It's closer to the iterative design of the GB and DS series of handhelds imo.
NES -> SNES is the one exception in consoles.
N64 -> GC had a lot of changes, many of which were ultimately underutilized.
You'd be left waiting then, because the chip is custom this time. No off-the-shelf trash, there's also no way in hell that size equals an 8nm chip... It's thinner than the Ally for gods sake.Can't wait to see the "it's between a Pro and a Series S" crowd to backtrack and state how much power doesn't matter when Nintendo will underclock the console so much it will barely reach Steam Deck camp.
The custom data was real, mfs! 2-4 TFLOPS with LPDDR5X 7500 MT/s and dual cooling system like the Rog Ally, let's fucking go.
Ram Bandwidth 100GB/s?
On my translation I get "Realtek", makes sense I guess.> Audio chip model: Ruiwu ALC5658-CG.
>
> Video signal conversion (DisplayPort to HDMI) must be chip model; Ruixian RTD2175N must be chip (support HDMI 2.1).
>
> Network chip model: Ruiming RTL8153B-VB-CG and Gigabit Ethernet chip (the base has a network cable interface).
No because it implies making textures, and Nintendo hate putting textures in their games.IS IT POSSIBLE
It passes the Steam Deck plus has hardware based scaling, right? That seems like a pretty legit leap ahead if so.
This is seriously like back in the old days of Nintendo competing on specs again.
So specs wase can we finally get this Game ALREADY
IS IT POSSIBLE
Can't wait to see the "it's between a Pro and a Series S" crowd to backtrack and state how much power doesn't matter when Nintendo will underclock the console so much it will barely reach Steam Deck camp.
If designing the fastest and most forward thinking mobile device to date isn't competing in specs, I frankly don't know what it is. Not everything has to be a PS5 sized juggernaut.um no?
Can't wait to see the "it's between a Pro and a Series S" crowd to backtrack and state how much power doesn't matter when Nintendo will underclock the console so much it will barely reach Steam Deck camp.
This is seriously like back in the old days of Nintendo competing on specs again.
They should be bigger, yeah. Not sure by how much though. Putting the original Switch on top of the new one it doesn’t look like there’ll be a huge difference imo, but difficult to say..If the screen is that much larger, surely the Joycon are larger than the current ones as well? They still cover the full sides of the thing. So they might be a bit more comfortable to use (especially in MP when you just use one Joycon each).
This guy gets it!! ^^^ I am happy there is HDMI 2.1 in meaning hopefully some current tech like VRR is implemented. Just hoping it's not completely obsolete out of the gate. Switch was at best just below OG Xbox One level at max. I would ideally love somewhere around PS4 pro level with more current graphical features but this IS Nintendo we're talking about. Keeping expectations very low.How many GameCubes taped together? Someone figure out the FLOPS situation
Looks to be 7.5 to 8” screen. I think that’s an OG Switch comparison.Man....I hope that's an 8 inch screen.
So am I correct in thinking the Switch 2 will be as powerful as a base PS4/Xbox -one?
They don’t have two lines of products to sell like before with handheld and console.Am I the only one bothered by the fact that Nintendo look to be releasing another bland looking tablet with joycons attached?
I appreciate that Nintendo are now coining it in, but I really miss the risk taking Ninty, I really do.
Over 4x the memory bandwidth is huge compared to what Devs had to work with on the current Switch's 25GB/s of bandwidth.120 GB/s according to this leak as the bus is 128 bit
I agree, docked it has potential to take shots at the ROG Ally, but again we gotta see how much of it Nintendo actually uses.
They won't need all of it if they have DLSS. People are going to lose their minds on what they show for a new Zelda game, and remakes of old ones like BOTW.
Slightly more faster GPU than a PS4 Pro when docked (way more powerful CPU in Switch 2 though) and around the base PS4 in handheld mode.
120 GB/s according to this leak as the bus is 128 bit
Slightly more faster GPU than a PS4 Pro when docked (way more powerful CPU in Switch 2 though) and around the base PS4 in handheld mode.
Can't wait to see the "it's between a Pro and a Series S" crowd to backtrack and state how much power doesn't matter when Nintendo will underclock the console so much it will barely reach Steam Deck camp.
And their guesses match pretty much exactly the specs we got now.We already know the SoC in the Switch 2 though. It's the custom T239 processor from Nvidia (even DF reported on it a year ago). The only remaining detail is the SoC (GPU & CPU) clock speed while docked and portable.
Like PS4.2 and Xbox One.3 In term of GPU and PS5 and Series in term of CPU… A lot better than some people expected.So am I correct in thinking the Switch 2 will be as powerful as a base PS4/Xbox -one?
Honestly, I have always been very fond of Nintendo, but I couldn’t be any less excited about the Switch 2. This could be their most uninspired transition to a new gen that I have witnessed in my lifetime. It appears essentially akin to upgrading your iPad. I hope I’m wrong though, and the Switch 2 has some kind of nice surprise up its sleeve.They don’t have two lines of products to sell like before with handheld and console.
A misstep in their single product offering will be a lot more costly. So yeah, don’t see them doing anything crazy.
Looks the same.
As far as the grips/comfort is concerned that's not a good thing.
Skull & Co to the rescue again.
7500 MT/s x 128 bit = 960,000 Mb/sRam Bandwidth 100GB/s?
...is it though?