Grizzled Ghost
Member
They brought it on themselves.
Requiescat in Pace
They brought it on themselves.
at least you arent a Era member ( i guess ) otherwise you would need to self-censor every minute or else...To keep my access to NeoGAF, I self-censor daily. Sure, members here might be missing out on some content, but nothing is stopping them from finding me elsewhere. In other words, if you're a console player, tough luck. Meanwhile, PC gamers will enjoy uncensored gore and fully destructible shrines, and there's absolutely nothing the Japanese parliament can do about it.
Don't pretend politicians don't make empty threats either then. I agree with you that Ubisoft should have stood up for themselves, but this was a PR battle they surrendered to. Nothing more.
Actually PR wise I think they came out on top. An intriguing ~ forbidden game ~ talked about at the highest level of a nations government and generating global buzz on the day of release. With the actual changes made being almost inconsequential, and even bringing it more inline with the series, where you aren't supposed to kill civilians anyway.
I want to say that Ubi is too incompetent to orchestrate this kind of maneuver, but I'm starting to think we might be getting Keyser Soze'd.
How did 4 separate head monks find out about this shrine issue at the same time... and arrange press conferences?
Let alone getting the matter escalated to parliament so quickly?
Changing the character descriptions on the JP site... The Boba Tea... Yosuke... mysteriously delaying the game's release to co-inside with Japan's spring break... It's all falling into place now
![]()
How did 4 separate head monks find out about this shrine issue at the same time... and arrange press conferences?
Let alone getting the matter escalated to parliament so quickly?
Easy! There was a nigga destroying their precious shrines involved. How else do you mobilize an entire country other than saying, "LOOK, BROWN PEOPLE!" Works every time in America. Meanwhile, most of the jobs are being sent overseas by folks who look nothing like my God slow-roasted me to perfection head ass.
![]()
Yep people seem to have Zero Integrity now a days.Fucking WOW.
The fucking idiots with the non stop complaining about a black man in a fictional video game got us here. Your nonstop tears got the game censored.
The crybabies for this game are 1 million times worse than any woke mob.
Go Woke ... Go Broke.
Go Anti-woke.. Get censored and have no gore in a Samurai game. LMAO. im so mad
Thats a Losing Battle especially for artists. This tit for tat has to stop.Nope. The woke crowd caused this by trying to push their bullshit mental issues on others. Now we just retaliate by being oversensitive about things we actually don't give a shit about just to fuck with them.
Actually PR wise I think they came out on top. An intriguing ~ forbidden game ~ talked about at the highest level of a nations government and generating global buzz on the day of release. With the actual changes made being almost inconsequential, and even bringing it more inline with the series, where you aren't supposed to kill civilians anyway.
I want to say that Ubi is too incompetent to orchestrate this kind of maneuver, but I'm starting to think we might be getting Keyser Soze'd.
How did 4 separate head monks find out about this shrine issue at the same time... and arrange press conferences?
Let alone getting the matter escalated to parliament so quickly?
Changing the character descriptions on the JP site... The Boba Tea... Yosuke... mysteriously delaying the game's release to co-inside with Japan's spring break... It's all falling into place now
![]()
I completely agree, Japan thinks that they are special and others are not. Let's not forget some of the stuff that's came out of that country in their anime about other cultures.The Japanese government shouldnt even have complained about it. Where is their beef with Nioh and a hundred other titles? Fuck those old dusty geriatric fools
Listen I wont go attacking random npc's but yes you are right this is censorship.
The only reason he is weighing in is because the grifters pushed this narrative to them and as hard as they could.
I think alot of people care too, hence why it's okay for Ubisoft to edit their work if they mistakenly made that culture upset at them.Dunno, ask ubisoft. I do think lotsa people care about jp culture tho.
agreed. this's what all forms of self-righteousness sound like to me:Thats a Losing Battle especially for artists. This tit for tat has to stop.
there is no reasson to Ubisoft to follow with this nonsense, this is just their doing damage controlI mean do people have to break shrines in this game? If you're against it just don't break it? What about killing all these guards who have family and friends and are just trying to make an honest living in feudal japan.
I think a good question is, would as many people have cared if so many people hadn't constantly brought this game up as a beacon of culture warring for multiple years? I'm probably going to get some replies that state 'yes they would', but I don't think that's entirely true, because there is too much evidence of other AC games, including 2 of them taking place in China, with zero complaint about cultural integrity.I think alot of people care too, hence why it's okay for Ubisoft to edit their work if they mistakenly made that culture upset at them.
