Assassins Creed Shadows: Real-life Japanese shrine officials are “taking action” over Ubisoft’s portrayal of religious site

Thick Thighs Save Lives

NeoGAF's Physical Games Advocate Extraordinaire
20250220-44587-header.jpg

The Itate Hyozu Shrine in Japan's Hyogo Prefecture is taking action over Ubisoft's usage of the religious site in the upcoming Assassins Creed Shadows, it's been confirmed. On the other hand, rumors about Japan's Association of Shinto Shrines taking action against Ubisoft have been debunked.

Last week, controversy was kicked up around a gameplay video from Assassin's Creed Shadows that was shared around the beginning of February. In the video, it is shown that the player can enter Itate Hyozu Shrine (in-game location based on the real-life shrine of the same name) and destroy parts of it, including its altar and sacred objects, which caused mixed reactions.

Some users claimed that the shrine being destroyable was inherently disrespectful to Japanese religion and culture, while others argued that it was just part of making the player's interaction with the world feel realistic. It may be worth noting here that ransacking the shrine is not part of game progression, as well as the fact that footage of its destruction was not used for promotion of the game.

Following the controversy, rumors started spreading that the shrine's real-life official were "furious" with Ubisoft and asking for Itate Hyozu's removal from Shadows. However, there had not been any credible sources or official statements from the parties in question to verify the story. But on February 20, Japan's Sankei News published statements by Itate Hyozu Shrine's officials on the matter. According to the report, the shrine's representatives are "taking appropriate action" regarding the portrayal of the religious site in Assassin's Creed Shadows.
When asked whether they had received prior notice from Ubisoft about the shrine's use, Itate Hyozu's official commented, "No, if they had contacted us, we would have refused." The official did not provide details about what "taking appropriate action" entails, so it remains unclear whether they are asking for the shrine's removal from the game, adjustments to what the player can do in it, or some other form of action.

In addition, rumors on social media also claimed that Japan's Association of Shinto Shrines was "taking action" against Ubisoft, but this has been debunked by an official interviewed by The Sankei News.
 
Has there ever been a game where we can destroy American holy sites or does McDonalds not allow their likeness to be used?
I think the Capitol gets litterally destroyed in a COD episode.

Agreed, why won't these dumb Japanese people just shut up and let us westerners wipe our asses with their religions, cultures, customs and traditions?
This is fiction ffs! The intro of Vanquish, a japanese game, is San Francisco being fucking nuked!
 
I'm sure all these people had the same reaction when all the previous games allowed you to pillage, loot and massacre innocents in churches and temples.

Unless it's not ACTUALLY about the destruction of Japanese religious sites, is it hmmm....
 
Damned if you do, damned if you don't. I wonder what these same people said about TLOU2 not letting you shoot religious symbols and items in the synagogue.
 
lol everyone so butthurt about a video game not being 1000% accurate. Japanese are getting w bit annoying. Chill out, it's a stupid Ubisoft game. This is embarrassing
 
I don't even care for this game too much, it doesn't look too interesting to me, but people getting triggered by a religious site getting destroyed in a game should seek professional treatment.
 
Agreed, why won't these dumb Japanese people just shut up and let us westerners wipe our asses with their religions, cultures, customs and traditions?

Various Japanese fiction is hardly guilt free in displaying stereotypical and/or widely inaccurate elements of different cultures and such, and I don't remember anyone from those cultures "taking action" against those Japanese writers.

Fair play is fair play.

John Lewis Lol GIF by Waitrose & Partners
 
0p1LZpW.jpeg


Ubisoft's "Get out of jail" card seems to have stopped working for AC: Shadows
 
0p1LZpW.jpeg


Ubisoft's "Get out of jail" card seems to have stopped working for AC: Shadows

"Inspired"
"Work of fiction"

You know, maybe the families of the victims of Ed Gein should have sued the filmmakers of Texas Chainsaw Massacre ("Inspired by a True Story" as it was advertised) for clearly taking the serial killer and using his story for a profitable slasher film but also wildly changing the details like having it set in Texas, changing the killers name and having him use a chainsaw, etc……oh wait, the families didn't do that. In fact, just like year the film was placed in the US National Film Registry.

