TheGodfather07
Member
I'm pretty sure AI could have generated better dialogue than Bethesda did for starfield.
If u are in game development, u probably better off starting to learn some other profession sooner rather then later. AI will wreck that industry.
If the only jobs left over are trade jobs, I'd be all for elective lobotomies for those unable to take the drudgery.They probably use Bing ai or chat gpt already to write these woke scripts. So it’s just about cutting out the middle man/woman/other, which is just a part of natural evolution.
I have my own IT consultancy company but we have to change to these new developments also, and probably within a decade or something our traditional work is not necessary anymore but that’s life.
So instead of complaining the script writers here should evolve with the times and try to learn to do something else that is or will become relevant to society.
just because we can do something. doesn't mean we should.AI is inevitable, whether people want it or not.
It depends. Before the invention of machines, you had multiple people pull the blocks in order to lift buildings...But those jobs disappeared.Physical labor is mostly safe from automation on foreseeable future. Things like plumbing, construction etc.
Like taking a dump after drinking your morning coffee? This will be like social media. But of course we'll need a few decades to see the results.AI is inevitable, whether people want it or not.
Sadly this is true. But I’m not sure how much of that is the companies direction for PC or their actual ideas. If you only have shit characters to work with and they also are not allowed to do or say something that might offend someone, it will be bad when AI does it too.Well its going to be really fucking easy to any AI to write better than this fucking milleniuns and gen z writers.. thats for sure .. they all sound like fucking npcs anyway.
Starfield.not like their games didn't already feel AI generated
This.Physical labor is mostly safe from automation on foreseeable future. Things like plumbing, construction etc.
The issue with AI is that at the end of the day the execs make the decisions, and to a soulless CEO, the possibility of using AI to replace writers, voice actors and coders is a lot more interesting and money saving, than using it to create more fleshed out and realistic characters in an RPG.There's massive potential in gaming and interactive media to use AI to make character interactions genuinely responsive and dynamic in ways that scripted games simply can't be. The dream of being able to talk to any character about anything.
That tech isn't there yet. And might be a ways off before the tools are there for it to really work in a way that feels authored. But the design implications are too large and it's an inevitable sea change, as transformative as going from pre-rendered 3D to realtime.
If AI truly becomes AI in the sense of the word, beyond the buzzword it kinda still is, and with the advancements in robotics, no job is truly safe forever. Anyone working on computers right now is prime candidate for extinction but also physical human labor might only survive because a human life might be much cheaper than a high tech robot that kinda inevitably will be able to do the very same stuff. Kinda like third world people working today in terrible conditions and doing stuff that would be done in the west by a machine but is there still cheaper done by those slaves.I bet quite a few of you who don’t seem to care are probably in jobs that AI can do too… This doesn’t stop at the door of Hollywood.
You're making it sound like writers can just write whatever they want. In the end all that stuff gets run by the higher-ups and if they're not cool with it you won't see it in the final game.Except when generating something people ask the prompt. No need to hire a person anymore whose contribution would be writing a story about Gen Z in debt fighting mexican crime syndicates and telling bad jokes
I have to laugh at all the people who don't care a jot that people will be put out of work - as if AI won't affect their jobs at all ever.
I got in a conversation a few weeks ago with someone who couldn't see what the problem was with AI taking over in the entertainment industry. His job? Cost engineer for a construction firm
Mate… you push numbers about on a computer screen. You’re a prime candidate to get made obsolete by AI.
I bet quite a few of you who don’t seem to care are probably in jobs that AI can do too… This doesn’t stop at the door of Hollywood.
It doesn't really change what he's saying. If they're going to make some generic crap anyway they might as well use AI.You're making it sound like writers can just write whatever they want. In the end all that stuff gets run by the higher-ups and if they're not cool with it you won't see it in the final game.
All that shit is in there because studio and publisher executives want it to be there, and replacing the writers won't do shit to change that. AI isn't inherently un-woke. If someone wants an AI to come up with woke stories, it'll gladly deliver.
this comes off a lot like ten years ago when people were saying the exact same thing in defense of Microsoft’s always-online vision for the Xbox OneDo people really think that Microsoft is the only one that's going to be utilizing AI in some shape or form for game development? If you think Nintendo or Sony won't be utilizing it then think again. This is the state of the industry and where it's heading whether you like it or not.
I highly doubt the writing and script that take 5 years to make.....Wonder if the dev cycles will still be 5 years.
You're making it sound like writers can just write whatever they want. In the end all that stuff gets run by the higher-ups and if they're not cool with it you won't see it in the final game.
All that shit is in there because studio and publisher executives want it to be there, and replacing the writers won't do shit to change that. AI isn't inherently un-woke. If someone wants an AI to come up with woke stories, it'll gladly deliver.
No one should be forced to use/or not to us AI in their games, then market will decide, fuck regulations you commies.
I think AI could definitely make a better president for the US. Even the dumbest AI would be an improvement over sleepy JoeIt depends. Before the invention of machines, you had multiple people pull the blocks in order to lift buildings...But those jobs disappeared.
You're not serious? You have to be trolling, right? Even Sony and Nintendo will be on the A.I. bandwagon.MS is always the disruptor of videogame technology. Always pushing the medium forward.(said no one ever)
this A.I. push is the same as the Cloud push (Crackdown 3): Is coming from MS and not Xbox itself. So you know.
This is false. Game development and film are very similar - close cousins, I think is the saying...When are people going to learn that movie productions and game development aren't the same.
AI will most likely be a net positive for game development, if used correctly. It can allow for more (and better) writing, dynamic storyline, quicker turnaround with world development, better enemy/friendly ai and so on and so forth.
Not everything goes straight to replacing voice actors.
You're not serious? You have to be trolling, right? Even Sony and Nintendo will be on the A.I. bandwagon.
This is the end result of shitty woke DEI policies driving hiring practices, forcing companies to hire on the basis of irrelevant horseshit instead of actual competency.
Procedural things never really worked without the human creative sauce. Why would I want to spend even more time in a game? Baldur's Gate 3 was 250 hours long and they only had 50 hour or so content that was really polished and enjoyable. Fuck it, I would've been delighted if it was only that long. AAA games are already too long. And if half the user base gets to the end, then that's already a miracle. Now why the holy friggin fuck do you want more fake interaction enabled by an AI assistant planted into NPCs? You have to draw the line somewhere, things must have an end. The less people spend their precious time in a WoW like neverending story, the better. I vote for more quality experience, 20-40 hour max gameplay, with rollercoaster like up n downs, than a flat, boring, repetitive slugfest stretched over 100+ hours.I might be in the minority, but I always thought games like Skyrim and Oblivion felt dead after you’d exhausted certain quested (specifically side quests) from NPCs….
I think it’s awesome to be able to keep the narratives going like “the thieves guild” after the initial quests that are offered are complete. Just look at Starfield, once your done with the Crimsonfleet story line the reasons for going back there are minimal.
Yet imagine if NOTHING about the game changed, including the actors who got paid for their voice work, and yet AI was implemented for late game content to continue the story. It’s a win/win.
I believe where the issues arises is when AI is implemented from the start as a means to bypass talent and or used to drive the story all together.