Minotaur, Gorgon, Cyclops and the portal to Atlantis (with your immortal father Pythagoras) was part of Odyssey before dlc. Valhalla had the Oden stuff before dlc. Origin only inclduded the massive Cobra, but they used editors notes in Discovery Tour because they included women in places without historical evidence. (And the DLC had the after-life, but I guess the arugment was that only DLC had the fantasy elements).Exactly, in the DLC. They put all the supernatural shit in the DLC, just like Origins and Odyssey, but you'd know that since you've played them all.
Also, conveniently side-stepping quotes from Ubisoft and the discovery tour again, nice.
Yes, who cares what the people who make the product say, some rando on a forum disagrees and we should take his word for it. Do you even hear yourself?
I thought that was ridiculous tooI mean, remember when black people complained that a white guy was only killing black zombies in Resident Evil 5, a game based in West Africa, so Capcom had to turn around and include white zombies to appease them.
With how ass the face models have been recently I doubt the characters would look anything like my parents anyways.Let's exaggerate a bit.
Image the game where your parents in their home (properly depicted and referenced) would be creatively and brutally killed and it was released for everyone on the pretext of being "fiction, its just a game"
Depicting actual people in fiction setting is forbidden for a reason. And some go further as to forbid depicting things of very high importance for certain group of people for similar reason.
c'mon, making some fucking furniture unbreakable and ppl bloodless is not censorship, you guys really need to look out into the real world.
Damn the pot calling the kettle retarded.god damn, dont be this retarded pls
Which companies did this? Ubisoft surely didnt. They never spoke up about any of thatAround ten years ago, companies like Ubi, who were until then making the games they wanted to make, started caving in to the *ahem* totally civil, reasonable requests of the likes of FF and the former GAF mob that since then has migrated elsewhere. And they went all in with it, uncompromisingly, ignoring user feedback from a certain part of the audience. Now that part of the audience sees an option to regain some power, and it’s seizing it. Maybe, maybe, all this drama could have been avoided by maintaining some balance and not systematically ignoring all feedback from a certain part of the audience and calling them names for almost a decade?
Remember when games used to add more fun factor elements as new installments are released? Remember when gamers were given morale and immoral choices in games because they are just video games? Well, forget all that when every government in the world decides to do what the Japanese parliament is doing.Remember when killing civilians got you a "game over" in the first Assassin's Creed games?
The point is that randomly killing civilians is against the assassin moral code in-game, as they are innocents and don't really do anything wrong.Remember when games used to add more fun factor elements as new installments are released? Remember when gamers were given morale and immoral choices in games because they are just video games? Well, forget all that when every government in the world decides to do what the Japanese parliament is doing.
The headline here is a change to tables and racks in temples and shrines, which are now indestructible in the Feudal Japan-set game. Ubisoft told IGN the day-one patch is for all players and not Japan-specific, but it’s hard to see this change in particular being anything but a response to the controversy surrounding the game in the country.
The point is that randomly killing civilians is against the assassin conduct in-game, as they are innocents and don't really do anything wrong.
I mean, remember when black people complained that a white guy was only killing black zombies in Resident Evil 5, a game based in West Africa, so Capcom had to turn around and include white zombies to appease them.
Putting pineapple on pizza in the case of Italians.Easy! There was a nigga destroying their precious shrines involved. How else do you mobilize an entire country other than saying, "LOOK, BROWN PEOPLE!"
I'm trying to care for this amount of censorship, but I can't. I'm also trying to sympathize with the people who seem to be so heavily invested in this censorship, but I'm also failing.
I think a good question is, would as many people have cared if so many people hadn't constantly brought this game up as a beacon of culture warring for multiple years? I'm probably going to get some replies that state 'yes they would', but I don't think that's entirely true, because there is too much evidence of other AC games, including 2 of them taking place in China, with zero complaint about cultural integrity.
I find this entire ordeal to be a cause and effect, but the cause is oddly not taking credit as the cause due to bad optics. Like in most cases, the side who were the main force of this domino effect would (and should) consider this a 'win' after all of their online dealings, but instead the credit is quickly being shoved to another party entirely. It's funny enough to remind me of a popular youtube skit/meme, the gold medal instigator.
![]()
A cap yapper, because fist fighting the pope is historically accurate right?No. This is all on Ubi. If they had stuck closer to historical accuracy from the start, none of this would have been a problem. Outside the animus stuff there is no need to bend history to fit woke agenda. Truth is that people with deep historical knowledge and interest used to work on these games.
It's wild to me that they managed to make one of the best ACs in the entire series (it feels like they put in legit effort to evolve/perfect the formula for the first time since Origins) but people are so hyper focused on politics these days that they can't see past the red.
Also, no bugs. I was legit worried about this after how Valhalla launched, but it's clean.
??Or that Ubisoft are so hyper focussed on politics that the controversy is entirely of their own making.