Is the XBOX 360 a Top 5 console of all time?

360 top 5 console of all time?


  • Total voters
    478

EverydayBeast

ChatGPT 0.001
Microsoft took responsibility for RROD, that console design was a mistake (even with the power brick unattached).

Yes the hard drive made you roll your eyes, but this is a console that introduced group chat, and online service with little to no issues (security breach on PSN).
 

Gambit2483

Member
Microsoft took responsibility for RROD, that console design was a mistake (even with the power brick unattached).

Yes the hard drive made you roll your eyes, but this is a console that introduced group chat, and online service with little to no issues (security breach on PSN).
Was the 360 revolutionary in a few ways? Yes.

But so were other consoles for other reasons (of their time)

NES - Set the Standard controller design (saved gaming from 80s crash)

PSX - Made disc gaming an industry standard with enhanced gaming visual and audio presentation

N64 - Set the blueprint for 3D gaming and analog control in a 3D space (and force feedback)

Dreamcast - Brought the Arcade to the Home and made Online gameplay a reality

XBOX - Perfected Online gameplay/online gaming community

Etc. etc....Even consoles After Xbox 360 set industry standards or innovations...
 
Last edited:
Microsoft took responsibility for RROD, that console design was a mistake (even with the power brick unattached).

Yes the hard drive made you roll your eyes, but this is a console that introduced group chat, and online service with little to no issues (security breach on PSN).
It's also the console that invented paying to play online

Before Xbox 360, playing console games online was free

Today, only playing PC games online is still free. The other 2 platform holders have copied Microsoft's amazing "innovation" and charge you to play online now

This alone should disqualify 360 from being Top 5 anything
 
Last edited:

Jinzo Prime

Member
Absolutely. Even putting aside the excellent game library and controller design.

XBLA, and Summer of Arcade especially, catapulted indie games into the mainstream and literally changed the landscape of gaming.
Yes, the X360 is one of the most influential consoles of all time and is still the way we make consoles today. Let's see it:
  • Took online gaming mainstream
  • First console with achievements
  • Started the modern indie game scene
  • Made installing to hard disk the standard
  • Defined dual thumbstick aming for console FPS
  • Arguably took WRPGs mainstream with Skyrim, Fallout, Mass Effect, and Dragon Age
  • Made online updates for games the standard
The 3DS, PS3, PS4, PS5, and Switch would not be what they are without the 360.
 
Doesn't make sense considering that most of the games also existed on PS3 and PC and there wasn't anything unique about the hardware. Xbox 360 greatest feat was being popular in America.

The console introduced true online play across the board, made the first official digital game store, and added achievements that now even retro games have included. All the stuff that is now standard for current and future consoles. On top of that it took away so many PS exclusives like Tekken, Final Fantasy, Ace Combat etc. As a Playstation fan at the time, the xbox360 walked in the meeting room and bent everyone over.
 

The Lunch Legend

GAF's Nicest Lunch Thief and Nosiest Dildo Archeologist
Xbox 360 had 4822 games.
The actual number is around 2,100 games.

why you always lying GIF
 
The console introduced true online play across the board, made the first official digital game store, and added achievements that now even retro games have included. All the stuff that is now standard for current and future consoles. On top of that it took away so many PS exclusives like Tekken, Final Fantasy, Ace Combat etc. As a Playstation fan at the time, the xbox360 walked in the meeting room and bent everyone over.
PS3 had both the digital store and online play since launch. Xbox 360 had slightly better graphics performance due to the complexity of the PS3 architecture, but other than that, there wasn't any relevant innovation or unique features.

Think about the hardware of the NES, SNES, N64, PSX, the introduction of tech like Mode 7, 3D graphics, analog controller, first 3D Mario, all the classic IPs born on those consoles. Xbox 360 had Call of Duty 2 and a few first party titles, but compared to the PS3 it's 99% the same.
 

Tg89

Member
Hard to say. I really enjoyed the 360 at the time, but in retrospect I have very little desire to go back to that era. I don't think I'll ever have nostalgia for that generation, maybe that's more related to the point in my life that it happened though.

SNES, PS2, PS1 and Switch are definitely ahead of it. I'd probably put Gamecube or PS4 in the 5th spot but 360 is in that group, I think GC/PS4 have higher highs but 360 has a ton of consistency/quantity.
 
