Cjdamon042
Member
Not sure about emerald, but Platinum sold 805K in its NPD debut.
About a hundred thousand more than Platinum, IIRC.
Ah ok, so I guess in a way it is pretty in-line then, a little better in fact.
Not sure about emerald, but Platinum sold 805K in its NPD debut.
About a hundred thousand more than Platinum, IIRC.
How does this compare to New Super Mario Bros? All i can find is that it did around 316k in its first month (May 2006).
How does this compare to New Super Mario Bros? All i can find is that it did around 316k in its first month (May 2006).
Oh, was the launch price $34.99? I thought it was $29.99.It's wrong. NSMB's debut was arounc 270k in two weeks.
Wow, Pokemon Bombed big time. I guess this sequel idea never came into fruitation.
I don't see how in the world you can come to that conclusion.Wow, Pokemon Bombed big time. I guess this sequel idea never came into fruitation.
I am more shocked that a multinational corporation can so badly misjudge the market demand for a product.
Wow, Pokemon Bombed big time. I guess this sequel idea never came into fruitation.
Going with ports of their console games AGAIN (See PSP) might have something to do with why the Vita is floundering like a fish out of water and why the 3DS (While not selling as as robust as its predecessor) is enjoying healthy sales.
Wow, Pokemon Bombed big time. I guess this sequel idea never came into fruitation.
Wow, Pokemon Bombed big time. I guess this sequel idea never came into fruitation.
Yeah right 50$ of cut boost the sales, it's pretty knew... :/ & what a best strategy to increase the price more further.
Yep, there's pretty much no way they're hitting even their revised down 6m projection with these sales.RE6 did a lot worse than anyone expected. IIRC, it's at least 100k down from what RE5 did on just the 360 in its first month.
Man, there has been nothing that Capcom got right with the lead-up to the game's release.
Wait, so people do see this as successful entry? Do guys compare it as a 3rd entry of the series? I mean, its a brand new game and the difference of upgrade eclipses the one in Platinum and Emerald...
Isn't Gen III considered one of the worst Generations? I've hear many people say II was the peak of the series.Wonder how well a Rock Ruby / Shard Sapphire remake would do. I can't help but feel there isn't the same amount of nostalgia for Gen III as there was for I and II.
I think it is pretty hard to messure this. Would those people who pick up a PS3 or Xbox 360 that late had bought a PS4 or Xbox 720 instead if they had no choice? I guess it also depends on the price difference. Maybe someone picks up an older system this late because it is cheaper.
Wait, so people do see this as successful entry? Do guys compare it as a 3rd entry of the series? I mean, its a brand new game and the difference of upgrade eclipses the one in Platinum and Emerald...
The last year 360 has sold almost the double of the ps3 every month, how can compete the ps3 with the 360 userbase for the top ten?
That PS2 momentum did wonders for the bungling of the first 3-4 years of the PS3.That's pretty short term thinking. The momentum they have now and going forward is going to have a big impact on next gen.
So what do you all account for RE6's sales? On the surface it seemed like a great entry and a continuation of the RE5 gameplay. I would be surprised if it was just the reviews and negative press before hand that did it in. Didn't this game have solid preorders?
Wait, so people do see this as successful entry? Do guys compare it as a 3rd entry of the series? I mean, its a brand new game and the difference of upgrade eclipses the one in Platinum and Emerald...
It's the B-team recycled entry. It's more comparable to Platinum, Emerald and the remakes than it is new Gen releases.Wait, so people do see this as successful entry? Do guys compare it as a 3rd entry of the series? I mean, its a brand new game and the difference of upgrade eclipses the one in Platinum and Emerald...
On the surface, it feels like cash-grab with no confidence in its origins as a smaller scale, tension-filled adventure. Zombies, and scary, creepy things work best when they're not trapped inside of some wannabe epic action movie that cynically lifts shit poorly from better releases it aspires to sell like. When that happens, they become like the terrible, forgettable Resident Evil flicks. Past the surface, it's all due to the low-to-middling quality of the game experience itself, franchise and theme fatigue due to so many releases in a relatively short period of time, and an overwhelming sense that more recent titles' action-filled direction is threatening the series' core identity, losing what made the franchise big in the first place. Mostly, though, the game just isn't good. People blaming poor review averages aren't paying attention to the fact that those are the result of the poor product they're reviewing. Plenty of critical misfires still manage more relative sales success in their launch months than RE6 has.So what do you all account for RE6's sales? On the surface it seemed like a great entry and a continuation of the RE5 gameplay. I would be surprised if it was just the reviews and negative press before hand that did it in. Didn't this game have solid preorders?
So are those New Super Mario Bros's numbers any good compared to the last few?
I hope not, Nintendo is whoring out those games as bad as Activision is doing to COD.
Nintendo needs to make a sequel to Mario 64...end of discussion.
hmmmf. RE6 did ok considering the backlash.
One per system. Yeah, kind of like COD.I hope not, Nintendo is whoring out those games as bad as Activision is doing to COD
I am not sure if Mario is going to sell nearly as much as CoD; WW it may reach 3-4m; maybe unless you mean the whole franchise. But I guess EA Sport games sold pretty well this year.
NBA increase is because this year it was the only NBA, and Skylanders success is mostly due to the toys they will with.
And I think you partly answered yourself; a new AAA gaming selling like 500K and becoming one of the biggest new IP launches just shows how poorly new IPs are doing.
It may sell 2m and still not warrant a sequel; while last gen a lot of new IPs become million sellers, while the production costs and risks were much lower.
hmmmf. RE6 did ok considering the backlash.
It probably just feels a bit like it because New Super Mario Bros 2 and New Super Mario Bros U are released relatively close to eachother. It will probably take some years before we see another New Super Mario Bros game again.I hope not, Nintendo is whoring out those games as bad as Activision is doing to COD.
And it's not just JD down, look at Mario, Pokemon, etc. The market is contracted. Will new consoles bring everyone back? I think it's a forgone conclusion it wont. Doesnt mean things wont make money, but the traditional players are going to suffer since budgets and teams are still in place to support revenue from this generation. It's going to have to contract. It'll be a few more years before digital sales make up for retail declines to compensate. Fewer games will sell big, though they'll sell even bigger. Etc.
In fairness, sequels not matching up to the sales of originals is hardly a new concept. Pokemon in particular is performing about as you'd expect it to.
Right, well that certainly answers for some question I had regading PokeomB2/W2 success.
Cheers.