I was wrong about Ty and Trigger. I might be stubborn but I do try to learn from my mistakes. Further, it's you and Sorian who try to make the argument that they are similar in terms of vote placement, etc. I would argue that the two boats come off somewhat different... or rather, there are some key differences and that makes the case harder for me.
I understand learning from your mistakes but you can at least see where I'm coming from here, right? You push up both as Scum Leans, vote Ty/Trigger and then lament the fact that some of your other scum leans joined you in that vote, don't move off it, then back away from Crimson/Sophia afterwards.
Here I legit can't tell if I busted you trying to spin a narrative or if we're just arguing over semantics, but no, I wouldn't call it a defense. I'd call it an argument. I'd call it analysis. Defense generally implies an agenda. I don't feel like that had an agenda.
YouGotMe.gif
I mean we can argue the semantics of it if you want too but I saw it as a defense.
Of everyone on the board today, I feel like I'm the only one who's all "I dunno" re: Sophist being scum. But uh there was a typo there - I'm pushing that they might not be more than I ever pushed that they might be. That ending "aren't" should have been are.
Okay, that's what I thought. I saw the extra 'aren't' and got really confused lol.
What do you think of Natiko's certainty? I like the way he's arguing but I find the certainty off-putting especially because it just starts to feel like something he's pushing because, not that it's necessarily the most well constructed case. I know you seem to agree with him, enough to block them, but it's the certainty I'm asking about more than the team.
Hmmm, I can't really argue this point without referencing Natiko/Nomad. Certainty in itself isn't scummy - you can be '''100%''' certain in a read only to have it blow up in your face ( coughOurocough ) and that doesn't necessarily make you Scum. At this stage in the game I am a little worried over how certain Natiko seems to be but, at this point, given the whole game so far and everything Natiko has done I just don't feel like he is pulling some sort of grand narrative here. I'm taking both my normal read of him and the way he argues when dealing with his '100% certainty' target to come to the conclusion if he's being honest or not with his thoughts. So far I haven't seen anything from him and his arguments that double back on his own logic or don't make sense, something I would expect Scum to do when arguing so hard and for so long like this. And I mean, I'm not only just taking his word against Crimson/Sophia here, I'm looking up things myself and coming to my own conclusions about them as well. So I do think he really believes he has found scum here and, while I do agree with him in his conclusion, I just don't share the same fervor that he does.
Could he be faking this entire thing? Yes, and if he is I'm incredibly impressed as it's coming across as very honest and genuine and to manufacture that sort of thing would be incredible.
Flush and I have given up in our boat and are having a delightful chat about our research and our interests in games and game design. The game might be fucked but I have the best boyfriend.
Can you tell your sweetums to please answer my question from earlier? I feel like he's ignoring me. :<