http://www.forbes.com/sites/benzing...-decline-after-lackluster-wii-u-presentation/
Yeah, so quite a few problems here. Yes, Nintendo screwed up and is having PR issues. Further, it is possible that things are going to turn sour for the Wii U very fast.
But, this article is full of hyperbole and sounds like it was written by a one of those players that considers gore and violence "mature." How exactly did Nintendo work to destroy the console business? The author implies that because Nintendo went after an expanded audience and won't be able to this time around, they are somehow responsible for trying to destroy the console business. Huh? Isn't it too early to say Nintendo won't reach this audience?
Also, Capcom had already decided to port Resident Evil 4 before it was released on Gamecube. That aside, didn't the Gamecube have a ton of AAA games (long before RE4)? Seems like having AAA titles alone didn't help the GCN yet the author implies that this is the issue the Wii U is facing. He implies it'll be years before they arrive but the system isn't even out and Nintendo hasn't formally announced 2013 titles anyway.
It is true that Wii U is going to have trouble matching the Wii and DS, but really that is true for any console because selling at record levels (to the point of hardware shortages) for 3 full years was unexpected everyone kept saying it was a fad to die off but never really didn't sputter until the last year or so, after getting near abandoned by Nintendo and the rest of the industry.
Isn't Forbes supposed to be a credible media organization? This sounds like it was written by a bitter fanboy.