http://www.forbes.com/sites/benzing...-decline-after-lackluster-wii-u-presentation/
Isn't Forbes supposed to be a credible media organization? This sounds like it was written by a bitter fanboy.
Surely was. I think Forbes allow other people to write for them off the cuff? Their more a journal than a 'media organisation' in having their own hired analysts etc.
What a terrible article. What the fuck is his comment about Facebook? How over done was that! He obviously hasn't paid much attention to shares and is new to it ffs.
June 6: $14.52
June 7: $13.98
June 8: $13.75
June 11: $13.44
June 12: $13.76 (The first increase in a week.)
We haven’t seen a steady decline like that since Facebook’s (NASDAQ: FB) IPO.
What the actual fuck? I mean Nintendo stocks
are something to mention, but in the long term where there has been a decrease - this means little atm. And no where near Facebooks hilarious stuff ('since' maybe hes only 12 and has never seen the stock market...right? Right...I might send him some articles from 2008 lol)
The whole thing is 100% mental. As you say it definetly is fanboy bollocks. Whys he talking about the Gamecube? Also hes shocked the Wii version sold more than the Gamecube lol! Its impressive the gamecube sold so many - if anything this article is actually saying the Gamecube managed to punch above its weight (it did)
Can the company make a comeback? Sure — in five years. It will take a whole other console (and possibly a whole other handheld) for Nintendo to return to the glory days of Wii- and Nintendo DS-sized success.
Or you know - first party games within the next 2 years. /sigh
At one point this is done:
(Read about Apple making less money on every next-gen MacBook here.)
A 100% random add in. Advertising the site he works on, hes not with Forbes. Seems Forbes is more a blog which you pay to get promoted on.
Some good points in there I suppose, but completely wrecked by the poor level of analysis/reality/coherent argument and generally a huge level of exaggeration (wtf is that Facebook comment?!)
EDIT: Not a fanboy looking at his other articles. Just not very bright and posting as many every day to catch buzzwords for his articles. One of many in a sea of financial hacks.
Everything he writes is hugely exaggerated and over done. Theres a history of titles that make no sense (
Diablo 3s success to cannibalise World of Warcraft then going on to quote Patcher for the article and all he says is people might play less hours of WoW for a bit but it won't affect subscriptions) and just inaccurate reporting (WiiU price expected at E3 - no it wasn't, it was known there would be no announcement.
A number off WiiU articles actually. As I say - seems like buzz words to me. I was surprised how bad everything he does is.
Okay bit of a fanboy:
Year after year, Sony (NYSE: SNE) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) continue to drag their feet, staying the course instead of releasing new and innovative hardware. New consoles keep our industry young. They reinvigorate the masses and inspire mass sales. But in an effort to stretch the profitability of PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360, their respective makers have decided to wait to release their next consoles.
'Our' is a nice choice of phrase. Hes one of 'those'. He does like Pikmin though. So not all bad