Professor Beef
Banned
lmao fuck i came here to post the same shit
I doubt it, French grammar is rather complicated. English is honestly one of the easiest languages to learn.It's probably easier to learn than English.
It's probably easier to learn than English.
How the fuck did Le Pen get over 30% of the votes when this guy was an option...?
How the fuck did Le Pen get over 30% of the votes when this guy was an option...?
I am liking this guy more and more.
Translation:
Emmanuel Macron also invited American scientists and entrepreneurs to come work in France. "To all the scientists, entrepreneurs, engaged citicizens that were disappointed by the US president's decision," he assured them that they would "in France, find a second nation." "I am calling you: come work here, with us, on concrete solutions about climate," he added. "Tonight, America has turned its back on America, but France will never turn its back on Americans," Emmanuel Macron added.
Daaaaamn
Almost every single developed signatory put out a similar press statement - even Theresa May (after much prompting and ridicule) and the UK is the US' lapdog. Why is doing something nearly every other developed country has also done super-amazing when it comes to Macron specifically? Why is there no equivalent thread for Merkel's statement or Gentiloni's?
To be fair, you guys had Obama.Why can't America have Democratic politicians with this level of ballsiness? I'm jealous. =/
Source for this picture? 0_oI think it's because Macron is what was standing between Europe and a disaster
So, his voice in this moment is something people want to hear as it's exactly what people were hoping for with his election.
Source for this picture? 0_o
I think it's because Macron is what was standing between Europe and a disaster
So, his voice in this moment is something people want to hear as it's exactly what people were hoping for with his election.
Why can't America have Democratic politicians with this level of ballsiness? I'm jealous. =/
He's actually a doer, the total opposite of what you describe. He's the most pragmatic politician and if you pay attention from now on, or watch documentaries about him, you'll now it soon enough.He took less than Chirac did in his second round. I'm not sure this is 'exactly' what people were hoping to hear.
Macron's PR game is good, but so far he's just another Trudeau - all talk and bluster, no delivery. I find this fetishising of him bizarre.
I don't believe the Paris Accords actually do anything to "save the planet" - more specifically, keep the environment habitable for human beings as they are now, the planet will be just fine with or without humans. They are just an empty feels good gesture that makes everyone feel smug about how we all came together to do good, without actually implementing a single thing that is demonstrably going to have any significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions or temperature change. The only two actionable items in the Paris accords are creating a 100 billion fund and requiring every country to report its greenhouse gas emissions, nothing about what happens if you go over your "allocation". Out of the 195 countries that signed up, 180 will receive money from the fund and only 15 will be paying into the fund so not really much of a surprise that everyone is for it.
That said, if the Paris Accords really were meant to reverse climate change, why would they not be open to negotiation? That tactic only is used when you want to win your side of an argument. If it truly was the only way to save humanity from extinction, its a weird attitude to take -- "NO NEGOTIATIONS!".
Almost every single developed signatory put out a similar press statement - even Theresa May (after much prompting and ridicule) and the UK is the US' lapdog. Why is doing something nearly every other developed country has also done super-amazing when it comes to Macron specifically? Why is there no equivalent thread for Merkel's statement or Gentiloni's?
I don't believe the Paris Accords actually do anything to "save the planet" - more specifically, keep the environment habitable for human beings as they are now, the planet will be just fine with or without humans. They are just an empty feels good gesture that makes everyone feel smug about how we all came together to do good, without actually implementing a single thing that is demonstrably going to have any significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions or temperature change. The only two actionable items in the Paris accords are creating a 100 billion fund and requiring every country to report its greenhouse gas emissions, nothing about what happens if you go over your "allocation". Out of the 195 countries that signed up, 180 will receive money from the fund and only 15 will be paying into the fund so not really much of a surprise that everyone is for it.
That said, if the Paris Accords really were meant to reverse climate change, why would they not be open to negotiation? That tactic only is used when you want to win your side of an argument. If it truly was the only way to save humanity from extinction, its a weird attitude to take -- "NO NEGOTIATIONS!".
Nothing indeed. Compare the US contribution to what Trump saves for he and his friends with such a measure, out of plenty others: https://twitter.com/brutofficiel/status/869208424227143680And a 100 billion is NOTHING compared to the complete world wealth. For example, the Iraq war cost 20 times that number.
Native English speakers in America are frequently told by non-natives that our language has too many cryptic exceptions and that many other languages are easier with more consistent rules. You've never encountered this belief before?
Only republicans have succeeded in making global warming this partisan. Countries with functional government rarely shun science as liberal propoganda
Almost every single developed signatory put out a similar press statement - even Theresa May (after much prompting and ridicule) and the UK is the US' lapdog. Why is doing something nearly every other developed country has also done super-amazing when it comes to Macron specifically? Why is there no equivalent thread for Merkel's statement or Gentiloni's?
