going for a physical factor of your music collection.Vinyls at least have the collecting factor, because of their size they are great for displaying the Cover Art, and many release special editions with colored Vinyls and stuff like that.
Yes, and thru a 40 year-old Technics table that works like a tank.For people who buy vinyl, do you actually listen to it? You bought a modern record player (no way anyone is going to dust off a 40 year old machine) and play the disc?
Or do you buy them more for collectability and it looks great on a shelf and you either never play them or play it once and then display it?
I have a shitty player so I tend to not listen to them, but the plan is to eventually get a better player and use it more often. For now it's just a collection that every once in awhile will get used for the novelty.For people who buy vinyl, do you actually listen to it? You bought a modern record player (no way anyone is going to dust off a 40 year old machine) and play the disc?
Or do you buy them more for collectability and it looks great on a shelf and you either never play them or play it once and then display it?
Never cared for vynil. It was kind of fun to get high and go through records and hear how shitty they did or didn’t sound but I never got into it like some people do.
and no they don’t have better sound quality. They just have a “nice” sound. It’s warm and has charm l, but it’s not better audio quality than CDs or streaming. People who claim that are dumb.
The plural of vinyl is vinyl, not vinyls.![]()
CDs are pretty useless. you can get the same quality digitally now.
Vinyls at least have the collecting factor, because of their size they are great for displaying the Cover Art, and many release special editions with colored Vinyls and stuff like that. while CDs are rarely as nicely made. some DigiPacks are still kinda cool, but even those are usually not as cool as Vinyls
the only CD albums I would still buy are ones like these ones, which are really nicely made:
![]()
![]()
these in particular also are about the size of a Vinyl cover, so the art is nicely displayed
Idk I have quite a few discs that have such a wide stereo separation and clarity that listening to the digital versions after leave something to be desired.Never cared for vynil. It was kind of fun to get high and go through records and hear how shitty they did or didn’t sound but I never got into it like some people do.
and no they don’t have better sound quality. They just have a “nice” sound. It’s warm and has charm l, but it’s not better audio quality than CDs or streaming. People who claim that are dumb.
Lol. Bullshit. You obviously have no idea how mastering works.
Porn on VHS will always be better though. Low-res made more of a fantasy.I can't wait for VHS to overtake Blu-Ray.
Idk I have quite a few discs that have such a wide stereo separation and clarity that listening to the digital versions after leave something to be desired.
Though it helps if the discs are clean. Of course a marked-up scratched record from the dollar bin's gonna sound like shit.
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
www.bloomberg.com
An impressive milestone.
There is a difference between being an audiophile and what you describe. You are literally scraping the bottom of the barrel with that setup, no matter if the vinyl is good or not it will sound like poo compared to streaming.i have some vinyls and enjoy the higher sound quality but it's too expensive to keep going. i have a cheap player (~£120) and cheap speakers (~£50). honestly i don't want to spend money on better hardware and it's about £20-30 per record. i like music but i guess i ain't an audiophile. i'm quite happy with listening to music through Apple Music/Spotify on my basic PC speakers and my XM3 earphones.
To be fair who the hell is buying cd's?
It depends, there are those that like CD as a half way between vinyl and streaming. There is less fuss with regards to CDs then with vinyls, at the same time with good setup CD can sound incredible which you cannot have streaming over BT with that free tier lossy MP3 format.To be fair who the hell is buying cd's?
I am aware that Vinyl, on a good setup, sounds better (In some cases) than CD.
It really does not, it’s a preference, not a fact. What CD has is a sound wall above 20hz, which vinyl does not - there is an ongoing discussion whether humans are actually able to hear or respond to higher frequency sounds.
As for the analog vs. digital you first need to make sure the music was recorded and mastered in an analog way, which is rarely the case. That master that gets pressed for vinyl? Digital most of the time.
He looks like someone that will hook his turntable to speakers without a pre-amp and wonder why he can’t hear anything.Are you telling me Nicolas Cage was wrong?
![]()
He looks like someone that will hook his turntable to speakers without a pre-amp and wonder why he can’t hear anything.
Vinyl tends to get its own mastering and has largely escaped the loudness wars.It really does not, it’s a preference, not a fact. What CD has is a sound wall above 20hz, which vinyl does not - there is an ongoing discussion whether humans are actually able to hear or respond to higher frequency sounds.
As for the analog vs. digital you first need to make sure the music was recorded and mastered in an analog way, which is rarely the case. That master that gets pressed for vinyl? Digital most of the time.
It really does not, it’s a preference, not a fact. What CD has is a sound wall above 20hz, which vinyl does not - there is an ongoing discussion whether humans are actually able to hear or respond to higher frequency sounds.
As for the analog vs. digital you first need to make sure the music was recorded and mastered in an analog way, which is rarely the case. That master that gets pressed for vinyl? Digital most of the time.
wondering if there’s a list of the records that actually are recorded, mastered, and pressed in analog?