Happy James Corden GIF by The Late Late Show with James Corden


Should Christians start suing every work of fiction that uses Jesus in an "inaccurate" manner? Or God for that matter? Jim Carrey and Morgan Freeman better watch out!

Danger 5 Laughing GIF
 
Japan is going full retard i see.

Nobody ever gave a fuck about destructible props in videogames, no matter the location or religion.
 
Last edited:
"Inspired"
"Work of fiction"

You know, maybe the families of the victims of Ed Gein should have sued the filmmakers of Texas Chainsaw Massacre ("Inspired by a True Story" as it was advertised) for clearly taking the serial killer and using his story for a profitable slasher film but also wildly changing the details like having it set in Texas, changing the killers name and having him use a chainsaw, etc……oh wait, the families didn't do that. In fact, just like year the film was placed in the US National Film Registry.

Happy James Corden GIF by The Late Late Show with James Corden


Should Christians start suing every work of fiction that uses Jesus in an "inaccurate" manner? Or God for that matter? Jim Carrey and Morgan Freeman better watch out!

Danger 5 Laughing GIF
Why don't you ask them why they didn't sue? Maybe they were paid off?
 
This is about a lack of respect to Japanese culture, not appropriation of it. There is a difference.
Please don't gaslight me.

"Cultural appropriation takes place when members of a majority group adopt cultural elements of a minority group in an exploitative, disrespectful, or stereotypical way."

Isn't the whole controversy around this game that Ubsisoft is making the main characters are a black samurai and a woman?

All this time I was being told games are just fiction.
 
All I see is someone roughing up the villagers and destroying objects in the environment. Pretty much what sandbox games have allowed in the last decade+. IIRC I shot someone inside a church in RDR. I must not give a 💩.
 
Please don't gaslight me.

"Cultural appropriation takes place when members of a majority group adopt cultural elements of a minority group in an exploitative, disrespectful, or stereotypical way."

Isn't the whole controversy around this game that Ubsisoft is making the main characters are a black samurai and a woman?

All this time I was being told games are just fiction.

I'm not gaslighting a thing. Simply having elements of Japanese culture in a video game could be called "cultural appropriation", but that is not the issue being taken up here. Neither is the main characters being black and a woman.
 
Ubisoft has no respect for Japan, its people, its culture and religion.

I'm actually stunned that people are actually on Ubisoft side this time.
Maybe they don't care about culture because they don't have one? Or maybe its just Japan and people are naturally inclined to dogpilled on them.
 
lol the RE thread is a slew of people claiming only white guys take issue with this game leading up to this news being posted.
 
Again with this? Listen I dont think the game looks good but the fact you can destroy a few boxes in a shrine who gives a shit man
 
Its like the world is conspiring against this game at every turn.
Nice not knowing you Ubisoft. Hand over the keys to Tencent on your way out.
 
Its like the world is conspiring against this game at every turn.
Nice not knowing you Ubisoft. Hand over the keys to Tencent on your way out.
The world? No just some grifters.

Nobody cares about being able to destroy a chair and a table inside a shrine. Give me a break
 
Is it just a run of the mill shrine or is it one of the highly sacred, super exclusive ones where only the Emperors family and the shrine head is allowed to enter?
 
I'm not gaslighting a thing. Simply having elements of Japanese culture in a video game could be called "cultural appropriation", but that is not the issue being taken up here. Neither is the main characters being black and a woman.
So you're telling, that Ubisoft taking a Japanese shrine from Japanese culture and allowing users to break some things on it is disrespectful?

At this point we're running around semantics.

Good talk.
 
Top Bottom