PS3 had both the digital store and online play since launch. Xbox 360 had slightly better graphics performance due to the complexity of the PS3 architecture, but other than that, there wasn't any relevant innovation or unique features.

Think about the hardware of the NES, SNES, N64, PSX, the introduction of tech like Mode 7, 3D graphics, analog controller, first 3D Mario, all the classic IPs born on those consoles. Xbox 360 had Call of Duty 2 and a few first party titles, but compared to the PS3 it's 99% the same.

PS3 came out a year later....so xbox still did it first. A whole year ahead of PS3. As for the cell mumbo jumbo, they just shot themselves in the foot with that one and thank god they fired Ken Kutaragi. Guy almost singlehandedly destroyed the whole brand because of his ego that he thought he was some tech GOD. MS was always going to go the PC route and as it showed thats the way to go forward because what point is innovation in tech when you made it 10 times harder for developers to just port the same damn game. Curing cancer, being a super computer or calculating NAVY aircraft trajections, no player gave a shit about that.

Ps3 made it in the end but it took 3 years of basically shitty exclusives, terrible third party support for how hard it was to operate with cell. Only 3 years later they finally went into overdrive and started pumping out hits.
 

SkylineRKR

Member
Hmm no. PS2 and PS1 are better. Even PS3 i think. Maybe not during launch window, but Xbox eventually dumped its core audience and ofcourse had a rocky start with failures. I had 2 consoles die by late 2007. PS3 kept on going. PS4 is likely better as well.

I also prefer the Dreamcast and original Xbox to it. And SNES + Genesis. But the 360 software wasn't bad during its maiden years and it made online play the standard for consoles. They really had Sony cornered in significant markets, but they kind of tried to go for the audience that had just abandoned Wii. This initially worked, but wore out after a year.
 

SkylineRKR

Member
Absolutely baffled to see so many posts with PS3 as a top 5. Fucking what? PS3?

My list is likely something like this:

1 PS2
2 N64
3 PS4
4 360
5 SNES

PS3 is really good actually. It had a rocky start, and it was very slow with updates and installations and the such, but franchises like Uncharted, TLOU, Souls started on this system. And it pretty much kept pushing for single player experiences in a co-op and FPS crazed landscape. Plus, there was online play without requiring a fee. It was the last system I just bought, I put an aftermarket HDD in it, signed in and never paid for anything else except games. Meanwhile I played the shit out of Warhawk, BF2, Motorstorm 2 and Killzone 2 online. My old USB stuff such as Saturn PC controllers for 2d Fighters worked on it too.

Besides the IQ and perf (which 360 also suffered from), we ate really good that gen. I miss the rate of output and many IP.
 

TheKratos

Member
Opinion invalidated.
SSD and performance modes alone make this generation top 5. We take fast loading for granted, but we forget easily how atrocious loading times were in the past.

I remember playing World on PS4 and staring at shit loading screen before every damn hunt, switched to PC with SSD and was shocked with the difference. Now it's a standard on consoles.
 

RavenSan

Off-Site Inflammatory Member
PS3 is really good actually. It had a rocky start, and it was very slow with updates and installations and the such, but franchises like Uncharted, TLOU, Souls started on this system. And it pretty much kept pushing for single player experiences in a co-op and FPS crazed landscape. Plus, there was online play without requiring a fee. It was the last system I just bought, I put an aftermarket HDD in it, signed in and never paid for anything else except games. Meanwhile I played the shit out of Warhawk, BF2, Motorstorm 2 and Killzone 2 online. My old USB stuff such as Saturn PC controllers for 2d Fighters worked on it too.

Besides the IQ and perf (which 360 also suffered from), we ate really good that gen. I miss the rate of output and many IP.
I loved my PS3 -- I realize my comment may come off as critical of the PS3, but it was a great console! I was just shocked people put it top 5. - It's a top 10 for sure, but I just can't in good faith have it in the top 5
 

Vaquilla

Member
I'd actually disagree that 360's second half was weak, it still got great games like Halo Reach, Gears 3/Judgement, Witcher 2, Alan Wake, Forza 4 and Horizon 1/2, Splinter Cell Conviction, Skyrim, Bioshock Infinite, Portal 2, Arkham City, Dead Space 2, Far Cry 3, Dishonoured, Rayman Legends, Metro 2033/Last Light, Rise of the Tomb Raider, Titanfall, etc.

As a 360 owner I had a great time with it in 2010-2015 and just ignored the Kinect stuff.
 
Top Bottom