Graphically I'd say no racer has surpassed Driveclub. It has a few flaws but overall it's still the best. I'm not alone in thinking this. Look at most Driveclub videos and you'll see things like "Still the best graphics in 2019"
I have the game, yes its a good looking game but it has been surpassed. it looks amazing in the wet but in the dry not so good. Some tracks look great and others not so great. it still plays well though
I have Driveclub, Forza Horizon 3 and I played hours of Forza Horizon 4 before dropping it. Driveclub still wins visually
Personally I don't think it does. Forza horizon 4 is currantly the best looking arcade racer for me and considering it's open world it's even more impressive
Would you say Forza Horizon 3 and Forza Horizon 4 look somewhat similar graphically?
Some things look better on one game and others on the other game.
Ok that's all I need to know for my analysis
So what makes you think driveclub looks better?
The lighting, car models, weather, visual damage, but mainly the natural lighting it looks the most realistic
There's a few that I might have posted already but FH3 and FH4 have a lot in common. They should though since the engine is never scrapped and is more iterative
FH3 does some things better than FH4 like shadows and grass textures and vice versa but there's not some humongous difference between the two
Lighting is better in 4 and car damage plus dirt and rain on the car
Then FH3 has better shadows for trees, better ground textures, but it is close
Looks great, Driveclub still has the edgeI just leave this here , because some of you didn't see Forza Horizon 4 in its full glory i think. The lighting is one of the most natural looking in all conditions and the detail is not even comparable to the other games, its way above other racers.
All gameplay
The only things that DC do better is rain, reflections and GI from the player headlights. Other than that i didn't see anyhting better than in Forza Horizon 4, and i say that as someone who likes DC ( still play it every week
). But that doesn' t mean that the other things are bad in DC, its car model is solid, the trees look nice and indeed the ligthing has its moments when the dynamic range is there. But Forza has much higher draw distance, overal better shadows, more natural lighting ( captured from the real thing), better car models, better textures, much more detailed environment, full environment GI, better car shaders for the most part, better snow, real deformation for sand, mud and snow, more detailed driver and 4 seasons on the whole map that changes everything from color to lighting. But still, DC is looker thats for sure.
That's the thing ain't it, we have been blessed with some ridiculously good looking driving games this gen. we are not picking what is best and I have my personal faves like forza horizon 4 but that doesn't mean I can't see how good driveclub is.The only things that DC do better is rain, reflections and GI from the player headlights. Other than that i didn't see anyhting better than in Forza Horizon 4, and i say that as someone who likes DC ( still play it every week
Its EA, they probably ran the numbers and concluded not enough people play in cockpit then layed off a few employees/contractors
More natural lighting and better car shaders than Driveclub?? I'm in disbelief of this thread lolThe only things that DC do better is rain, reflections and GI from the player headlights. Other than that i didn't see anyhting better than in Forza Horizon 4, and i say that as someone who likes DC ( still play it every week
GTS
ACC has a nice realtime dynamic lighting. It is generation ahead compared to baked lighting in terms of hadrware requrements,
VR was basically a demo added after the game was finished.
And yet wipeout has it added to the full game. It is doable.
Completely different games... Wipeout doesn't have 1/100 of details and physics of GTS.
Is that for VR to succeed in this area they need to make the full game playable rather than a Demo as you say