Bruh, that sounds so nice right now.Dear Americans,
The netherlands has a very real shortage of IT people. Move here and be one of us. you'll get 30% tax free income if you score your job while still living abroad. Shit my company desperately needs people, if you're willing to move and are not garbage in IT, there's your easy ticket.
All that 'but I don't speak the language' stress of France and Germany doesn't really apply here, at least for the first few years.
I have no idea what his presidency is going to ultimately lead to, but this guy really has balls of steel. I mean, first he out alphas Trump on his trip, then he makes a video telling the US directly that he wants their best in France, and now he's just like, fuck that, we aren't making no deals. I'm just waiting for him to just flat out say, 'Fuck Donald Trump' and drop the mic.
I think it's because Macron is what was standing between Europe and a disaster
So, his voice in this moment is something people want to hear as it's exactly what people were hoping for with his election.
I don't believe the Paris Accords actually do anything to "save the planet" - more specifically, keep the environment habitable for human beings as they are now, the planet will be just fine with or without humans. They are just an empty feels good gesture that makes everyone feel smug about how we all came together to do good, without actually implementing a single thing that is demonstrably going to have any significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions or temperature change. The only two actionable items in the Paris accords are creating a 100 billion fund and requiring every country to report its greenhouse gas emissions, nothing about what happens if you go over your "allocation". Out of the 195 countries that signed up, 180 will receive money from the fund and only 15 will be paying into the fund so not really much of a surprise that everyone is for it.
That said, if the Paris Accords really were meant to reverse climate change, why would they not be open to negotiation? That tactic only is used when you want to win your side of an argument. If it truly was the only way to save humanity from extinction, its a weird attitude to take -- "NO NEGOTIATIONS!".
Haha, thanks for the replies guys. I wasn't expecting that big a response
To be exact, Chinese is my mother tongue but I'm mainly speaking in English. So I'll be basing the difficulty of learning new language with it. Currently studying Aerospace, haven't decided where to go afterwards other than "not US or U.K. If possible"
There's something slightly off about the Trump picture. Can't put my finger on it...
It is missing 100 pounds.
and about 30 years
He took less than Chirac did in his second round. I'm not sure this is 'exactly' what people were hoping to hear.
Macron's PR game is good, but so far he's just another Trudeau - all talk and bluster, no delivery. I find this fetishising of him bizarre.
I don't believe the Paris Accords actually do anything to "save the planet" - more specifically, keep the environment habitable for human beings as they are now, the planet will be just fine with or without humans. They are just an empty feels good gesture that makes everyone feel smug about how we all came together to do good, without actually implementing a single thing that is demonstrably going to have any significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions or temperature change. The only two actionable items in the Paris accords are creating a 100 billion fund and requiring every country to report its greenhouse gas emissions, nothing about what happens if you go over your "allocation". Out of the 195 countries that signed up, 180 will receive money from the fund and only 15 will be paying into the fund so not really much of a surprise that everyone is for it.
That said, if the Paris Accords really were meant to reverse climate change, why would they not be open to negotiation? That tactic only is used when you want to win your side of an argument. If it truly was the only way to save humanity from extinction, its a weird attitude to take -- "NO NEGOTIATIONS!".
On top of generally liking the guy, his optimistic outlook and the way he discourses, this was (and still is) my biggest expectation when voting for him: that he saw all this worldwide political turmoil as an opportunity for positive change for France and the EU in general. Again, we'll see how his policies go, but his international PR game is on point.Merkel and Gentiloni didn't broadcast their statements on video in English from the Élysée. Nor did they make statements directly inviting U.S. climate scientists and researches to make Germany or Italy their second home, as far as I'm aware. Macron is the new guy in town and he's making a very good show of the unabashed flair he's brought to the French presidency.
Pretty much. But you know, like Trump and LePen, this "scum" is a symptom, not the disease itself.How the fuck did Trump get over 40% of the votes when he was who he is?
Hateful, stupid fucking scum. With a right to vote.
Pretty much. But you know, like Trump and LePen, this "scum" is a symptom, not the disease itself.
It's rather hard to define the disease in this case. Capitalism? Globalization?
I am liking this guy more and more.
Translation:
Emmanuel Macron also invited American scientists and entrepreneurs to come work in France. "To all the scientists, entrepreneurs, engaged citicizens that were disappointed by the US president's decision," he assured them that they would "in France, find a second nation." "I am calling you: come work here, with us, on concrete solutions about climate," he added. "Tonight, America has turned its back on America, but France will never turn its back on Americans," Emmanuel Macron added.
Daaaaamn
I was surprised to learn Angela Merkel is supposed to be centre-right. Centrist in Europe seems to be hard left by American standards.Weren't people concerned Macron was too centrist? Lol.
This is a "after plastic surgery" Photoshop of all three.There's something slightly off about the Trump picture. Can't put my finger on it...